Ghostwriter Is Back, Using a Ukrainian Learning Platform as Bait to Hit Government Targets


Ghostwriter Is Back, Using a Ukrainian Learning Platform as Bait to Hit Government Targets

Pierluigi Paganini
May 23, 2026

Ghostwriter targeted Ukrainian government agencies with phishing emails delivering malware and Cobalt Strike payloads.

The Belarus-nexus APT group Ghostwriter (also tracked as UAC-0057 and UNC1151) has resurfaced with a new phishing campaign targeting Ukrainian government organizations. This time the lure is Prometheus, a legitimate Ukrainian online learning platform that many government employees actually use. Using something familiar and trusted as bait is a deliberate choice, and it works better than generic phishing for exactly that reason.

Ukraine’s Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-UA) flagged the activity this week, noting it has been running since spring 2026. The delivery mechanism is straightforward: phishing emails sent from already-compromised accounts — making the sender look legitimate — carrying PDF attachments. Inside the PDF is a link that, when clicked, downloads a ZIP archive containing a JavaScript file. Nothing groundbreaking technically, but effective when the email appears to come from a known contact.

“Typically, the email contains a PDF attachment with a link that, when clicked, leads to the download of a ZIP archive containing a JavaScript file.” reads the advisory by CERT-UA.”The mentioned JS file is classified as OYSTERFRESH , which provides display of a decoy document, entry into the operating system registry in an obfuscated and encoded form of the OYSTERBLUES software tool , as well as loading and launching the OYSTERSHUCK component , which acts as a decoder for the mentioned OYSTERBLUES. For decoding, string reversal, ROT13 transformation and URL decoding are sequentially used, in particular.”

That JavaScript file, named OYSTERFRESH, handles two things simultaneously: it shows the victim a decoy document, something plausible enough to avoid suspicion, while in the background it drops an obfuscated and encrypted payload called OYSTERBLUES into the Windows Registry, and downloads a separate component called OYSTERSHUCK whose job is to decode and launch OYSTERBLUES when the time comes.

OYSTERBLUES is the actual workhorse. Once running, it profiles the compromised system, grabbing computer name, username, OS version, last boot time, and a list of running processes, and ships everything to a command-and-control server via HTTP POST. It then waits for instructions, which arrive as JavaScript code executed on the fly using the eval() function. The final payload that follows this chain is assessed to be Cobalt Strike, the widely-abused post-exploitation framework that gives attackers persistent, flexible access to compromised systems.

CERT-UA offered a practical mitigation that is easy to overlook in the noise.

“Typically for UAC-0057 (UNC1151), the infrastructure is hidden behind Cloudflare, and a significant portion of the domain names used belong to the .icu TLD .” continues the report. “To reduce the likelihood of the described cyber threat being implemented, it is advisable to apply known basic approaches to reducing the attack surface, in particular, restricting the ability to run wscript.exe for regular user accounts.”

Blocking standard users from running wscript.exe cuts off one of the most common JavaScript execution paths these campaigns rely on, a small configuration change with meaningful defensive impact.

The threat actor Ghostwriter (aka UNC1151UAC-0057) is linked to the government of Belarus. In August 2020, security experts from FireEye uncovered a disinformation campaign aimed at discrediting NATO by spreading fake news content on compromised news websites. According to FireEye, the campaign tracked as GhostWriter, has been ongoing since at least March 2017 and is aligned with Russian security interests.

In February, SentinelLABS observed a new Ghostwriter campaign targeting Belarusian opposition activists and Ukrainian military and government entities with a new variant of PicassoLoader. The campaign has been active since late 2024, threat actors used weaponized Microsoft Excel documents as lures.

The researchers believe the campaign is still ongoing, SentinelLABS states that the attacks are an extension of the long-running Ghostwriter campaign.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Ghostwriter)







Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Whoop MG on arm

The Whoop is one of the devices that Google’s rumored screenless health tracker would compete with.

Nina Raemont/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways 

  • Google is poised to unveil a Whoop dupe soon. 
  • Steph Curry teased a screenless health band on his Instagram. 
  • Here’s what I’d like to see from a Google fitness band. 

Could Google’s latest fitness tracker return to its original, screenless Fitbit form? All signs say yes. Google has teased a screenless, Whoop-adjacent health tracker with the help of basketball star Steph Curry. A recent Instagram post from Curry shows him wearing a screenless, fabric band around his wrist, and the accompanying caption promotes “a new relationship with your health.” 

There are scant confirmed details on this next device, but rumors suggest the band will be called “Fitbit Air.” 

Also: I replaced my Whoop with a rival fitness band that has no monthly fees – and it’s nearly as good

Why a screenless fitness band? And why now? Google’s new device could be taking interest away from popular fitness brand Whoop. Whoop’s fitness band is on the more luxurious end of the health wearables spectrum. The company offers three subscription tiers, starting at $199, $239, and $359 annually. Google’s device, on the other hand, is rumored to be more affordable with the option to upgrade to Fitbit Premium. 

Google has the opportunity to make an accessibly priced fitness band with the rumored Fitbit Air and breathe new life into its older Fitbit product lineup, which hasn’t been updated in years. 

What I’m expecting 

Here’s what I expect to see and what I hope Google prioritizes in this new health tracker.

Given Fitbit’s bare-bones approach to fitness tracking, I assume Google will emphasize an affordable, accessible fitness band with the Fitbit Air. Most Fitbit products cost between $130 and $230, so I’m expecting this band to be on the lower end of that price range. I’d also expect Fitbit to give users a free trial of Fitbit Premium. 

Also: T-Mobile is practically giving away the Apple Watch Series 11 – here’s how to get one

A long, long, long battery life 

A smartwatch with a bright screen and integrations with an accompanying smartphone consumes a lot of power. That’s why some of the best smartwatches on the market have a middling battery life of one to two days, tops. 

A fitness band, on the other hand, is screenless. That makes the battery potential on this Fitbit Air double — or even triple — that of Google’s smartwatches.

Also: I use this 30-second routine to fix sluggish Samsung smartwatches – and it works every time

The Fitbit Inspire 3 has around 10 days of battery life — with a watch display. I hope the screenless Fitbit Air has at least 10 days of battery life, plus some change. Two weeks of battery life would be splendid. 

In addition to usage time, I also hope that a screenless fitness tracker addresses some of the issues Fitbit Inspire users have complained about. Many Inspire users report that the device’s screen died after a year of use. They could still access data through the app, but the screen was dysfunctional. Despite being a more affordable Google health tracker, the Fitbit Air should last users for a few years without any hardware issues — or at least I hope it does. 

Fitbit’s classically accurate heart rate measurements 

As Google’s Performance Advisor and the athlete teasing Google’s next device, Steph Curry is sending the message that this new device, one that offers wearers “a new relationship with your health,” will be built for athletes and exercise enthusiasts. I hope this device homes in on accurate heart rate measurements and advanced sensing, as other Fitbit devices do. 

Also: I walked 3,000 steps with my Apple Watch, Google Pixel, and Oura Ring – this tracker was most accurate

Like Whoop, I hope the insights the Fitbit Air provides are performance- and recovery-driven. Whoop grew in popularity for exactly this reason. Not only do Whoop users get their sleep and recovery score, but they also see, through graphs and health data illustrations, how their daily exercise exertion, strain, and sleep interact with and inform each other. 

I’m assuming that Fitbit Premium, with its AI-powered health coach and revamped app design, may do a lot of the heavy lifting for sleep and recovery insights with this new product. 

Also: Are AI health coach subscriptions a scam? My verdict after testing Fitbit’s for a month

But I also hope Google adds a few features on the app’s home screen that specifically target athletic strain and recovery, beyond the steps, sleep, readiness, and weekly exercise percentage already available on the Fitbit app’s main screen. 

Lots of customizable, distinct bands 

I hope the Fitbit Air is cheap — and the accompanying bands are even cheaper. If the rumors of affordability are true, then I’d hope Fitbit sells bands that can be worn with the device that match users’ styles and color preferences at a similarly affordable and accessible price point. Curry wears a gray-orange band in his teaser. I hope the colorways for this device are bold, patterned, and easily distinguishable from rival fitness bands. 





Source link