Dutch police seize 800 servers linked to Russian hackers



TL;DR

Dutch financial crime investigators seized 800 servers and arrested two men who allegedly provided hosting infrastructure to the Kremlin-linked hacking group NoName057(16). The servers, operated by WorkTitans and MIRhosting, were linked to sanctions-evading entities controlled by two EU-blacklisted Moldovan brothers.

Dutch financial crime investigators have seized 800 servers and arrested two men in a crackdown on hosting companies that provided infrastructure for Russian state-sponsored cyberattacks across Europe. The Dutch Fiscal Information and Investigation Service (FIOD) raided two data centres last week and shut down servers operated by WorkTitans and MIRhosting, two companies suspected of violating EU sanctions by renting server space to entities controlled by sanctioned individuals.

The arrests targeted Youssef Zinad, the 57-year-old owner of WorkTitans, and Andrey Nesterenko, the 39-year-old founder of MIRhosting. Nesterenko, a Russian citizen based in the Netherlands, is a prize-winning concert pianist. He denied wrongdoing in a LinkedIn message, saying he had cut off the relationship with the sanctioned individuals after they were blacklisted and that MIRhosting had not seen anything suspicious originating from its network.

The sanctions trail

The case traces back to Iurie and Ivan Neculiti, two Moldovan brothers who ran Stark Industries Solutions, a hosting company that became one of the most prolific enablers of Russian cyberattacks in Europe after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. In May 2025, the European Union sanctioned the Neculiti brothers and their companies for helping Russian state-sponsored hackers conduct cyberattacks, disinformation campaigns, and other destabilising activities against EU member states.

But the brothers reportedly received advance warning. According to Krebs on Security, they learned of the forthcoming sanctions roughly 12 days before the announcement when Moldovan and EU media reported on the pending blacklisting. Stark Industries rebranded to THE.hosting and transferred its operations to WorkTitans BV, the Dutch entity now at the centre of the investigation. The infrastructure that powered the attacks simply moved to a new corporate shell in the Netherlands, continuing to operate from the same physical servers.

NoName057(16) and the gamification of cyberwar

The servers seized in the Dutch raids were linked to NoName057(16), a pro-Russian hacktivist group that has conducted distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks against government websites, banking services, and critical infrastructure across Europe since 2022. The group floods targeted websites with traffic until they go offline, a simple but effective technique that has disrupted everything from Danish government agencies to the French postal service.

NoName057(16) is not a freelance operation. The US Justice Department has identified it as a covert project that includes employees of a Kremlin-backed organisation called the Center for the Study and Network Monitoring of the Youth Environment. The group runs a daily leaderboard that ranks volunteers by the number of attacks they launch and rewards the most productive contributors with cryptocurrency. It has turned cyberattacks into a gamified competition, incentivising mass participation in what amounts to state-sponsored digital sabotage.

WorkTitans and MIRhosting were the most-used networks in a series of pro-Russian attacks against Danish government organisations over several days in November 2025, according to an investigation by the Dutch newspaper Volkskrant. Over Christmas, NoName057(16) hit France’s postal service and delayed package deliveries across the country.

Why the Netherlands keeps showing up

The Dutch raids highlight a structural problem in European cybersecurity. Russian-linked hacking groups depend on hosting infrastructure within Western countries to launch their attacks, and the Netherlands, home to some of Europe’s largest internet exchanges, is a particularly attractive location. The Netherlands has led some of Europe’s largest cybercrime operations, including Operation Endgame in 2024, which targeted botnets responsible for hundreds of millions of euros in damages.

The problem is speed, or the lack of it. Cian Heasley, principal consultant at UK cybersecurity firm Acumen Cyber, told Bloomberg that Russian hackers rely on Western hardware more than they like to admit, making them vulnerable to police action. But they get away with it because of how long it takes law enforcement to shut down rogue hosting companies. By the time investigators build a case and obtain warrants, the infrastructure has often been replicated elsewhere.

The Dutch seizure is not the first time law enforcement has targeted NoName057(16)’s infrastructure. In July 2025, a Europol-coordinated operation took down 100 servers that the group had apparently rented to power its attacks. The fact that 800 more servers were seized less than a year later suggests the group rebuilt its capacity quickly, likely by routing through the same sanctions-evading corporate structures that the Neculiti brothers set up before they were blacklisted.

The limits of enforcement

The arrests of Zinad and Nesterenko represent a rare case of law enforcement reaching the human operators behind the hosting infrastructure rather than just seizing hardware. But the broader enforcement challenge remains. Europe was the most targeted region for cyberattacks in 2023, accounting for 32% of global incidents, and state-linked sabotage attacks on European infrastructure roughly tripled between 2023 and 2024.

The DDoS attacks conducted by NoName057(16) are not sophisticated. They do not steal data or compromise systems. They simply knock websites offline, creating visible disruption that serves Russia’s broader information warfare strategy. The damage is measured in lost public confidence, disrupted government services, and the cumulative cost of defending against attacks that are cheap to launch but expensive to absorb.

Seizing 800 servers and arresting two suspects is a significant operational result. But as NATO and European governments invest in cyber defence capabilities, the underlying problem persists: hosting infrastructure in democratic countries with strong internet connectivity will continue to be attractive to state-sponsored attackers precisely because it is fast, reliable, and, until someone files charges, legal.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


The Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid has quickly become the default choice for buyers looking to step into an affordable hybrid SUV. It’s practical, efficient, and backed by a reputation that makes it an easy recommendation. But when you look beyond the badge, it’s no longer the clear-cut value leader it appears to be.

One Korean rival from Kia quietly outperforms it where it matters most. It’s cheaper to buy, significantly more fuel-efficient, and offers a more refined and spacious experience, despite targeting the same budget-conscious buyers. Instead of just meeting expectations, it raises them for what an entry-level hybrid SUV should deliver.

That’s what makes this comparison so one-sided. When a vehicle costs less while doing more, using less fuel, offering more room, and feeling more polished, it stops being an alternative and starts looking like the obvious choice.

In order to give you the most up-to-date and accurate information possible, the data used to compile this article was sourced from various manufacturer websites, including the EPA.


2026 Toyota Crown Signia


This Toyota hybrid beats Acura, Genesis, and even Lexus where it matters most

The Toyota Crown Signia does more than keep up. In several categories, it sets the pace.

There aren’t many small hybrid SUVs, but the Kia Niro is the best

Easily the most budget-friendly crossover on the market

Hybrid crossovers are a really attractive proposition. You get the added practicality of an SUV and fuel efficiency that keeps your monthly fuel bills low. Perhaps the most obvious choice here, especially if you’re on a tight budget, is the Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid. However, if you’re looking for the best bang for your buck, and the most efficiency, then the Kia Niro remains king of the subcompact SUV segment.

2026 Kia Niro Hybrid trims and pricing

Models

Starting MSRP

LX

$27,390

EX

$30,190

SX

$33,390

SX Touring

$35,790

As we’ve already mentioned, the Corolla Cross Hybrid is kind of the benchmark for small hybrid SUVs, with its badge definitely helping make it so popular. The Toyota has a starting price of $29,395, meaning it is just over $2,000 more expensive than the Kia. Despite this, we think even the most affordable Niro Hybrid feels more refined, better equipped, and, to top it all off, its more efficient.

With the Niro being one of the most affordable crossovers on the market, you have a little wiggle room when it comes to trims. We still wouldn’t climb the ladder far, as we think the EX offers the best bang for your buck. It comes with niceties like a smartphone charging pad, faux-leather upholstery, and an upgraded infotainment screen. The Premium package is also definitely worth the extra $2,000, adding things like a panoramic sunroof, a power-operated tailgate, and a premium sound system.


Front 3/4 shot of a red 2024 Mazda MX-5 Miata RF driving on a winding road with the ocean in the background.


These 5 sporty cars keep smiles high and fuel bills low

Fun behind the wheel doesn’t have to mean pain at the pump.

Neither are particularly entertaining, but the Niro is lighter on fuel

Beating Toyota at the hybrid game isn’t easy

Toyota is one of the most experienced automakers out there when it comes to building hybrid powertrains, with the Japanese brand being a big proponent of the setup. This is why it’s so impressive that the little Niro comes out ahead when it comes to efficiency. On top of this, Kia has delivered a more refined driving experience that feels better than you’d expect considering the price you pay.

Kia Niro Hybrid performance and efficiency


980919-1.jpg

kia-logo.jpeg

Base Trim Engine

1.6L I4 Hybrid

Base Trim Transmission

6-speed auto-shift manual

Base Trim Drivetrain

Front-Wheel Drive

Base Trim Horsepower

103.5 HP @5700 RPM

Base Trim Torque

106.3 lb.-ft. @ 4000 RPM

Base Trim Fuel Economy (city/highway/combined)

53/54/53 MPG

Base Trim Battery Type

Lithium polymer (LiPo)

Make

Kia

Model

Niro



The Corolla Cross Hybrid has a little more grunt than the Kia, putting down 196 horsepower versus the Niro’s dinky 139 horses. The 1.6-liter engine in the Korean crossover is an underachiever, which is why it takes around 8.9 seconds to get up to 60 miles per hour. With both of these crossovers being more urban crawlers than highway cruisers, we don’t think that lack of power is the end of the world.

There really isn’t a winner when it comes to driving engagement here, with both small SUVs being exceptionally dull to drive. However, the Kia Niro does come feature a pretty plush ride quality. It also gets a six-speed DCT instead of the CVT in the Corolla, which results in less droning when accelerating, resulting in a more refined experience.

Fuel economy

Model

City

Highway

Combined

Kia Niro FE

53 MPG

54 MPG

53 MPG

Kia Niro

53 MPG

45 MPG

49 MPG

Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid

46 MPG

39 MPG

42 MPG

Efficiency is a massive reason to pick a Kia Niro over a Corolla Cross Hybrid. The base model Niro is rated for up to 53 miles per gallon combined, with every other model managing 49 miles per gallon combined. This means that even the least efficient Niro is rated to get seven more miles per gallon than a Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid.


2027 Hyundai IONIQ 9 AWD Performance Calligraphy Black Ink


This Hyundai SUV takes three-row EV luxury into new territory

Hyundai IONIQ 9 AWD Performance Calligraphy Black Ink reveal

Kia delivers a sleek and stylish interior in the 2026 Niro

Meanwhile, the Corolla Cross is a bit boring

Toyota has always been known to value simplicity, and this has often resulted in somewhat underwhelming interiors. While there isn’t anything wrong with the cabin of the Corolla Cross, and it does come well-equipped, it does lean a little too far in the utilitarian direction. The Niro, on the other hand, finds a good middle ground between simplicity and modernity.

Interior dimensions and comfort

Model

Kia Niro Hybrid

Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid

Front row headroom

40.5 inches

38.6 inches

Front row legroom

41.5 inches

42.9 inches

Second row headroom

39.6 inches

39 inches

Second row legroom

39.8 inches

32 inches

Cargo capacity (behind second row)

22.8 cubic feet

21.5 cubic feet

Both the Niro and the Corolla Cross feel very practical for cheap subcompact SUVs, but the Kia has a pretty clear advantage. The Niro offers a much more spacious rear row of seats, with tons of legroom. You’d have no problem fitting even particularly tall passengers in the rear seats. It also does have a slightly more spacious cargo hold, though the difference here is much smaller.

Both the Corolla Cross and Niro have similar philosophies regarding interior design, but with some differences in execution. Both aim for basic functionality, but the Kia does it in a much more contemporary way. It’s obvious at all times that both crossovers are budget-oriented, in no small part thanks to the cheap plastics used, but build quality is good. The Kia also offers a few upscale touches that put it ahead of its Japanese rival, especially on higher trim levels.

Infotainment and technology

There is very little competition between the Niro and Corolla Cross when it comes to tech features. Both come standard with an eight-inch infotainment screen to start, with a 10.3-inch screen available on every trim but the base Niro and a 10.5-inch screen being optional in the Corolla Cross.

The two budget crossovers are fairly evenly matched when it comes to other tech features. Things like smartphone mirroring and a wireless smartphone charging pad are available on the Kia and Toyota. One key difference is the optional sound systems, with the Niro’s seven-speaker Harman/Kardon sound system performing much better than the optional JBL system in the Corolla Cross.


Cheaper, more efficient, and more refined

When comparing these two small crossovers side-by-side, it’s really hard to make a case for the Toyota. The Corolla Cross does have more power and comes with the peace of mind you get from the Toyota badge, but in just about every other way the Kia feels like the better deal. For less money, you’re getting a crossover that is more spacious, less boring on the inside, and far more efficient. In just about every way, the Niro is a more successful budget hybrid crossover.



Source link