SpaceX did not commit to a multi-year lease of its Memphis Colossus 1 cluster to Anthropic, Elon Musk said on Wednesday, describing the agreement as 180 days with a 90-day mutual cancellation right.
Elon Musk has clarified that SpaceX did not commit to a multi-year lease of its Colossus 1 data centre to Anthropic, contradicting widely reported framing of the deal as a $1.25bn-per-month, three-year arrangement running through May 2029.
The agreement, Musk said in posts on his X account on Wednesday, is in fact a 180-day base lease with a mutual 90-day cancellation right on either side after that.
“The short term was our request, not Anthropic’s,” Musk wrote. “We won’t leave them hanging and will provide a reasonable off-ramp, but if compute gets super tight I said we might need it back at some point.”
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
The clarification matters because it lands inside the SpaceX IPO roadshow window. The company filed for its public listing last week.
The S-1 mentions a 90-day mutual cancellation provision on the Anthropic agreement but does not, as initially reported, anchor the deal at the six-month base term Musk has now publicly named.
The disclosure gap, combined with the visible revision of the deal duration in public Musk statements, will be one of the questions analysts and prospective LPs press on during the roadshow that starts in earnest in June.
The underlying transaction is itself worth recapping. Anthropic announced earlier this month that it had taken access to the full compute capacity of Colossus 1, the Memphis facility built originally to train xAI’s Grok. Colossus 1 houses more than 220,000 Nvidia GPUs and provides over 300 megawatts of compute capacity.
The published monthly rent figure was $1.25bn. Anthropic immediately used the new compute headroom to raise rate limits on Claude Code and Opus API customers, citing the SpaceX deal specifically.
xAI had by then moved its own model training to Colossus 2, a newer and larger facility, leaving Colossus 1 available for external lease.
What changed today is the lease-term reading. A 180-day base term with 90-day post-base cancellation is a meaningfully different commercial commitment from a 36-month contract.
For SpaceX, the short term retains flexibility to reclaim compute if Grok training demand or other internal SpaceX-xAI requirements spike.
For Anthropic, it means the Colossus capacity is a useful near-term bridge rather than the structural data-centre anchor analysts had read it as.
Anthropic’s public posture around the deal, particularly the Claude rate-limit increases announced earlier this month, presumed a longer-term arrangement than Musk has now confirmed.
The IPO-disclosure question is the part SEC lawyers will care about. SpaceX is a private company filing for a public listing. Material commercial agreements with revenue impact are required disclosure.
A 36-month deal worth $45bn cumulative ($1.25bn × 36) is structurally different from a 6-month deal with mutual cancellation worth at most $7.5bn ($1.25bn × 6) if no extension is negotiated.
The S-1’s mention of the 90-day cancellation provision but not the 180-day base term sits in the gap between the two readings.
The Musk-Anthropic relationship is itself the contextual oddity. Musk has spent the past two years publicly describing Anthropic as “Misanthropic” and as a competitor to xAI.
The Colossus 1 rental to Anthropic was already commercially logical given xAI’s capacity utilisation and SpaceX’s IPO timing. Today’s revision suggests Musk now wants the flexibility to walk it back if circumstances change.
Neither SpaceX nor Anthropic separately commented on the lease-term clarification through formal channels. The SpaceX IPO roadshow is scheduled to begin on 8 June.
Lincolns often get written off as just fancy Fords, but that really undersells what they’re trying to do. Sure, they share parts underneath, but Lincoln usually goes all-in on making things feel quieter, softer, and more premium inside.
A good example is the Lincoln MKC from about a decade ago. It’s closely related to the Ford Escape, but the way it drives and feels puts it closer to compact luxury SUVs like the BMW X3 than you might expect.
Fast-forward to today, and depreciation has done its thing. That same MKC has quietly become a bit of a bargain if you’re shopping used and trying to avoid modern new-car prices.
In order to give you the most up-to-date and accurate information possible, the data used to compile this article was sourced from BMW and Lincoln, as well as other authoritative sources including CarBuzz, CarComplaints (1/2), and RepairPal.
Even the most affordable cars now offer luxury experiences with advanced technology and premium comforts once reserved for high-end models.
Lincoln’s quiet shift into compact luxury
How the brand moved beyond its old-school limo image
Credit: Lincoln
For a long time, Lincoln was all about big, plush sedans and the heavyweight Navigator SUV. It wasn’t really a brand people thought of for small, everyday crossovers.
That started to change when luxury makers began chasing more mainstream buyers with compact SUVs. Lincoln stepped in with models like the MKC, especially after Mercury was shut down in 2010 and Ford needed Lincoln to cover more of that “premium but not outrageous” space.
Lincoln jumped straight into the segment with the MKC, which first appeared as a lightly disguised concept at the 2013 Detroit Auto Show. It then reappeared later that year in near-production form at the Los Angeles Auto Show.
Credit: NetCarShow.com
Sales began for the 2015 model year, backed by a marketing push starring Matthew McConaughey. His moody, slow-burn commercials helped give Lincoln a more modern image and got people talking.
The strategy worked, especially with younger luxury buyers. Around half of MKC buyers were new to Lincoln, many coming from Mercedes, Lexus, and BMW.
The MKC shared its front-wheel-drive architecture with the third-generation Ford Escape and stayed on sale through 2020 before being replaced by the current Lincoln Corsair. Despite that mainstream foundation, it still managed to feel properly upscale in day-to-day driving.
It launched at just under $34,000 for 2015 and came loaded with features, punchy turbocharged engines, and one of the quieter, more relaxed rides in its class. For a vehicle with Escape roots, it did a surprisingly good job of feeling like something more premium.
Credit: NetCarShow.com
Lincoln gave the MKC a pretty big refresh for 2019, and that’s the version most buyers should be looking at today. It brought a cleaner front-end design, a nicer interior, and more standard tech across the board.
On top of that, it refined what was already a fairly comfortable, quiet SUV. The result is a 2019 MKC that feels even more like a genuine alternative to the BMW X3 than earlier models did.
This hidden gem from GM may outshine the NX terms of value and features.
How the MKC holds up today
A budget luxury SUV that still feels surprisingly refined
The 2019 MKC came with two turbocharged four-cylinder engines, with the more powerful one reserved for higher trims. That engine was paired exclusively with all-wheel drive, pushing fully-loaded Black Label models close to $50,000.
By comparison, the 2019 BMW X3 started around $41,000 with its turbo four, offering similar real-world performance but in a more tightly engineered package. The Lincoln doesn’t really try to win on dynamics—it leans hard on equipment instead.
Even base MKC models were well-equipped with 18-inch wheels, a power tailgate, parking sensors, remote start, a Wi-Fi hotspot, Apple CarPlay, and Android Auto. Forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking were standard, while blind-spot monitoring, lane-keeping assist, cross-traffic alert, and active park assist were available higher up the range.
The X3, despite its higher price, made Apple CarPlay part of an optional package and didn’t offer Android Auto at all.
Inside, the MKC is very much focused on comfort. The front seats are soft, supportive, and come standard with heating, which on the X3 was only available through an extra package.
You also get 12-way power adjustment with four-way lumbar support, while the BMW sticks to 10-way seats without power lumbar adjustment. It’s a clear win for the Lincoln on everyday comfort and convenience.
Materials up front are generally decent, but things do feel a bit cheaper as you move into the rear. Rear headroom is also on the tight side, especially with the panoramic roof, and that’s where the X3 pulls ahead.
The BMW also has a noticeable advantage when it comes to cargo space.
Make and model
2019 Lincoln MKC
2019 BMW X3
Headroom front / rear
39.6 inches / 38.7 inches
41.1 inches / 39.1 inches
Legroom front / rear
42.8 inches / 36.8 inches
40.3 inches / 36.4 inches
Cargo space behind rear seats / maximum
25.2 cu ft / 53.1 cu ft
28.7 cu ft / 62.7 cu ft
Dimensions L/W/H
179.2 inches / 73.4 inches / 65.2 inches
185.9 inches / 74.4 inches / 66.0 inches
On the road, the MKC is more composed than you’d expect, and even a bit sporty if it’s fitted with the adaptive dampers. It doesn’t come close to the X3 for steering sharpness or overall balance, but it’s more capable than its comfort-first image suggests.
The BMW still feels like the better driver’s SUV, thanks to its rear-wheel-drive foundation. It delivers tighter body control, better feedback, and a more cohesive feel overall.
The MKC’s engines are responsive enough for everyday driving, but they’re not exactly exciting. The X3, on the other hand, feels more energetic across the board, with a sharper turbo four and a much stronger inline-six option—though you’ll pay a lot more for it.
BMW has just revealed its all-new 2026 iX3, a sleek electric SUV designed to rival Tesla with cutting-edge tech, bold design, and impressive range.
What you’ll pay for a used MKC today
Luxury SUV comfort without the luxury price tag
Looking on the CarBuzz Marketplace, used MKCs are still surprisingly affordable, even for later models with lower mileage. As mentioned earlier, the 2019 version is the one to aim for thanks to its updated styling, tech, and overall refinement.
With around $15,000 to spend, you get a lot of SUV for the money considering the standard equipment. Prices can start near $10,000, but those examples usually come with well over 100,000 miles.
Push closer to that $15,000 mark and the options open up quite a bit. Clean 2019 MKCs with around 60,000 miles or less start to become realistic, making it feel like a proper bargain.
Most listings come with the standard 2.0-liter turbo engine, while AWD typically doesn’t add much to the price. The more powerful 2.3-liter turbo usually costs a bit more, often a couple thousand dollars extra.
Credit: NetCarShow.com
Compared to the 2019 BMW X3, the MKC looks even more tempting, since clean X3s with under 100,000 miles rarely drop below the $15,000 mark. Based on CarBuzz pricing trends, the BMW typically costs about $4,300 more on average, although there are far more listings to choose from.
That said, there are a few things to keep in mind. The 2019 MKC has above-average reliability ratings from RepairPal, but it’s not completely trouble-free.
CarComplaints has reported recurring engine issues, especially coolant intrusion problems with the 2.0-liter that can lead to serious failures. The optional 2.3-liter turbo is generally considered the safer bet, with stronger performance and better long-term durability.
Earlier MKCs can show similar issues, so it’s important to check service history carefully. A full pre-purchase inspection is a must before committing to any example.
Credit: NetCarShow.com
The 2019 X3 generally scores better for reliability, but it’s still not completely problem-free. CarComplaints notes reports of coolant leaks, cooling system failures, and the odd electronic issue, especially as mileage climbs.
The six-cylinder models tend to be seen as the most solid and desirable, but they also come with a much higher price tag on the used market. And like most older BMWs, running costs and repairs can end up being noticeably higher than what you’d typically see with domestic brands.
These 10 used hybrids offer premium features, smooth rides, and great efficiency—proving you don’t need to spend big for luxury.
Luxury SUV value, but not without trade-offs
Big comfort and low prices, balanced by a few ownership risks
Credit: NetCarShow.com
For buyers willing to live with a few compromises, the Lincoln MKC offers a lot of luxury SUV for not much money. A clean 2019 example can undercut a comparable BMW X3 by thousands while still bringing strong comfort, plenty of features, and decent performance.
That said, it’s not a totally worry-free buy. Known issues—especially around the 2.0-liter engine—can take some of the shine off the deal. Shopping carefully and leaving room in the budget for potential repairs is key if the MKC’s bargain pricing is going to stay that way.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
