Sony’s MiniDisc was better than the CD, but one fatal flaw ruined it


It’s no exaggeration to say that the Compact Disc (CD) dominated the ’90s. It’s really a technology of the ’80s, but the ’90s is when the format peaked, and when its most likely threat arose, and failed.

Sony and Philips co-developed the CD standard, which makes it ironic that it was Sony’s MiniDisc which aimed straight for CD’s crown. In many ways it was the superior format, but as history has shown time and time again, being better on paper does not guarantee success.

Too soon and too late at the same time

When Sony launched MiniDisc in 1992, the average person’s experience with digital media was mostly read-only. Even though we all could listen to pristine digital music, if you wanted to make your own recording you had one option, and that option was cassette tapes.

MiniDisc combines the optical technology of CDs with the magnetic technology of tapes, floppies, hard drives, and other magnetic storage devices. It’s “magneto-optical.”

A MiniDisc can be rewritten thousands of times without degrading like a tape. You could record digital music, erase it, rename songs, make playlists, and keep using the same disc for a long time.

Today, with our fully digital music player software on phones and computers, this sounds absolutely pedestrian. In the early ’90s, this was basically science fiction come to life. Remember that CD-RW technology would only appear towards the end of the decade, so there was literally nothing else like it.

MiniDisc, as the name suggests, was also designed from the start to be a portable format. Sony has pioneered the DiscMan and portable CD players as a whole, but the size of the discs meant there was a limit on how compact they could be. The little floppy-sized MiniDiscs meant much smaller players were possible. MiniDiscs stay inside a plastic caddy, making them much more durable too.

Quiz
8 Questions · Test Your Knowledge

The wild world of pre-cloud data storage
Trivia challenge

Before the cloud, we had spinning disks and prayer — see how much you remember about the glory days of physical storage.

Floppy DisksOptical MediaTape DrivesCapacityHistory

The iconic 3.5-inch floppy disk that dominated the ’90s had a maximum storage capacity of how much?

Correct! The standard 3.5-inch high-density floppy held 1.44 MB — barely enough for a handful of Word documents by modern standards. It’s wild to think entire operating systems were once distributed on stacks of these little guys.

Not quite! The correct answer is 1.44 MB. While 2.88 MB ‘extended density’ floppies did exist, they were rare and barely caught on — 1.44 MB was the reigning champion of the floppy era.

Which company invented the floppy disk in the late 1960s?

That’s right — IBM invented the floppy disk, with the first 8-inch version arriving around 1971. The project was led by David Noble, and the goal was simply to load microcode into the IBM System/370 mainframe. Nobody predicted it would reshape personal computing.

Close guess, but it was IBM! The floppy disk was born from a very unglamorous need: getting microcode into mainframes. IBM engineer David Noble led the effort, and the resulting 8-inch disk quietly launched a storage revolution.

What does ‘CD-R’ stand for, and what makes it different from a regular CD?

Nailed it! CD-R stands for Compact Disc – Recordable, and once you burned data onto it, that data was there forever — or until you left it face-down on a desk for a week. The ‘burning’ process literally used a laser to make permanent marks in a dye layer.

Not quite! CD-R stands for Compact Disc – Recordable. The key word is ‘once’ — you could write to it, but never erase or change it. That’s what separated it from the CD-RW (Rewritable), which let you wipe and reuse the disc.

Magnetic tape storage is considered ancient history, but it’s still widely used today for what purpose?

You got it! Magnetic tape never died — it just moved to the basement. Huge organizations like banks, studios, and cloud providers still use tape for cold storage because it’s incredibly cheap per gigabyte and can last decades. Modern tape cartridges can hold tens of terabytes each.

Surprisingly, tape is still very much alive! The correct answer is enterprise backup and archiving. While it sounds prehistoric, modern tape cartridges hold tens of terabytes and cost pennies per gigabyte compared to hard drives, making them a go-to for cold storage in 2024.

The original 8-inch floppy disk shrank to 5.25 inches, then to 3.5 inches. What was the defining physical feature of the 3.5-inch design that made it more durable?

Double win! The 3.5-inch floppy had both a rigid hard plastic shell AND a sliding metal shutter that covered the read/write slot when the disk wasn’t in use. This made it far tougher than the floppy 5.25-inch version, which you could literally bend — and ruin — with your bare hands.

Almost! The answer is actually both B and C. The 3.5-inch floppy’s genius was combining a rigid plastic shell with a sliding metal shutter over the data slot. The 5.25-inch predecessor had a flexible sleeve and an always-exposed slot, making it easy to accidentally destroy.

When burning a music CD in the late ’90s and early 2000s, what was the dreaded consequence of a ‘buffer underrun’ error?

Correct, and painful! A buffer underrun happened when your PC couldn’t feed data to the CD burner fast enough, causing the laser to stop mid-burn. Since the disc was already partially written, it became a shiny, expensive coaster. This is why people would nervously avoid touching their computer during a burn.

Oh, if only it had just slowed down! The correct answer is that the disc was permanently ruined. A buffer underrun broke the continuous writing process, leaving the disc in a half-written, unreadable limbo with no recovery option. Losing a blank CD-R was a real sting back when they weren’t exactly cheap.

The Iomega Zip disk was a popular storage solution in the mid-to-late ’90s. What was the capacity of the original Zip disk?

Exactly right — 100 MB! At a time when floppy disks maxed out at 1.44 MB, the Zip disk felt almost sci-fi. Graphic designers and digital photographers loved them. Later versions bumped up to 250 MB and even 750 MB, but the original 100 MB model was the one that made everyone’s jaw drop.

The original Zip disk held 100 MB — a staggering amount compared to the 1.44 MB floppy it was meant to replace. Iomega later released 250 MB and 750 MB versions, but the 100 MB original is the one that defined the brand and earned it a cult following in the late ’90s.

The ‘Click of Death’ was a notorious failure symptom associated with which storage device?

Spot on! The Iomega Zip drive became infamous for its ‘Click of Death’ — a rhythmic clicking sound that signaled imminent drive or disk failure. Worse, an infected drive could corrupt every disk inserted into it, spreading the problem. It became one of the most dreaded sounds in ’90s computing.

The culprit was the Iomega Zip drive! Its ‘Click of Death’ was a repetitive clicking sound that meant the drive head was failing — and it could corrupt every disk you inserted afterward, spreading data loss like a disease. It’s still considered one of the most notorious hardware failures of the personal computing era.

Challenge Complete

Your Score

/ 8

Thanks for playing!

MiniDisc fixed many of the problems people hated about CDs and tapes

The best of both worlds

All of these features addressed the list of issues people had with CDs. It combined the best parts of CDs and cassette tapes without the drawbacks of either. Tapes were recordable and portable, but wore out and sounded awful compared to CDs.

CDs had better audio quality (we’ll get to that), but they were also relatively fragile, too big to be properly portable, and up to that point very prone to skipping in portable form. In the ’90s, portable CD players solved the problem by putting big, expensive RAM buffers into the system to absorb the bumps. In 1992, this wasn’t really a thing yet. So MiniDisc was the ultimate in portable music quality and convenience.

Musicians and people who had to make field recordings came to love MiniDisc. You could record high quality audio outside of a studio, pretty much anywhere. Up to that point, you had to use tape, and even the best portable tape solutions had quality limits. It found a place for recording live performances, interviews, lectures, and other similar events.

Philips Portable CD Player Bluetooth with Cassette

Bluetooth Connectivity?

Yes

Brand

Philips

The Philips Portable CD Player Boombox takes the company’s years of experience with the boombox format and adds plenty of modern connectivity and features. Playback from CD, cassette, USB, or Bluetooth, all while kicking back and controlling everything with the included remote.


Sony’s compression technology was both the secret weapon and the fatal flaw

Audiophiles strike again

Portable MiniDisc player with a disc inserted, surrounded by wired headphones on a blue background. Credit: SOLDATOOFF/Shutterstock.com

So what about listening to music at home? Home MiniDisc players did exist, and it was a viable home music format. In fact, it’s convenient to take the music from your portable player and putting into your MinDisc deck. If your existing CD player or Hi-Fi receiver had a line-in jack, you could just hook up your portable player, of course.

But, listening to music at home on a proper Hi-Fi exposed the flaws in the format. Sony relied on a proprietary compression system called ATRAC (Adaptive Transform Acoustic Coding). It was the only way to fit that much music on a disc that small. This offered near-CD quality, but that’s not CD quality.

Early revisions of ATRAC were more obviously lossy to the human ear, and even though the algorithm improved over the years, MiniDisc’s reputation as the “compressed” option stuck. It also didn’t help that MiniDisc was a more closed ecosystem than CD. This is a pattern we’d see Sony repeat later with its proprietary memory cards for cameras, and the expensive format it developed for the PlayStation Vita.


MP3 players, cheap CD-Rs, and flash storage killed it almost overnight

It’s ironic that the perception of compressed audio was a sticking point for some people, because the 128Kbps or worse MP3s that everyone was sharing and listening to in the latter half of the ’90s and 2000s sounded obviously worse than CDs and MiniDisc.

It turns out that audio quality means much less to the general music-listening public than low cost and convenience. Today we can have it all, but maybe if Sony had played things a little less close to its chest, we’d all be using MiniDiscs in 2026 and beyond.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Three-row family SUVs are expected to do everything; carry passengers comfortably, handle long road trips, keep running costs manageable, and remain dependable for years. Finding one that checks every box without becoming too expensive can be difficult, especially when fuel economy starts to matter as much as space. One hybrid Toyota stands out by delivering all of those priorities in a single package.

This three-row SUV combines the practicality families need with the efficiency advantages of hybrid power. It offers spacious seating, strong everyday comfort, and the kind of long-term reliability Toyota is known for, while using significantly less fuel than many traditional V-6 rivals in the same segment.

For buyers balancing family needs with ownership costs, that combination makes a major difference. It proves that a large SUV doesn’t have to be expensive to run or stressful to own, just thoughtfully engineered around what families actually need most.

In order to give you the most up-to-date and accurate information possible, the data used to compile this article was sourced from various manufacturer websites, including the EPA, CarEdge, and J.D. Power.

Mercedes-Benz 2027 C-Class Electric


Mercedes’ 2027 electric C-Class is its sportiest version yet—EV or not

You can also expect long range and ample in-cabin tech.

The 2026 Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid is affordable and built to last

Dependability is a big priority here

If you’re looking for a family SUV that is spacious, light on gas, and will last you a long time with few issues, then the Grand Highlander Hybrid feels like a no-brainer. It is slightly pricier than some of its direct rivals, but Toyota’s experience in developing hybrid means that you can rest peacefully knowing that this three-row SUV should last you years without any problem.

2026 Toyota Grand Highlander Hybrid trims and pricing

Model

Starting MSRP

LE

$45,210

XLE

$46,380

Limited

$52,710

Nightshade Edition

$53,690

Platinum

$59,775

Compared to other hybrid three-row SUVs, the Grand Highlander is priced pretty well. While there are some more affordable options, like the Hyundai Palisade and Santa Fe, it undercuts rivals like the Kia Telluride and the Mazda CX-90. This middle of the pack pricing is about on-par for Toyota.

Of the above trims, we think that opting for the XLE gets you the best bang for your buck. It comes with all the features you’d want in a family hauler, such as a power-operated liftgate, a spattering of USB-C ports throughout the cabin, heated front seats, faux-leather upholstery, and a very comprehensive suite of driver aids.

Warranties, maintenance, and reliability

  • Reliability score: 82/100 (J.D. Power)
  • Limited warranty: 3 years or 36,000 miles
  • Powertrain warranty: 5 years or 60,000 miles
  • Complimentary maintenance: 2 years or 24,000 miles
  • Average ten-year maintenance costs: $6,299 (CarEdge)

Toyota offers a pretty standard warranty package to back up their reputation for reliability. While the Grand Highlander is technically a newer model, it is essentially just a long wheelbase version of the regular Highlander, meaning its mechanical components have proven themselves to be dependable.

Your first two years or scheduled maintenance visits are free with your purchase of a Grand Highlander. After that point, maintenance is reasonably affordable. CarEdge estimates that the average SUV would cost you $1,867 more to maintain over ten years than the Grand Highlander.

A silver Lexus GX 460 parked on a street alongside a sidewalk in a city.


Forget Mercedes—this Lexus SUV is the smarter luxury buy

Mercedes may lead luxury, but this Lexus SUV delivers the same upscale feel with way less ownership stress.

There is plenty of space in all three rows of the Grand Highlander Hybrid

Its cabin is simple but exceptionally practical

While the cabins of Toyota’s vehicles are usually a little pedestrian, there is something to be said about how versatile they are, as well as how easy they are to live with. The Grand Highlander definitely follows this trend. While it lacks the flair that some of its rivals offer, it delivers three rows of spacious seating, tons of modern tech, and loads of storage space.

Interior dimensions and comfort

Front row headroom

41.5 inches

Front row legroom

41.7 inches

Second row headroom

40.2 inches

Second row legroom

39.5 inches

Third row headroom

37.2 inches

Third row legroom

33.5 inches

Cargo capacity (behind third row)

20.6 cubic feet

The ‘Grand’ in Grand Highlander refers to the fact that it is quite a bit bigger than the traditional Highlander, with much more room on the inside. While the third row is still best suited for the kids, you could definitely fit a pair of adults back there at a push. We’re also really impressed with how much cargo space there is behind the third row.

The cabin layout of the Grand Highlander is very neat. Everything is easy to find and there are a ton of storage compartments scattered throughout. Its design won’t blow you away, but you’ll be pleased with just how intuitive all the controls are. The most affordable trims focus on the essentials, but top trims can come with some pretty plush features, including genuine leather upholstery, heated and ventilated front seats, and captain’s chairs in the second row.

Amazon Basics Trunk Organizer

Material

Oxford

Organizer Dimensions

21″L x 14.6″W x 10.3″H

Special Feature

Foldable

This 13.5-gallon trunk organizer features compartments to organize and store groceries, sports equipment, emergency supplies, and other daily essentials.


Infotainment and technology

Every Grand Highlander comes equipped with a 12.3-inch infotainment screen mounted to the top of the dashboard. Lower trim levels come with a hybrid gauge cluster that includes a seven-inch display in the middle, but from the Limited up you get a fully digital 12.3-inch unit instead.

As we already mentioned, there are a number of USB-C ports throughout the cabin, so that the whole family can charge their devices. A wireless charging pad is also included. Three-zone automatic climate control and wireless smartphone mirroring are standard on every trim level. Top trims also offer some better tech, including a heads-up display and an 11-speaker JBL sound system.

Hauling the family doesn’t have to mean spending a ton on gas

The Grand Highlander hybrid is impressively thrifty

Full view of a black 2025 Toyota Grand Highlander driving. Credit: Toyota

Toyota’s ideology of function over form definitely translates into how they tune the performance of their cars. The Grand Highlander Hybrid may not be the most interesting SUV from behind the wheel, but its fuel-sipping powertrain and plush ride means that it will save you money in the long run and keep the family happy.

Grand Highlander Hybrid performance and efficiency

Model

Hybrid

Hybrid MAX

Engine

2.5-liter naturally aspirated inline-four

2.4-liter turbocharged inline-four

Transmission

CVT

6-speed automatic

Horsepower

245 HP

362 HP

Torque

288 LB-FT

400 LB-FT

Driveline

FWD or AWD

AWD

0-60 MPH

7.8 seconds

5.6 seconds

The Grand Highlander Hybrid comes in two different forms. Most models feature a naturally aspirated inline-four under the hood. The Platinum comes exclusively with the Hybrid MAX setup, though, with the Limited offering a choice of either. The standard hybrid powertrain better suits the Grand Highlander in our mind, with the Hybrid MAX’s quick acceleration clashing with the SUV’s laid-back personality, especially because it takes it toll when it comes to efficiency.

As is the case with a lot of Toyota’s mainstream models, the Grand Highlander lacks excitement, even accounting for the Hybrid MAX’s quick acceleration. Steering is exceptionally light and vague, and the suspension is clearly set up for comfort. This isn’t a bad thing in our eyes, though, as the mission of the Japanese SUV is to get your family from A to B. This is where its comfortable ride quality really shines through.

Fuel economy

Model

City

Highway

Combined

Hybrid FWD

37 MPG

34 MPG

36 MPG

Hybrid AWD

36 MPG

32 MPG

34 MPG

Hybrid MAX AWD

26 MPG

27 MPG

27 MPG


There are few SUVs as well-suited to family life

Toyota skips the flash and the gimmicks that a lot of other brands have leaned into in the last couple of years. They focus instead on proven technology and long-term dependability. If you’re buying a family vehicle, that should be high up on your list of priorities. Any parent will tell you that they’d take simple functionality over anything, which is what makes the Grand Highlander Hybrid such a solid choice in this segment.



Source link