These 6 free, open-source apps saved me $852 last year


If you’ve started mentally tallying up your software subscriptions and wincing a little, you’re probably overdue for a cleanup. The good news is that the open-source ecosystem has quietly become really good—good enough that some apps outright beat their paid alternatives. Last year, I switched to these six free, open-source apps, and they saved me nearly a grand without forcing me to compromise.

HandBrake

The most surprising $120 I saved on hard disks

HandBrake is a free video transcoding tool that most people use to convert videos from one format to another or turn Blu-ray rips into something more manageable. Many people use it to replace paid video conversion software, which is already a solid way to save money. Personally, though, I use HandBrake to cut down on storage costs.

I travel frequently and shoot a lot of video footage. On average, each trip generates around 1TB of data, and last year alone I went on four trips. By the end of the year, I was sitting on nearly 4TB of raw footage.

Fortunately, HandBrake let me convert all that footage from H.264—the default codec used by most phones and cameras—to H.265 (HEVC), which is far more storage-efficient. After transcoding, the total size dropped by roughly 75%—meaning my 4TB of video shrank to around 1TB, which could fit comfortably within my existing storage setup.


The Tdarr interface in the Chrome web browser showing over 7TB of space savings.


Stop buying hard drives for Plex: How I reclaimed 7TB for free

Your Plex library is bloated—the automated tool that saved me 7TB

Without HandBrake, I would’ve needed to buy another hard drive just to store my videos. Considering that a decent 4TB HDD costs at least $120, it’s safe to say HandBrake saved me that money.

Handy and OpenWhispr

A clean way to ditch a $144 subscription

I’ve always hated typing, and to make matters worse, I now get severe wrist pain if I type for more than an hour. Because of that, I’ve relied on voice typing and transcription tools for years to help me get my thoughts down.

Years ago, I used Dragon NaturallySpeaking. Later, I switched to Otter, and more recently I have been using Wispr Flow. It was excellent, but it also cost me $15 a month. Fortunately, around the same time, more FOSS transcription tools started appearing.

The first one I tried was Handy. It’s clean, simple, and delivers excellent transcription quality while processing everything locally on your machine. Under the hood, it uses Nvidia’s Parakeet model, which is lightweight enough to run on your CPU, making it a great option for people without a dedicated GPU.

Eventually, though, I moved to OpenWhispr, which I think is one of the most powerful transcription tools currently available. At its core, it’s a push-to-talk dictation app—you press a hotkey, speak, release it, and the transcribed text appears wherever your cursor is, inside virtually any app on your system.

The real advantage, however, comes if you have a GPU. In that case, you can configure local LLMs to process your transcriptions by removing filler words, correcting grammar, adjusting formatting, and even changing tone.

OpenWhispr is one of those FOSS apps that also offers a freemium cloud service. The free tier includes everything I discussed here, plus five hours of meeting transcription. If you need higher limits, paid plans start at $8 per month, which is fairly generous. Personally, though, I stick with the local setup, and it’s been perfect for my workflow.


Illustration of voice recording being made through artificial intelligence, with a phone in the background displaying the transcription of the recording.


How I Use AI to Transcribe and Organize My Voice Notes

Never lose your random spontaneous thoughts again.

Upscayl

Helped me downgrade my subscription and save $360

I’m a moderately heavy Midjourney user. I generate images for marketing assets, which means I often need 4K output—regular 1080p images don’t hold up well when you need to crop, edit, or zoom in.

The problem is that generating 4K images in Midjourney burns through GPU hours much faster. On the $30 Standard plan, which includes 15 GPU hours per month, I kept running out before the month ended. That eventually forced me onto the $60 Pro plan, bringing my annual Midjourney cost up to $720.

Fortunately—or unfortunately, depending on how you look at it—I only stayed on the higher tier for two months before discovering Upscayl. It’s a free, open-source AI image upscaler that can enlarge images by 4x using local AI models.

Having a GPU speeds up the process significantly, but it also works on a CPU. It even supports batch processing, so you can point it at an entire folder, hit start, and let it run overnight. By morning, you’ll have a batch of upscaled images ready to go.

Now I generate everything at normal resolution using the $30 Midjourney plan, then run the outputs through Upscayl afterward. I’m still getting usable 4K-quality images, but my annual spending has effectively dropped from $720 to $360.

Super Productivity and Syncthing

Three subscriptions gone—$280 saved

Super Productivity is probably the most powerful and underrated FOSS app I’ve ever used. It essentially gives you an entire productivity suite in a single app. From task management to time tracking and planning, it covers almost everything you’d normally need multiple subscriptions for.

At its core, it’s a to-do list with surprisingly advanced task management features. You can create detailed tasks with subtasks, notes, attachments, and estimated completion times. It also tracks how long tasks actually take, which helps you better understand your productivity patterns over time.

By default, Super Productivity displays tasks in a simple list view, but you can switch to a Kanban board for planning or an Eisenhower Matrix for prioritization. There’s also a planner view and calendar integration to help you schedule your workload more effectively.

Beyond task management, the app includes a distraction-free focus mode and break reminders to help prevent burnout. My favorite feature, though, is the plugin system—specifically the voice reminder plugin. Once configured, it uses text-to-speech to read out a custom reminder whenever you’ve been idle for too long. I have a habit of drifting toward distractions mid-task, and this feature has genuinely helped pull me back into focus.


A laptop displaying the Super Productivity logo on the screen, surrounded by task lists, a target with an arrow, a rising arrow chart, a clock, and a checklist, all set against a blue background.


This free open-source app breaks procrastination loops

Most apps help you plan work—this one helps you finally start it.

The one major limitation is that Super Productivity stores everything locally by default. That means your tasks stay tied to the device they were created on unless you set up syncing manually.

That’s where Syncthing comes in. It’s another FOSS app that syncs files directly between your devices using peer-to-peer connections. By syncing Super Productivity’s data folder, I can keep my tasks updated across my PC and phone automatically without relying on a cloud subscription or third-party servers.

Together, Super Productivity and Syncthing replaced three separate paid tools for me: Todoist for task management, Toggl Track for time logging, and Trello for Kanban boards. Altogether, those subscriptions were costing me roughly $228 per year.


A Windows laptop with a cloud-shaped file drawer coming out of the screen.


This free, open-source tool solves my biggest problem with local-first apps

Syncthing fixes the biggest problem with local-first apps. Notes, passwords, and documents stay private without being trapped on one machine.


Here’s what the savings add up to

FOSS App

What It Replaced

Monthly Savings

Annual Savings

Handbrake

External HDD or cloud storage upgrade

$120

OpenWhispr

Whispr Flow subscription

$12/mo

$144

Upscayl

Midjourney Pro plan (vs. Standard)

$30/mo

$360

Super Productivity

Toggl Track (time tracking)

$9/mo

$108

Super Productivity

Todoist (task management)

$5/mo

$60

Super Productivity

Trello (Kanban boards)

$5/mo

$60

Total

$852

The honest truth is that I didn’t set out to save $852. I just got tired of paying for subscriptions and started looking for alternatives. What surprised me was how good those alternatives turned out to be—all without compromising on quality or convenience.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Whoop MG on arm

The Whoop is one of the devices that Google’s rumored screenless health tracker would compete with.

Nina Raemont/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways 

  • Google is poised to unveil a Whoop dupe soon. 
  • Steph Curry teased a screenless health band on his Instagram. 
  • Here’s what I’d like to see from a Google fitness band. 

Could Google’s latest fitness tracker return to its original, screenless Fitbit form? All signs say yes. Google has teased a screenless, Whoop-adjacent health tracker with the help of basketball star Steph Curry. A recent Instagram post from Curry shows him wearing a screenless, fabric band around his wrist, and the accompanying caption promotes “a new relationship with your health.” 

There are scant confirmed details on this next device, but rumors suggest the band will be called “Fitbit Air.” 

Also: I replaced my Whoop with a rival fitness band that has no monthly fees – and it’s nearly as good

Why a screenless fitness band? And why now? Google’s new device could be taking interest away from popular fitness brand Whoop. Whoop’s fitness band is on the more luxurious end of the health wearables spectrum. The company offers three subscription tiers, starting at $199, $239, and $359 annually. Google’s device, on the other hand, is rumored to be more affordable with the option to upgrade to Fitbit Premium. 

Google has the opportunity to make an accessibly priced fitness band with the rumored Fitbit Air and breathe new life into its older Fitbit product lineup, which hasn’t been updated in years. 

What I’m expecting 

Here’s what I expect to see and what I hope Google prioritizes in this new health tracker.

Given Fitbit’s bare-bones approach to fitness tracking, I assume Google will emphasize an affordable, accessible fitness band with the Fitbit Air. Most Fitbit products cost between $130 and $230, so I’m expecting this band to be on the lower end of that price range. I’d also expect Fitbit to give users a free trial of Fitbit Premium. 

Also: T-Mobile is practically giving away the Apple Watch Series 11 – here’s how to get one

A long, long, long battery life 

A smartwatch with a bright screen and integrations with an accompanying smartphone consumes a lot of power. That’s why some of the best smartwatches on the market have a middling battery life of one to two days, tops. 

A fitness band, on the other hand, is screenless. That makes the battery potential on this Fitbit Air double — or even triple — that of Google’s smartwatches.

Also: I use this 30-second routine to fix sluggish Samsung smartwatches – and it works every time

The Fitbit Inspire 3 has around 10 days of battery life — with a watch display. I hope the screenless Fitbit Air has at least 10 days of battery life, plus some change. Two weeks of battery life would be splendid. 

In addition to usage time, I also hope that a screenless fitness tracker addresses some of the issues Fitbit Inspire users have complained about. Many Inspire users report that the device’s screen died after a year of use. They could still access data through the app, but the screen was dysfunctional. Despite being a more affordable Google health tracker, the Fitbit Air should last users for a few years without any hardware issues — or at least I hope it does. 

Fitbit’s classically accurate heart rate measurements 

As Google’s Performance Advisor and the athlete teasing Google’s next device, Steph Curry is sending the message that this new device, one that offers wearers “a new relationship with your health,” will be built for athletes and exercise enthusiasts. I hope this device homes in on accurate heart rate measurements and advanced sensing, as other Fitbit devices do. 

Also: I walked 3,000 steps with my Apple Watch, Google Pixel, and Oura Ring – this tracker was most accurate

Like Whoop, I hope the insights the Fitbit Air provides are performance- and recovery-driven. Whoop grew in popularity for exactly this reason. Not only do Whoop users get their sleep and recovery score, but they also see, through graphs and health data illustrations, how their daily exercise exertion, strain, and sleep interact with and inform each other. 

I’m assuming that Fitbit Premium, with its AI-powered health coach and revamped app design, may do a lot of the heavy lifting for sleep and recovery insights with this new product. 

Also: Are AI health coach subscriptions a scam? My verdict after testing Fitbit’s for a month

But I also hope Google adds a few features on the app’s home screen that specifically target athletic strain and recovery, beyond the steps, sleep, readiness, and weekly exercise percentage already available on the Fitbit app’s main screen. 

Lots of customizable, distinct bands 

I hope the Fitbit Air is cheap — and the accompanying bands are even cheaper. If the rumors of affordability are true, then I’d hope Fitbit sells bands that can be worn with the device that match users’ styles and color preferences at a similarly affordable and accessible price point. Curry wears a gray-orange band in his teaser. I hope the colorways for this device are bold, patterned, and easily distinguishable from rival fitness bands. 





Source link