App Store Review blocked $2.2B in attempted fraud in 2025


The App Store is seeing more submissions all the time. Malicious app submissions are also increasing in number.

Artificial intelligence has helped Apple’s human-based App Store Review process prevent over $2.2 billion in fraudulent transactions in 2025. It also rejected more harmful apps than ever before.

Policing the App Store for malware is a task for the App Store Review team, which is getting tougher over time thanks to AI-assisted app development. However, artificial intelligence is also helping Apple combat harmful versions of apps.

In a review of the 2025 submissions, Apple claims it had prevented over $2.2 billion in potentially fraudulent transactions. This brings the total over the last six years to more than $11.2 billion.

It also managed to reject over 2 million app submissions that could’ve been malicious and harmful to iPhone and Mac users.

The Trust and Safety Teams also stopped multiple large-scale attempts to create fraudulent accounts. Approximately 1.1 billion fraudulent customer account creations were detected and blocked, while 40.4 million customer accounts were deactivated over fraud and abuse.

Approximately 193,000 developer accounts were also deactivated in 2025 over fraud concerns. Another 138,000 developer enrollments were rejected.

Apple’s security effort also extends beyond the App Store. It detected and blocked 28,000 illegitimate apps from pirate storefronts in 2025. This included not only pirated versions of legitimate App Store apps, but also gambling apps, adult content, and malware.

An AI assist

The continued growth of app submissions meant Apple had to develop its AI tools to cope. While human reviewers have worked with machine learning tools to handle the task, Apple has continued to invest more to improve those tools.

The AI elements are used to flag complex malicious patterns, analyze similar apps, and to determine potential issues in app updates.

This includes tactics such as apps that were approved but then modified post-review to facilitate financial fraud. Almost 59,000 apps were removed for bait-and-switch actions like that.

Over 22,000 submissions were also rejected for having hidden and undocumented features, 443,000 were rejected for privacy violations, and over 371,000 for copying other apps.

Another 2.5 million submissions were blocked from TestFlight for fraud and security issues.

Success with an asterisk

While Apple’s latest claims are an improvement of those it made one year ago covering 2024, they are figures that obviously don’t cover the downfalls of the review process.

Apple’s report is all about stuff it has blocked, but it’s still vulnerable to things slipping through the process.

This includes the multitude of apps that somehow make it through examination but still perform harmful acts. In April, a fake cryptowallet got through, stinging consumers for about $9.5 million before being caught.

2026 has also been the year when AI ‘nudify’ apps became a problem. Millions of people downloaded the apps available in the App Store, and some even managed to advertise themselves in the App Store search.

Apple should be celebrated for defeating a lot of the malware and fraud-related apps, preventing them from getting into the App Store in the first place. However, as always, there’s still more work to be done.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Whoop MG on arm

The Whoop is one of the devices that Google’s rumored screenless health tracker would compete with.

Nina Raemont/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways 

  • Google is poised to unveil a Whoop dupe soon. 
  • Steph Curry teased a screenless health band on his Instagram. 
  • Here’s what I’d like to see from a Google fitness band. 

Could Google’s latest fitness tracker return to its original, screenless Fitbit form? All signs say yes. Google has teased a screenless, Whoop-adjacent health tracker with the help of basketball star Steph Curry. A recent Instagram post from Curry shows him wearing a screenless, fabric band around his wrist, and the accompanying caption promotes “a new relationship with your health.” 

There are scant confirmed details on this next device, but rumors suggest the band will be called “Fitbit Air.” 

Also: I replaced my Whoop with a rival fitness band that has no monthly fees – and it’s nearly as good

Why a screenless fitness band? And why now? Google’s new device could be taking interest away from popular fitness brand Whoop. Whoop’s fitness band is on the more luxurious end of the health wearables spectrum. The company offers three subscription tiers, starting at $199, $239, and $359 annually. Google’s device, on the other hand, is rumored to be more affordable with the option to upgrade to Fitbit Premium. 

Google has the opportunity to make an accessibly priced fitness band with the rumored Fitbit Air and breathe new life into its older Fitbit product lineup, which hasn’t been updated in years. 

What I’m expecting 

Here’s what I expect to see and what I hope Google prioritizes in this new health tracker.

Given Fitbit’s bare-bones approach to fitness tracking, I assume Google will emphasize an affordable, accessible fitness band with the Fitbit Air. Most Fitbit products cost between $130 and $230, so I’m expecting this band to be on the lower end of that price range. I’d also expect Fitbit to give users a free trial of Fitbit Premium. 

Also: T-Mobile is practically giving away the Apple Watch Series 11 – here’s how to get one

A long, long, long battery life 

A smartwatch with a bright screen and integrations with an accompanying smartphone consumes a lot of power. That’s why some of the best smartwatches on the market have a middling battery life of one to two days, tops. 

A fitness band, on the other hand, is screenless. That makes the battery potential on this Fitbit Air double — or even triple — that of Google’s smartwatches.

Also: I use this 30-second routine to fix sluggish Samsung smartwatches – and it works every time

The Fitbit Inspire 3 has around 10 days of battery life — with a watch display. I hope the screenless Fitbit Air has at least 10 days of battery life, plus some change. Two weeks of battery life would be splendid. 

In addition to usage time, I also hope that a screenless fitness tracker addresses some of the issues Fitbit Inspire users have complained about. Many Inspire users report that the device’s screen died after a year of use. They could still access data through the app, but the screen was dysfunctional. Despite being a more affordable Google health tracker, the Fitbit Air should last users for a few years without any hardware issues — or at least I hope it does. 

Fitbit’s classically accurate heart rate measurements 

As Google’s Performance Advisor and the athlete teasing Google’s next device, Steph Curry is sending the message that this new device, one that offers wearers “a new relationship with your health,” will be built for athletes and exercise enthusiasts. I hope this device homes in on accurate heart rate measurements and advanced sensing, as other Fitbit devices do. 

Also: I walked 3,000 steps with my Apple Watch, Google Pixel, and Oura Ring – this tracker was most accurate

Like Whoop, I hope the insights the Fitbit Air provides are performance- and recovery-driven. Whoop grew in popularity for exactly this reason. Not only do Whoop users get their sleep and recovery score, but they also see, through graphs and health data illustrations, how their daily exercise exertion, strain, and sleep interact with and inform each other. 

I’m assuming that Fitbit Premium, with its AI-powered health coach and revamped app design, may do a lot of the heavy lifting for sleep and recovery insights with this new product. 

Also: Are AI health coach subscriptions a scam? My verdict after testing Fitbit’s for a month

But I also hope Google adds a few features on the app’s home screen that specifically target athletic strain and recovery, beyond the steps, sleep, readiness, and weekly exercise percentage already available on the Fitbit app’s main screen. 

Lots of customizable, distinct bands 

I hope the Fitbit Air is cheap — and the accompanying bands are even cheaper. If the rumors of affordability are true, then I’d hope Fitbit sells bands that can be worn with the device that match users’ styles and color preferences at a similarly affordable and accessible price point. Curry wears a gray-orange band in his teaser. I hope the colorways for this device are bold, patterned, and easily distinguishable from rival fitness bands. 





Source link