FortiClient EMS Flaw Actively Exploited in Malware Attacks


CVE-2026-35616: FortiClient EMS Flaw Actively Exploited in Malware Attacks

Pierluigi Paganini
May 28, 2026

A critical FortiClient Endpoint Management Server (EMS) vulnerability patched in April has been exploited in fresh attacks to deploy information-stealing malware, Arctic Wolf reports.

The flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-35616 (CVSS score of 9.1), can be exploited remotely via crafted requests for remote code execution (RCE) and does not require authentication.

Threat actors are exploiting a critical FortiClient EMS flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-35616, to deploy malware on unpatched systems.

Threat actors are exploiting a critical FortiClient EMS vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2026-35616 (CVSS score of 9.1), that allows remote code execution without authentication. Fortinet released fixes in April after confirming zero-day attacks in the wild and urged customers to patch immediately.

The flaw is an improper access control issue that allows attackers to bypass authentication through an API and escalate privileges, posing a serious risk to affected systems.

In May 2026, Arctic Wolf identified attacks targeting systems managed by FortiClient EMS. Attackers used a fake Fortinet patch that actually delivered a credential-stealing malware named EKZ Infostealer. The malware collected browser credentials, stored them in log files, and exfiltrated them over HTTP. Researchers believe threat actors abused FortiClient’s own management features to push malicious PowerShell commands to managed endpoints, turning every connected device into a potential target.

“When specially crafted HTTP requests are sent to certain FortiClient EMS endpoints without valid credentials, the requests are processed as if they were legitimate administrative actions. From that point onward, threat actors can interact with EMS functionality that would normally require administrative access.” reads the report published by Arctic Wolf. “Threat actors disguised the credential stealer payload as a Fortinet endpoint update, silently executing the malicious executable through PowerShell.”

Fortinet released out-of-band patches for the critical FortiClient EMS vulnerability in early April. Fortinet confirmed active exploitation of the flaw and urges users of FortiClient EMS 7.4.5 and 7.4.6 to install available hotfixes. A permanent fix will also be included in version 7.4.7.

“An Improper Access Control vulnerability [CWE-284] in FortiClient EMS may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests.” reads the advisory published by Fortinet. “Fortinet has observed this to be exploited in the wild and urges vulnerable customers to install the hotfix for FortiClient EMS 7.4.5 and 7.4.6”

In April, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added the flaw CVE-2026-35616 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, FortiClient)







Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Samsung is facing a fresh legal challenge that could put a big red “Stop” sign for its foldable phones in the US. Lepton Computing LLC has just filed a lawsuit in a Texas federal court, accusing the South Korean tech giant and its US arm of infringing multiple patents related to foldable phone technology.

If the legal action escalates, it could impact sales of Samsung’s Galaxy Z lineup, which includes the Fold, Flip, and new TriFold models.

What the lawsuit claims

In the legal filing, which was later covered by The Biz, Lepton alleges that Samsung is using patented technologies for flexible display structure, hinge mechanism, and user interface behaviors without authorization. The company claims that it developed these ideas years prior to these foldable phones hitting the market.

The patents in question include concepts around how foldable displays operate and how software adapts to the changing screen states. Both of these are practically central to modern foldable devices. Now, Lepton is seeking damages. But what’s more notable is that it’s pushing for a potential ban on Samsung’s foldable phones in the US market.

What’s the verdict?

Keep in mind that claiming patent infringement is not the same as actually proving it. Patent disputes in the tech industry are often complex due to overlapping ideas, prior art, and competing claims. While Lepton does hold patents related to foldable technology, this doesn’t immediately prove that Samsung has violated them.

Samsung already has an extensive portfolio of patents around foldable tech that it has built over years of research and development, which will likely play a central role if the case does end up moving forward.

Why does this matter, and what happens next?

Samsung is one of the largest brands in the foldable phone market, especially in the US, where the only real competition is Motorola’s Razr series. So any disruption could have notable effects across the entire segment. In the extreme scenario that Samsung does get barred from selling foldables in the US, Apple’s upcoming foldable iPhone could enter the market with virtually no competition.

At the moment, this is still in the early stages of a legal battle. Cases like this can often take years to resolve, with the outcomes usually involving a hefty settlement. Till then, it remains a developing story.



Source link