Most Wear OS watch faces are ugly—these 6 actually look good


As much as I like Wear OS, I have to admit the platform has always had one weakness: watch faces. The Galaxy Watch and Pixel Watch have nice built-in options, but venture into the Play Store to look for more, and it’s not easy to find good ones. Allow me to make some suggestions.

For a long time, third-party Wear OS watch faces were genuinely not great, but it was for technical reasons. Back in 2023, Google released a format for designers that allowed third-party watch faces to behave like native faces. It became mandatory this year to use this more optimized format, so you can feel good about using third-party watch faces.

Digalog

The best of both worlds

My personal favorite watch face is called Digalog, and if you’re good with portmanteaus, you may have guessed what it does. I’ve always had a hard time choosing between analog and digital watch faces. Analog faces almost always look nicer, but I can’t pretend digital isn’t easier to read.

Digalog combines the analog and digital into a single watch face. At first glance, it looks like a normal analog watch with dashes and hands. However, at the end of the hour and minute hands are digital numbers labeling their position on the clock. If that isn’t cool enough, you also get three slots for complications.

Mono

Minimal in style, not information

The most recent watch face I’ve downloaded is called Mono. This one balances minimal style while offering a lot of customization choices. You can get a nice, dense spread of information without it feeling messy and crowded. You get 11 clock designs, 50+ colors, and four slots for complications.

Nothing Fancy

Highly informative

As alluded to with the previous watch face, it can be challenging to find designs that offer tons of information and still look good. Nothing Fancy does that better than most. You get a whopping eight slots for complications, multiple dial styles, and accent color choices. Don’t let the name fool you—this is a pretty fancy watch face.

Radii

A timeless classic Wear OS watch face

Wear OS originally launched as “Android Wear” way back in 2014. A year later, a watch face called Radii appeared in the Play Store. It’s been consistently updated ever since, and it’s still one of the nicest, minimal watch faces you can find. The hour is shown at the center, and it’s orbited by the minutes. Today’s date is show on the left, and battery life is represented with a strip along the right edge. You can choose the color, but not much else. And that’s okay.

Tidal Glow

Pixel Watch inspired

One of the most common watch face inspirations is Google’s Pixel Watch. Tidal Glow does this, too, but it does it better than many others. The “glow” part of the name comes from an ambient glow effect that matches the accent color of your choosing. In addition, it shows the date and has four complication slots—one being for more detail. It’s clean and informative, just like a Pixel Watch.

Typograph

Fun with fonts

I must admit I’m a sucker for a good font. If you’re a fellow typophile, you’ll appreciate the Typograph watch face. It offers 16 font styles and 400 color combinations to choose from. You can make it as plain or informative as you want with three optional complication slots. Empty slots allow for more of the big, bold fonts to shine. It’s a very eye-catching watch face.


Well-made watch faces aren’t free

As you may have noticed, most of the watch faces on this list are not free. That’s something I’ve come to accept with all the time I’ve spent searching the Play Store for not ugly watch faces. I don’t often pay for mobile apps, but if it’s something that lives on my wrist for all the world to see, I’m okay handing over a couple of dollars. Thankfully, you won’t find any subscriptions with these watch faces. Pay once and enjoy them forever.


Samsung Galaxy Watch 7 quick settings.


These are the 5 settings I change on every Galaxy Watch

My favorite thing about Samsung Galaxy Watches is the many options and customization features. It’s a stark contrast to the Pixel Watch. However, that does mean it takes a bit of effort to get everything working just right. Here’s where I start.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Whoop MG on arm

The Whoop is one of the devices that Google’s rumored screenless health tracker would compete with.

Nina Raemont/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways 

  • Google is poised to unveil a Whoop dupe soon. 
  • Steph Curry teased a screenless health band on his Instagram. 
  • Here’s what I’d like to see from a Google fitness band. 

Could Google’s latest fitness tracker return to its original, screenless Fitbit form? All signs say yes. Google has teased a screenless, Whoop-adjacent health tracker with the help of basketball star Steph Curry. A recent Instagram post from Curry shows him wearing a screenless, fabric band around his wrist, and the accompanying caption promotes “a new relationship with your health.” 

There are scant confirmed details on this next device, but rumors suggest the band will be called “Fitbit Air.” 

Also: I replaced my Whoop with a rival fitness band that has no monthly fees – and it’s nearly as good

Why a screenless fitness band? And why now? Google’s new device could be taking interest away from popular fitness brand Whoop. Whoop’s fitness band is on the more luxurious end of the health wearables spectrum. The company offers three subscription tiers, starting at $199, $239, and $359 annually. Google’s device, on the other hand, is rumored to be more affordable with the option to upgrade to Fitbit Premium. 

Google has the opportunity to make an accessibly priced fitness band with the rumored Fitbit Air and breathe new life into its older Fitbit product lineup, which hasn’t been updated in years. 

What I’m expecting 

Here’s what I expect to see and what I hope Google prioritizes in this new health tracker.

Given Fitbit’s bare-bones approach to fitness tracking, I assume Google will emphasize an affordable, accessible fitness band with the Fitbit Air. Most Fitbit products cost between $130 and $230, so I’m expecting this band to be on the lower end of that price range. I’d also expect Fitbit to give users a free trial of Fitbit Premium. 

Also: T-Mobile is practically giving away the Apple Watch Series 11 – here’s how to get one

A long, long, long battery life 

A smartwatch with a bright screen and integrations with an accompanying smartphone consumes a lot of power. That’s why some of the best smartwatches on the market have a middling battery life of one to two days, tops. 

A fitness band, on the other hand, is screenless. That makes the battery potential on this Fitbit Air double — or even triple — that of Google’s smartwatches.

Also: I use this 30-second routine to fix sluggish Samsung smartwatches – and it works every time

The Fitbit Inspire 3 has around 10 days of battery life — with a watch display. I hope the screenless Fitbit Air has at least 10 days of battery life, plus some change. Two weeks of battery life would be splendid. 

In addition to usage time, I also hope that a screenless fitness tracker addresses some of the issues Fitbit Inspire users have complained about. Many Inspire users report that the device’s screen died after a year of use. They could still access data through the app, but the screen was dysfunctional. Despite being a more affordable Google health tracker, the Fitbit Air should last users for a few years without any hardware issues — or at least I hope it does. 

Fitbit’s classically accurate heart rate measurements 

As Google’s Performance Advisor and the athlete teasing Google’s next device, Steph Curry is sending the message that this new device, one that offers wearers “a new relationship with your health,” will be built for athletes and exercise enthusiasts. I hope this device homes in on accurate heart rate measurements and advanced sensing, as other Fitbit devices do. 

Also: I walked 3,000 steps with my Apple Watch, Google Pixel, and Oura Ring – this tracker was most accurate

Like Whoop, I hope the insights the Fitbit Air provides are performance- and recovery-driven. Whoop grew in popularity for exactly this reason. Not only do Whoop users get their sleep and recovery score, but they also see, through graphs and health data illustrations, how their daily exercise exertion, strain, and sleep interact with and inform each other. 

I’m assuming that Fitbit Premium, with its AI-powered health coach and revamped app design, may do a lot of the heavy lifting for sleep and recovery insights with this new product. 

Also: Are AI health coach subscriptions a scam? My verdict after testing Fitbit’s for a month

But I also hope Google adds a few features on the app’s home screen that specifically target athletic strain and recovery, beyond the steps, sleep, readiness, and weekly exercise percentage already available on the Fitbit app’s main screen. 

Lots of customizable, distinct bands 

I hope the Fitbit Air is cheap — and the accompanying bands are even cheaper. If the rumors of affordability are true, then I’d hope Fitbit sells bands that can be worn with the device that match users’ styles and color preferences at a similarly affordable and accessible price point. Curry wears a gray-orange band in his teaser. I hope the colorways for this device are bold, patterned, and easily distinguishable from rival fitness bands. 





Source link