Tesla finally launched FSD in China. Its rivals have been selling self-driving cars there for years.


TL;DR

Tesla confirmed FSD availability in China after years of delays. Chinese rivals already hold Level 3 certifications and run robotaxis.

Tesla announced on Thursday that its Full Self-Driving (Supervised) system is now available in China, listing the country among 10 markets where the technology can be accessed. The announcement on X was short on details and marks the first time Tesla has confirmed FSD availability in the world’s largest EV market. It comes a week after Elon Musk joined a US business delegation for President Trump’s summit with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Beijing.

The timing raises questions the announcement does not answer. It is unclear whether mainstream Chinese consumers can already activate FSD or whether the post signals regulatory approval that has not yet been publicly confirmed. Tesla’s China website lists “intelligent assisted driving” for the Model 3 at a one-time fee of 64,000 yuan (approximately $9,400), with a Mandarin disclaimer noting that features would be updated “shortly.” China’s embassy did not respond to requests for comment on whether regulatory approval had been granted.

Despite its name, Tesla’s FSD (Supervised) still requires active driver supervision and is classified as a Level 2 system, meaning the driver must remain in control at all times. A fully autonomous, unsupervised version is being trialled only on a fleet of Tesla vehicles operating as part of the company’s robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. The gap between the marketing name and the technology’s actual capability has been a persistent source of regulatory and consumer confusion.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The delay has been considerable. Musk first touted plans to bring FSD to China in 2024. In July of that year, he said he expected regulatory approval before the end of 2024. In September 2024, he cited “pending regulatory approval.” As recently as April 2026, Tesla’s CFO Vaibhav Taneja said in the Q1 earnings call that the company was still awaiting approval. Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that Tesla had launched a concerted hiring effort for autonomous driving roles in China, including autopilot test engineers, suggesting the regulatory path had finally cleared.

While Tesla waited, Chinese competitors moved. China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology issued its first Level 3 autonomous driving certifications in December 2025, approving passenger cars from Changan Auto and BAIC Motor. Level 3 allows hands-off driving under defined conditions, a capability Tesla’s FSD (Supervised) does not offer. Xiaomi delivered more than 410,000 vehicles in 2025 with its own advanced driver-assistance systems. Xpeng has been selling vehicles with highway and urban autonomous navigation in China since 2023. Huawei’s ADS 3.0 system, licensed to multiple Chinese automakers, operates without high-definition maps in more than 400 cities.

Chinese robotaxi companies are even further ahead. Pony.ai and Baidu’s Apollo Go are operating commercial, fully driverless ride-hailing services in multiple Chinese cities. Apollo Go caused a mass outage in Wuhan in April when more than a hundred robotaxis stopped mid-traffic, but the incident underscored the scale of deployment rather than the absence of it. Tesla’s robotaxi service, by comparison, is limited to a geofenced area of Austin.

Tesla’s competitive position in China has been under sustained pressure. In April, Tesla China sold the fourth-highest number of EVs in the country, behind BYD, Geely, and Chery, according to China Passenger Car Association data. Xiaomi launched a $34,300 YU7 Standard Edition this week that undercuts the Model Y by $4,350 with 50 kilometres more range. The FSD launch is positioned to restore a competitive advantage, but the technology Tesla is now offering in China is two levels below what Chinese regulators have already certified for domestic manufacturers.

The strategic question is whether FSD (Supervised), a Level 2 system that requires constant driver attention, is a meaningful differentiator in a market where competitors already offer Level 3 autonomy, proprietary mapping systems, and LiDAR-equipped vehicles at lower price points. Tesla’s camera-only approach, which Musk has argued is superior because it mirrors how humans drive, has not yet achieved the regulatory recognition in China that competitors using sensor fusion have obtained.

Chinese automakers are now entering Canada and expanding across Europe, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia with autonomous driving capabilities that were developed during the years Tesla spent waiting for Chinese regulators. The FSD launch, whenever it fully materialises for mainstream Chinese consumers, arrives in a market that has moved on. Tesla’s self-driving story in China is no longer about being first. It is about whether being late still matters.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Robot mowers on a yard

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


The perfect robot mower for you is not nearly as fancy and feature-heavy as you may think. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: it’s not the lawn mower, it’s all about the yard. A robot mower may be a market leader with top-of-the-line specs and still not be a good fit for your yard.

Here’s the great news: There’s a perfect robot mower for almost any yard. As someone who’s tested numerous types of robot lawn mowers, I’ve learned that many of the specs that brands market as groundbreaking are simply not vital for most shoppers. A mostly flat, fenced-in 0.10-acre yard doesn’t need the power that a hilly, sectioned, unfenced one-acre yard does.

Also: I tested the Ferrari of robot mowers for a month – here’s my verdict

If you’re looking to choose the best mower for your home, be sure to check out ZDNET’s robot mower buying guide

Here’s what you don’t need to stress over when buying a robot mower

Eufy E15 Robot Mower

Maria Diaz/ZDNET
For yards with… Best robot mower type Examples
No fences A wired boundary is best, but a great GPS/RTK robot mower can stick to the map you make with it. Yardcare E400, Mammotion Luba 3
Fences A LiDAR robot mower that can be dropped to mow with little setup and learn its map as it navigates. Eufy E15, Ecovacs Goat A3000
A lot of trees A LiDAR or wired boundary mower, since trees can interfere with satellite signals. Husqvarna iQ series (optional wire, EPOS)
Unbordered garden beds A GPS/RTK robot mower that you can set up to avoid flower beds when mapping. Mammotion Luba 3, Husqvarna iQ Series
Bordered garden beds A LiDAR, GPS, or wired boundary robot mower works for these yards. If you choose a wired boundary, you may have to bury wire around the flower beds, unless the borders are tall enough for the mower to avoid. Mammotion Yuka, Navimow Series H
pets A LiDAR robot mower that can adjust its navigation in real-time in reaction to its surroundings. Mova LiDAX Ultra 2000, Segway Navimow i2
Hills and uneven terrain An AWD robot mower capable of handling steep slopes, regardless of the navigation type. Mammotion Luba 3, , Husqvarna iQ

1. Don’t focus on: ‘AI-powered’ or other marketing buzzwords

Segway Navimow X3 Series robot mower

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Artificial intelligence (AI) has surpassed the popularity of acid-wash jeans in the 80s and Baby G watches in the early 2000s. And tech companies — including robot lawn mower manufacturers — are capitalizing on its appeal.

Most of these “AI-powered” or “intelligent mowing” terms are vague, geared to grab shoppers’ attention with buzzwords. That doesn’t mean that the robots don’t use AI to navigate, however. 

The key is to find out how the robot uses AI to its benefit, and whether that will meet your AI expectations. 

Also: This robot mower took care of my lawn for months – and it’s currently $300 off

AI algorithms typically process data captured by the robot’s hardware to help it make quick decisions and adjustments. For example, a robot lawn mower may have a set of sensors and cameras to capture its surroundings. The robot’s processor then uses AI to convert that information into actionable data, so it knows whether to swerve to avoid an obstacle or slow down around a retaining wall.

Instead, look for: The navigation tech under (and on) the hood

Instead of AI and other buzzwords, you should focus on matching the robot lawn mower’s hardware and navigation system to your yard. This includes whether the robot uses RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) for positioning, and whether it features LiDAR, cameras, and sensors. 

Then look at real user reviews to assess how accurately the robot mower maps and how well it performs around various types of obstacles.

There’s no blanket rule for robot mowers, but most do well with the following guidelines.

2. Don’t focus on: Premium extras

Yardcare E400 robot lawn mower

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Skip the premium extras that don’t match your yard. You really don’t need the most advanced robot mower; you need the one that will best handle your lawn. 

Most US homeowners have mostly flat lawns, simple rectangular layouts, minimal obstacles, and small yards. Yet some of the most popular mowers advertise features that don’t match this, and you don’t want to spend an extra few hundred dollars on advanced features that won’t deliver a noticeable difference in your yard.

Instead, look for: Only as much as you need

Do you have a mostly flat lawn with no fences and need a robot that can navigate to several sections separated by paths? Then you can skip AWD models and commit to superior mapping and navigation features, like multi-zone intelligence.

Also: I let a modular yard care robot mow my lawn – here’s my verdict after a month

Similarly, if you have a yard with dense trees covering most of it, it’s safe to skip the RTK models and go for LiDAR or boundary wire options instead. 

3. Don’t focus on: Flashy app features

Mammotion Luba 2 robot mower path

The path lines created by the Mammotion Luba 2, as captured by our Bink Outdoor camera, is one flashy app feature I can’t quit.

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Any dependable robot lawn mower requires an equally reliable mobile app to let you use it effectively. However, manufacturers market many flashy app features that end up being unnecessary for many users. 

Don’t make app features the deciding factor unless it’s something you genuinely care about. Many users don’t rely on voice control to run their mowers and don’t mind using a separate app for their robot rather than integrating it into an existing home automation system.

Also: I let a smart planter maintain itself for 2 months – here’s the result

A robot lawn mower with mediocre navigation and cutting performance can still have a flashy app — all while leaving behind missed patches or taking longer to finish mowing.

Instead, look for: The features you’ll actually use

Most robot mower users keep them running on a schedule to get the lawn-cutting chore off their minds. The majority of the most popular models offer basic features beyond scheduling, such as remote start and stop, basic mapping, automatic rain delay, and theft protection. 

It’s easy to find robot lawn mowers with these features, but if you’re looking for anything beyond that, just be sure that the feature is worth it, especially if you’re paying extra for that model.

Also: I’ve tested robot mowers for years – here’s my expert advice for every yard type

An example of a flashy app feature that is completely unnecessary, but I love having? The Mammotion’s pattern cutting. I can select the cutting pattern I want on the Mammotion app, whether I want lines or checkered, but I can also have the robot cut in custom patterns, like letters and numbers. I don’t care for mowed letters in my yard, but I like that it always has that freshly mowed checkered patterned with no effort from me. 

4. Don’t focus on: Cutting system extras

Segway Navimow X3 Series robot mower

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

The cutting width and system specs are important, as they can determine whether a robot can cover a given area in a day. However, most robot mowers use similar multiple-blade mulching systems. 

Unlike traditional lawn mowers with large blades for aggressive cutting in a single pass, robot mowers typically feature a set of small blades that constantly spin. Because of this, robot mowers trim smaller amounts of grass with each pass than a traditional mower, but they also cut more frequently and leave behind smaller grass clippings that decompose naturally.

Also: I powered my 3,000-sq-ft home with an EcoFlow battery in a blackout – here’s how it kept my AC on

Because the robot mowers have a smaller, compounding cutting system, the real-world differences between the cutting systems from one brand to another are often smaller than you’d expect. Other issues, like poor navigation, will be glaringly obvious before small differences in blade design.

Instead, look for: Cutting width and yard size

The average US yard would benefit more from navigation quality, consistency, and connectivity than blade design. Instead, you should focus on matching the mower to your yard size.

The robot’s capacity is measured in how many acres it can cover in a day. Among other features, this is calculated based on your robot’s battery size and cutting width. Essentially, most users want a robot that can mow an entire yard in a day, so you can set it and forget it and always come home to a mowed yard. You get this by getting the appropriate robot for your yard size.





Source link