Waymo opens cheaper Ojai robotaxi built by China’s Geely



TL;DR

Waymo has opened its sixth-generation Ojai robotaxi to select riders in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Phoenix. Built by Geely’s Zeekr in China, the Ojai cuts sensor count by 42% and costs roughly $75,000 less per unit than the Jaguar I-PACE it replaces.

Waymo has started offering rides to select passengers in its new Ojai robotaxi, the first vehicle purpose-built for autonomous ride-hailing rather than retrofitted from an existing car. The Ojai runs on Waymo’s sixth-generation Driver system and is built on a platform manufactured by Zeekr, the electric vehicle brand owned by China’s Geely, the same conglomerate that owns Volvo. Rides are initially available in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Phoenix, with San Diego, Las Vegas, and Denver expected to follow this summer.

The Ojai replaces the Jaguar I-PACE that has served as Waymo’s primary robotaxi since 2020. It is a boxier, roomier vehicle with a lower step-in height, a higher ceiling, and a removable steering wheel. The interior is designed for passengers rather than drivers, reflecting the fact that nobody is supposed to sit behind the wheel.

Fewer sensors, lower cost

The most significant change is economic. The Ojai uses 13 cameras, four lidar units, and six radar sensors, a 42% reduction in total sensor count compared with the 29 cameras on the fifth-generation I-PACE fleet. Waymo has compensated for the smaller number of sensors by upgrading their quality. The system uses a new 17-megapixel imager that the company says delivers sharper images with better thermal stability, providing an overlapping 360-degree field of view that can identify objects up to 500 metres away in darkness.

The improved lidar can see through heavy rain and snow, and upgraded audio receivers can better detect sirens and other sounds, addressing conditions that previously forced Waymo to suspend service in several cities. Earlier this month, Waymo paused operations in five US cities after a software patch failed to prevent vehicles from driving into standing water.

Morgan Stanley has estimated the Ojai costs roughly $125,000 per unit, compared with approximately $200,000 for the I-PACE. The base vehicle built by Zeekr reportedly costs around $38,000, compared with $75,000 for the Jaguar, and the sixth-generation Driver hardware is expected to cost less than $20,000 per unit, more than a 50% reduction from the previous generation. Waymo plans to have thousands of Ojai vehicles on the road by the end of the year.

The China question

The Ojai’s reliance on Chinese manufacturing has drawn political scrutiny. Zeekr builds the base vehicles at a factory in Ningbo, Zhejiang province, and ships them to Mesa, Arizona, where Waymo fits its autonomous driving hardware. The arrangement subjects the imports to a 100% tariff on Chinese-made electric vehicles, but because Waymo imports stripped-down bodies rather than finished consumer vehicles, the tariff applies to a lower base value of roughly $10,000 to $20,000 per unit, making the cost manageable.

A US senator has publicly questioned the arrangement, and the federal government is tightening restrictions on connected vehicle software from China. The broader autonomous vehicle market is watching closely to see whether geopolitical tensions force Waymo to find a domestic manufacturing partner or whether the tariff structure remains favourable enough to keep the Chinese supply chain intact.

Scale is the strategy

Waymo now delivers more than 500,000 paid rides per week across 10 US metro areas, including San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Austin, Atlanta, Miami, Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, and Orlando. The company is targeting one million weekly rides by the end of 2026 and is laying groundwork for operations in more than 20 additional cities, including international markets like Tokyo and London.

The expansion is backed by a $16 billion funding round completed in February 2026, valuing the company at $110 billion, more than double its $45 billion valuation from 15 months earlier. Alphabet provided roughly $13 billion of the total, with Sequoia Capital, Dragoneer, and DST Global among the external investors. Waymo generates an estimated $350 million in annual recurring revenue and operates at Level 4 autonomy, meaning the vehicle handles all driving tasks in defined conditions without human intervention.

The competitive landscape

Waymo’s lead in commercial robotaxi operations is substantial but not unchallenged. Tesla launched a limited robotaxi service in Austin, relying on cameras alone without lidar, a fundamentally different and cheaper approach that other autonomous vehicle makers have criticised as less safe. Amazon’s Zoox operates roughly 50 robotaxis in San Francisco and Las Vegas and will launch on the Uber app in Las Vegas this summer. Cruise, once Waymo’s closest competitor, suspended operations in 2023 after a pedestrian incident and has been slow to return.

In China, Baidu’s Apollo platform operates commercial robotaxi services in multiple cities. Europe remains largely without robotaxi services, though Waymo’s planned expansion to London would mark the first entry by a major US operator.

The Ojai is Waymo’s answer to the fundamental business problem of autonomous ride-hailing: the vehicles have always been too expensive to scale profitably. A cheaper, purpose-built robotaxi with fewer sensors and better software is the company’s bet that it can turn a technology demonstration into a transport business. Whether the economics work will depend on how quickly it can deploy thousands of Ojai vehicles and whether riders in new cities adopt the service at the same rate as early markets.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna and Jason Hiner/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


It’s been several months since Samsung launched its Galaxy S26 series of phones, so now that the dust has settled, I’m reevaluating them against the industry’s best. That starts with the flagship Galaxy S26 Ultra

Between it and the best iPhone available, the iPhone 17 Pro Max, you might be wondering which one is the better investment. The easy answer is, “Stick with whichever OS you have now,” but in all honesty, both phones are good enough to justify a switch. If you’re going to go, go big! It doesn’t get much bigger than these two powerhouses, so let’s dive in and see which one is the winner.

Also: Google Pixel vs. Samsung Galaxy: I’ve tested both brands extensively, and there’s a clear winner

As it happens, I carry the iPhone 17 Pro Max, and also the latest Android phone, and it doesn’t get much more “latest” than the S26 Ultra, so these opinions are based on prior experience with the S25 Ultra, a good amount of hands-on review time with the S26 Ultra, and the specs we have on hand. 


You should buy the iPhone 17 Pro Max if…

iPhone 17 Pro Max in Cosmic Orange

Jason Hiner/ZDNET

1. You (or your family) are in the Apple ecosystem

Platform lock-in is a thing, and Apple has it better than most. Apple provides an entire ecosystem of devices and cross-device functionality that most other OEMs can’t match. It’s not that Samsung doesn’t have an ecosystem of its own, but Apple’s devices are designed from the ground up to work together. They’re on a level of detail that other ecosystems — including Samsung’s — can’t really compete with.

Also: I tested the iPhone Air for a week, and here’s why 17 Pro Max users shouldn’t sleep on it

Then, there’s the 800-pound gorilla in the room. If your family is also in the Apple ecosystem, there’s even more reason to stay there. One of the reasons I carry an iPhone everywhere is that my kids also have iPhones. “Dad, can you ring my phone?” is a common refrain in my house. Add iMessage and parental controls to that, and there are enough roadblocks to make not carrying an iPhone a pretty big headache.

There are software workarounds for just about everything an iPhone can do with other devices, but they’re just that — workarounds. If you want to be embedded in the Apple ecosystem, there is only one phone category you can carry.

2. You want a phone that just works

It’s a cliché, but it exists for a reason. Apple has a long history of being late to the party with a lot of features, but typically, when they get the feature, it’s very polished. Apple doesn’t take half-steps, and it rarely (though not never) treats its users like beta testers. It will take in the landscape, identify a feature that people like, and make it significantly better than the competition.

Also: I’ve tried every iPhone 17 model, and my golden rule for upgrading is changing in 2025

That philosophy extends to apps built for the platform as well. Apple maintains high standards for its App Store and approval process. I routinely encounter the same app on both platforms: it works flawlessly the first time on an iPhone but struggles on an Android phone. There’s a lot that goes into app development, especially on a platform like Android that can have multiple versions and flavors, so there’s no shade. Apple just delivers a better and more consistent experience.

3. You’re a video shooter

There are multiple reasons why the iPhone 17 Pro Max is the phone to use for video. First and foremost, it is storage. Put simply, the iPhone can get up to 2TB of onboard storage; the S26 Ultra maxes out at 1TB. A terabyte of storage seems like a lot — and it is, but if you’re shooting a ton of 8K or even 4K video, that’s going to chew up your storage in a hurry. This is also a solid argument if you’re a hardcore gamer, as they take up a lot of space these days.

Also: I’ve got one big reason to recommend a year-over-year upgrade to Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max

The iPhone also offers a really great video experience. From shooting in dedicated ProRes Raw mode to open gate shooting, if you’re a filmmaker, you want options, and the iPhone gives you a ton. There are also numerous apps in the App Store that you can use to capture, enhance, and edit your videos. 

Sure, there are apps in the Play Store for Android, but this combination of tools built for filmmakers makes the iPhone 17 Pro Max the phone to get for video enthusiasts.

You should buy the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra if…

Prakhar Khanna holding the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

1. You want the raw power

As recently as two years ago, this heading would have belonged under the iPhone category. But after Qualcomm rolled out the Snapdragon 8 Elite processor for the Galaxy, things changed. Of course, we’re talking about raw numbers here — user experience and vertical integration go a long way on Apple’s side, but Qualcomm’s processors have started to outperform Apple’s on benchmarking apps, and that’s a big deal.

Also: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. Galaxy S25 Ultra: I’ve tried both flagships, and here’s my choice

Processing power is important in the realm of video processing/editing, gaming, and AI. If those are important categories for you, Samsung is the best game in town. The iPhone is a powerful machine, make no mistake, but the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is currently the most powerful phone you can buy at the moment. 

2. You’re all-in on AI 

Samsung Galaxy S26

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Unfortunately, Apple Intelligence has seen a few false starts now. Meanwhile, Samsung and Google keep rolling out AI-powered features one after another. This generation of Samsung phones is no exception, with Galaxy AI taking most of the headlines from this lineup of S26 smartphones. From editing images to the new Now Nudge feature, AI is all over this software release.

One particularly intriguing new feature is Gemini’s ability to summon an Uber with a command. Just tell Gemini where you want to go, and it’ll launch Uber, input the destination, and once you confirm, it’ll summon the car. This is the first of potentially numerous apps and services that can be further automated with AI. 

3. You value your privacy

Apple has always prided itself as a privacy-first company, and that’s fair enough. But Samsung is upping the ante with Privacy Screen, a hardware/software combination that could potentially change how people think about their phones and privacy. Samsung redesigned its screen to feature wide and narrow-angle pixels that the company can, through software, turn off individually to obscure the screen.

Also: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. S24 Ultra: I compared both models, here’s who should upgrade

It doesn’t just block looky-loos in the airplane seat next to you from reading your texts, but because it’s software-driven, you can selectively block specific elements on your screen. So your whole screen is bright and beautiful, but a notification rolls in and only blocks the area where it appears. 

Writer’s choice

Both of these phones are downright fantastic — there’s no question. But at the end of the day, if I had to pick, I’d go with the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. I have a dual-wielding phone lifestyle, but while I value the iPhone 17 Pro Max for its consistency and its comfort, Samsung and Android in general have a wider variety of fun form factors to play with, and that includes a multitude of accessories that you can buy into.

Apple works great within its ecosystem, and it’s just OK with everyone else. Android works very well with just about everything from Windows PCs to a wide variety of smartwatches and Bluetooth accessories. For everything an iPhone can connect to, an Android phone can connect to more. Plus, I didn’t even talk about the stylus here, because while I’m not a huge stylus person, I’m definitely a believer in the “it’s better to have it and not need it” philosophy.

Of course, as I mentioned before, I carry both. But I’m ultimately on Team Android, where I feel there’s more freedom. 

Specifications

iPhone 17 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy S26

Display

6.9 AMOLED with 120Hz, 3000 nits peak

6.9″ QHD AMOLED 120Hz, TBD nits peak

Weight

233g

214g

Processor

Apple A19 Pro

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy

Storage

256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB

256GB, 512GB, 1TB

Battery

5,088mAh, 25W wired charging and 25W wireless charging

5,000mAh, 60W wired charging and 25W wireless charging

Camera

48MP wide / 48MP Ultra Wide / 48MP telephoto (4xx) / 18MP front

200MP wide / 50MP telephoto (5x) / 10MP telephoto (3x) / 50 MP ultrawide / 12MP front

Price

Starting at $1,199

Starting at $1,299





Source link