I tried Microsoft’s Windows 365 Cloud PC on MacOS, Android, and iOS – here’s what it’s like


windows365-business-hero

Ed Bott/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • The Windows 365 Cloud PC lets you use Windows 11 on any device – PC, Mac, iPad, or phone.
  • It’s a subscription-based service, and the costs are still relatively high.
  • The biggest benefit: no worries about repairing and replacing hardware.

My newest PC is the thinnest and lightest I’ve ever had. It’s literally a pixel thick, it weighs absolutely nothing, and it’s powerful enough to get me through a full day’s work without ever needing a recharge.

I am talking, of course, about my new Windows 365 Cloud PC. It’s a subscription-based service that Microsoft is currently offering for 20% off, and I’m halfway through my one-month trial. I’ve been running my Cloud PC on every device I can get my hands on, including multiple PCs, a MacBook, a five-year-old iPad, and even a Samsung phone. Here it is, running in a Google Chrome tab on a Windows PC.

windows365-in-chrome-window

This Windows 365 Cloud PC is running in a tab in my Google Chrome browser. 

Screenshot by Ed Bott/ZDNET

Who needs a Cloud PC, anyway? What’s the experience like? How much does it cost? And, most importantly, is that monthly fee worth it? I’ve got your answers right here.

What’s a Cloud PC?

A Windows 365 Cloud PC is a Windows machine that’s hosted in Microsoft’s data centers. Unlike the older Azure Virtual Desktop, Windows 365 is a fixed, per-user virtual PC that is equipped with dedicated resources (CPU, memory, storage) and runs Windows 11 Enterprise.

Also: My new favorite Windows app made my PC safer and more reliable – and it’s free

The Cloud PC I’m using for this test includes 2 virtual CPUs, 8 GB of RAM, and 128 GB of storage. I can connect to the PC through any web browser, or I can use the dedicated Windows app, which is available for Windows, MacOS, Android, and iOS.

windows365-app-sign-in

The Windows App (formally known as Remote Desktop) can use Windows Hello to connect to a virtual PC in the cloud.

Screenshot by Ed Bott/ZDNET

Sign in to the app using your work or school account (sorry, personal accounts aren’t supported), and the provisioned Cloud PC shows up in the app or browser window, ready for you to use.

If the Windows app seems familiar, that might be because you’ve seen it before under its old name — Remote Desktop. The new version is designed using the WinUI3 framework and is easy to set up. Just sign in using the credentials assigned to your device, with no additional configuration required.

How easy is it to set up?

That depends on how familiar you are with Microsoft 365 administration tools. If you already have a Microsoft 365 Business or Enterprise account, just go to Windows365.com and sign in as an account administrator to set up a trial. It uses the same Microsoft Entra ID credentials you use with that account.

Also: How to check your Windows PC for expiring security certificates – a big one ends in June

If you don’t have a Microsoft 365 account, you need to create a business account with Microsoft; then, optionally, you can attach a custom domain to it. The Microsoft administrative interface can be a little intimidating, but it’s not difficult once you learn your way around.

The one-month trial is good for up to 25 users. (A paid account can add up to 300 users.) You need to add a credit card, and the subscription will automatically renew when the trial is up unless you cancel it before the end of the first month.

windows365-free-trial

The first month of a Windows 365 subscription is free, but your credit card will be charged after the trial ends unless you cancel.

Screenshot by Ed Bott/ZDNET

How easy is it to use?

You can connect to your cloud PC from just about anywhere, including a web browser or using the Windows app.

I found the experience nearly identical on a Windows PC and a Mac, where the keyboard and mouse (and touchscreen on the Windows PC) worked exactly as expected. A nice bonus is that I was able to sign in on my Windows PC using Windows Hello, instead of having to enter credentials manually.

On an iPad, the experience with a touchscreen was difficult. You have to drag the Windows mouse pointer to where you want it, then tap the screen to “click” the remote mouse pointer. Things improved dramatically when I connected a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse to the iPad, and I wouldn’t recommend using it any other way.

Also: How to upgrade your ‘incompatible’ Windows 10 PC to Windows 11 – for free

I was able to install the Android version of the Windows app on a Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, but trying to use the Cloud PC on that small screen was impossible. With a USB-C or Bluetooth connection to a larger monitor, though, and a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse, this would be a perfectly good remote PC. (I didn’t try this configuration with an iPhone, but I expect the results would be the same.)

If you use a browser as the host, you can expand the Cloud PC session to full screen as well, with a small toolbar at the top to manage the session. You can show or hide that toolbar as needed.

You can use local resources, such as a webcam, microphone, printers, and the host PC’s clipboard, on the Cloud PC. As a test, I used Google Chat for a video meeting between a Cloud PC session on an iPad, with a regular Windows 11 PC on the other end. The audio and video performance were both excellent, with no lag.

The best part? When I closed the app or browser window, all my work stayed exactly where it was, and when I signed back in, I was able to pick up where I left off.

How’s performance?

I was surprised at first by how long the initial remote session took to open — I clocked it at a little over 2 minutes and 30 seconds. Reconnecting to a previously open session was much faster, on the order of 10 seconds or so.

Also: Yes, you can get Microsoft 365 free – here’s how

In operation, the Cloud PC feels pretty much like running a local PC with equivalent resources. The biggest drag came from the limited RAM on the Cloud PC. At 8 GB, I encountered a bit of memory pressure occasionally, although that would have been true on a physical PC as well.

Office apps ran as smoothly as they do on my local PC and Mac, and YouTube videos and music also played well, without any noticeable glitching in video or audio.

How much does it cost?

The promotions offer cuts the cost of the Cloud PC for one year. The free trial sets up a 2 vCPU/8GB/126GB configuration, which normally costs $36 a month, plus sales tax if applicable. After the trial ends, the special promotional pricing takes effect, bringing the monthly cost of using that virtual PC down to $28.80 (on a month-to-month subscription) or $27.72 with an annual commitment.

Subscribing to a more powerful PC increases the cost significantly. To move up to 16 GB of RAM, for example, the least expensive configuration has 4 vCPUs and 256 GB of storage, and the promotional price is $50.56 monthly ($47.78 for an annual commitment). After the promo period, the price goes to $63.20 a month.

Prices can hit nosebleed levels if you add enough resources. The most expensive combination I found has 16 vCPUS, 64 GB of RAM, and 1 TB of storage. It will cost you $192.93 a month for the first year, after which the price shoots up to $241.16 a month. Ouch.

And no, those prices don’t include the desktop Office apps or OneDrive storage. For that, you need a separate Microsoft 365 subscription.

You can see a full Windows 365 Cloud PC price list for US customers here: Windows 365 Business Plans and Pricing.

These prices are for Windows 365 Business licenses, which allow you to add up to 300 accounts. Windows 365 Enterprise has a different set of rules and prices.

Who needs this, really?

If you have Windows 10 PCs that can’t be upgraded to Windows 11, this is an expensive way to keep them going for a few more years. A Windows 365 subscription includes Extended Security Updates for Windows 10 until October 2028 at no extra cost.

If you’re running a business with hybrid or remote workforce, this option might be very attractive. Instead of buying, configuring, and managing work PCs for employees, you can give them a Cloud PC subscription and let them use whatever personal device they prefer, including Macs and iPads.

The IT staff can manage everything using Intune policies; they don’t need to worry about lost or stolen PCs, and they don’t have to repair or replace a PC if it breaks or is damaged. In regulated industries, where data has to stay in the corporate cloud and not on local devices, this option is especially attractive.

Having a Cloud PC makes life easier for the remote employees as well, who no longer have to juggle two laptops to switch between work and personal tasks. And they can leave work in progress on the remote PC and come back to it without having to reopen a bunch of apps and files.

Also: I tested the Surface Pro with 5G, and it’s Microsoft’s most complete business 2-in-1 yet

The biggest drawback, of course, is cost. Once the promotional pricing ends, my basic configuration will cost $432 a year, and a more powerful virtual PC would cost $758.40 a year. Is that a good deal? It’s certainly a premium over the cost of an equivalent physical PC. Mostly, the equation depends on how much you value the reduction in management hassles and the luxury of never having to replace or repair a company PC.

Finally, everything depends on the user having a reliable, fast, low-latency internet connection. If you need to work offline regularly, this isn’t for you.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


The Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid has quickly become the default choice for buyers looking to step into an affordable hybrid SUV. It’s practical, efficient, and backed by a reputation that makes it an easy recommendation. But when you look beyond the badge, it’s no longer the clear-cut value leader it appears to be.

One Korean rival from Kia quietly outperforms it where it matters most. It’s cheaper to buy, significantly more fuel-efficient, and offers a more refined and spacious experience, despite targeting the same budget-conscious buyers. Instead of just meeting expectations, it raises them for what an entry-level hybrid SUV should deliver.

That’s what makes this comparison so one-sided. When a vehicle costs less while doing more, using less fuel, offering more room, and feeling more polished, it stops being an alternative and starts looking like the obvious choice.

In order to give you the most up-to-date and accurate information possible, the data used to compile this article was sourced from various manufacturer websites, including the EPA.


2026 Toyota Crown Signia


This Toyota hybrid beats Acura, Genesis, and even Lexus where it matters most

The Toyota Crown Signia does more than keep up. In several categories, it sets the pace.

There aren’t many small hybrid SUVs, but the Kia Niro is the best

Easily the most budget-friendly crossover on the market

Hybrid crossovers are a really attractive proposition. You get the added practicality of an SUV and fuel efficiency that keeps your monthly fuel bills low. Perhaps the most obvious choice here, especially if you’re on a tight budget, is the Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid. However, if you’re looking for the best bang for your buck, and the most efficiency, then the Kia Niro remains king of the subcompact SUV segment.

2026 Kia Niro Hybrid trims and pricing

Models

Starting MSRP

LX

$27,390

EX

$30,190

SX

$33,390

SX Touring

$35,790

As we’ve already mentioned, the Corolla Cross Hybrid is kind of the benchmark for small hybrid SUVs, with its badge definitely helping make it so popular. The Toyota has a starting price of $29,395, meaning it is just over $2,000 more expensive than the Kia. Despite this, we think even the most affordable Niro Hybrid feels more refined, better equipped, and, to top it all off, its more efficient.

With the Niro being one of the most affordable crossovers on the market, you have a little wiggle room when it comes to trims. We still wouldn’t climb the ladder far, as we think the EX offers the best bang for your buck. It comes with niceties like a smartphone charging pad, faux-leather upholstery, and an upgraded infotainment screen. The Premium package is also definitely worth the extra $2,000, adding things like a panoramic sunroof, a power-operated tailgate, and a premium sound system.


Front 3/4 shot of a red 2024 Mazda MX-5 Miata RF driving on a winding road with the ocean in the background.


These 5 sporty cars keep smiles high and fuel bills low

Fun behind the wheel doesn’t have to mean pain at the pump.

Neither are particularly entertaining, but the Niro is lighter on fuel

Beating Toyota at the hybrid game isn’t easy

Toyota is one of the most experienced automakers out there when it comes to building hybrid powertrains, with the Japanese brand being a big proponent of the setup. This is why it’s so impressive that the little Niro comes out ahead when it comes to efficiency. On top of this, Kia has delivered a more refined driving experience that feels better than you’d expect considering the price you pay.

Kia Niro Hybrid performance and efficiency


980919-1.jpg

kia-logo.jpeg

Base Trim Engine

1.6L I4 Hybrid

Base Trim Transmission

6-speed auto-shift manual

Base Trim Drivetrain

Front-Wheel Drive

Base Trim Horsepower

103.5 HP @5700 RPM

Base Trim Torque

106.3 lb.-ft. @ 4000 RPM

Base Trim Fuel Economy (city/highway/combined)

53/54/53 MPG

Base Trim Battery Type

Lithium polymer (LiPo)

Make

Kia

Model

Niro



The Corolla Cross Hybrid has a little more grunt than the Kia, putting down 196 horsepower versus the Niro’s dinky 139 horses. The 1.6-liter engine in the Korean crossover is an underachiever, which is why it takes around 8.9 seconds to get up to 60 miles per hour. With both of these crossovers being more urban crawlers than highway cruisers, we don’t think that lack of power is the end of the world.

There really isn’t a winner when it comes to driving engagement here, with both small SUVs being exceptionally dull to drive. However, the Kia Niro does come feature a pretty plush ride quality. It also gets a six-speed DCT instead of the CVT in the Corolla, which results in less droning when accelerating, resulting in a more refined experience.

Fuel economy

Model

City

Highway

Combined

Kia Niro FE

53 MPG

54 MPG

53 MPG

Kia Niro

53 MPG

45 MPG

49 MPG

Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid

46 MPG

39 MPG

42 MPG

Efficiency is a massive reason to pick a Kia Niro over a Corolla Cross Hybrid. The base model Niro is rated for up to 53 miles per gallon combined, with every other model managing 49 miles per gallon combined. This means that even the least efficient Niro is rated to get seven more miles per gallon than a Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid.


2027 Hyundai IONIQ 9 AWD Performance Calligraphy Black Ink


This Hyundai SUV takes three-row EV luxury into new territory

Hyundai IONIQ 9 AWD Performance Calligraphy Black Ink reveal

Kia delivers a sleek and stylish interior in the 2026 Niro

Meanwhile, the Corolla Cross is a bit boring

Toyota has always been known to value simplicity, and this has often resulted in somewhat underwhelming interiors. While there isn’t anything wrong with the cabin of the Corolla Cross, and it does come well-equipped, it does lean a little too far in the utilitarian direction. The Niro, on the other hand, finds a good middle ground between simplicity and modernity.

Interior dimensions and comfort

Model

Kia Niro Hybrid

Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid

Front row headroom

40.5 inches

38.6 inches

Front row legroom

41.5 inches

42.9 inches

Second row headroom

39.6 inches

39 inches

Second row legroom

39.8 inches

32 inches

Cargo capacity (behind second row)

22.8 cubic feet

21.5 cubic feet

Both the Niro and the Corolla Cross feel very practical for cheap subcompact SUVs, but the Kia has a pretty clear advantage. The Niro offers a much more spacious rear row of seats, with tons of legroom. You’d have no problem fitting even particularly tall passengers in the rear seats. It also does have a slightly more spacious cargo hold, though the difference here is much smaller.

Both the Corolla Cross and Niro have similar philosophies regarding interior design, but with some differences in execution. Both aim for basic functionality, but the Kia does it in a much more contemporary way. It’s obvious at all times that both crossovers are budget-oriented, in no small part thanks to the cheap plastics used, but build quality is good. The Kia also offers a few upscale touches that put it ahead of its Japanese rival, especially on higher trim levels.

Infotainment and technology

There is very little competition between the Niro and Corolla Cross when it comes to tech features. Both come standard with an eight-inch infotainment screen to start, with a 10.3-inch screen available on every trim but the base Niro and a 10.5-inch screen being optional in the Corolla Cross.

The two budget crossovers are fairly evenly matched when it comes to other tech features. Things like smartphone mirroring and a wireless smartphone charging pad are available on the Kia and Toyota. One key difference is the optional sound systems, with the Niro’s seven-speaker Harman/Kardon sound system performing much better than the optional JBL system in the Corolla Cross.


Cheaper, more efficient, and more refined

When comparing these two small crossovers side-by-side, it’s really hard to make a case for the Toyota. The Corolla Cross does have more power and comes with the peace of mind you get from the Toyota badge, but in just about every other way the Kia feels like the better deal. For less money, you’re getting a crossover that is more spacious, less boring on the inside, and far more efficient. In just about every way, the Niro is a more successful budget hybrid crossover.



Source link