Google Antigravity 2.0 launches with CLI, SDK, and AI agents


TL;DR

Google announced Antigravity 2.0 at I/O 2026, upgrading its agentic coding tool into a full developer platform with a revamped desktop app, a new CLI built in Go, and an SDK for custom agents. The update also introduces a $100/month AI Ultra plan and retires Gemini CLI for consumer users.

Google just made its most aggressive move yet in the rapidly evolving agentic coding market. At I/O 2026 on Monday, the company unveiled Antigravity 2.0, transforming what started as a Cursor competitor into a sprawling developer platform complete with an updated desktop app, a new command-line tool, and an SDK for building custom agents.

The original Antigravity launched in November 2025 alongside Gemini 3 as a free, agent-first IDE. Version 2.0 is a different beast entirely. The centrepiece is the revamped desktop application, which puts multi-agent orchestration front and centre. Developers can now set several agents to work on problems simultaneously, design custom subagent workflows, and schedule tasks that run automatically in the background.

The integrations go deep. Antigravity 2.0 connects natively with Google AI Studio, Firebase, and Android, letting developers export projects from AI Studio directly to their local Antigravity instance while carrying over full context. For those who prefer working in the terminal, Google is shipping a brand-new Antigravity CLI built in Go, which the company says is faster and more responsive than its predecessor.

That predecessor, Gemini CLI, is being shown the door. Google confirmed that consumer access to Gemini CLI and Gemini Code Assist IDE extensions will cease on 18 June 2026 for AI Pro, AI Ultra, and free-tier users. Enterprise customers on Gemini Code Assist Standard or Enterprise licences will retain access, but the message is clear: Antigravity is the future.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Rounding out the platform is the Antigravity SDK, which gives developers the building blocks to create custom agents on top of Google’s coding infrastructure. Google Cloud customers can connect directly to Antigravity, and custom agent templates are available in AI Studio for enterprise use cases. The company says it has already used Antigravity internally to build consumer features, including custom UI generation in Google Search.

Powering all of this is the new Gemini 3.5 Flash model, which Google claims outperforms Gemini 3.1 Pro on coding and agentic benchmarks while running four times faster than competing frontier models. In a neat bit of self-reference, Google says Gemini 3.5 Flash was itself co-developed using Antigravity. The desktop app also gains native voice command support, letting developers talk to their agents rather than type.

On pricing, Google is introducing a new AI Ultra tier at $100 per month, which offers five times the usage limits of the AI Pro plan. The existing top-tier AI Ultra subscription drops from $250 to $200 per month, delivering 20 times the Pro limits. The $100 price point puts Google in direct competition with OpenAI’s recently launched ChatGPT Pro tier and Anthropic’s Claude Max, both of which also charge $100 per month for enhanced access to coding tools. The premium tier at $200 matches Anthropic’s top Claude Max plan.

The timing is no accident. The agentic coding tools market is booming, and every major AI lab is scrambling for developer loyalty. GitHub recently paused new Copilot sign-ups as agentic workloads reshaped the economics of AI-assisted development, and GitLab has begun restructuring for what it calls the “agentic era.” With Antigravity 2.0, Google is betting that the future of coding belongs to whoever can orchestrate the most agents, the fastest, across the most surfaces.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Whoop MG on arm

The Whoop is one of the devices that Google’s rumored screenless health tracker would compete with.

Nina Raemont/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways 

  • Google is poised to unveil a Whoop dupe soon. 
  • Steph Curry teased a screenless health band on his Instagram. 
  • Here’s what I’d like to see from a Google fitness band. 

Could Google’s latest fitness tracker return to its original, screenless Fitbit form? All signs say yes. Google has teased a screenless, Whoop-adjacent health tracker with the help of basketball star Steph Curry. A recent Instagram post from Curry shows him wearing a screenless, fabric band around his wrist, and the accompanying caption promotes “a new relationship with your health.” 

There are scant confirmed details on this next device, but rumors suggest the band will be called “Fitbit Air.” 

Also: I replaced my Whoop with a rival fitness band that has no monthly fees – and it’s nearly as good

Why a screenless fitness band? And why now? Google’s new device could be taking interest away from popular fitness brand Whoop. Whoop’s fitness band is on the more luxurious end of the health wearables spectrum. The company offers three subscription tiers, starting at $199, $239, and $359 annually. Google’s device, on the other hand, is rumored to be more affordable with the option to upgrade to Fitbit Premium. 

Google has the opportunity to make an accessibly priced fitness band with the rumored Fitbit Air and breathe new life into its older Fitbit product lineup, which hasn’t been updated in years. 

What I’m expecting 

Here’s what I expect to see and what I hope Google prioritizes in this new health tracker.

Given Fitbit’s bare-bones approach to fitness tracking, I assume Google will emphasize an affordable, accessible fitness band with the Fitbit Air. Most Fitbit products cost between $130 and $230, so I’m expecting this band to be on the lower end of that price range. I’d also expect Fitbit to give users a free trial of Fitbit Premium. 

Also: T-Mobile is practically giving away the Apple Watch Series 11 – here’s how to get one

A long, long, long battery life 

A smartwatch with a bright screen and integrations with an accompanying smartphone consumes a lot of power. That’s why some of the best smartwatches on the market have a middling battery life of one to two days, tops. 

A fitness band, on the other hand, is screenless. That makes the battery potential on this Fitbit Air double — or even triple — that of Google’s smartwatches.

Also: I use this 30-second routine to fix sluggish Samsung smartwatches – and it works every time

The Fitbit Inspire 3 has around 10 days of battery life — with a watch display. I hope the screenless Fitbit Air has at least 10 days of battery life, plus some change. Two weeks of battery life would be splendid. 

In addition to usage time, I also hope that a screenless fitness tracker addresses some of the issues Fitbit Inspire users have complained about. Many Inspire users report that the device’s screen died after a year of use. They could still access data through the app, but the screen was dysfunctional. Despite being a more affordable Google health tracker, the Fitbit Air should last users for a few years without any hardware issues — or at least I hope it does. 

Fitbit’s classically accurate heart rate measurements 

As Google’s Performance Advisor and the athlete teasing Google’s next device, Steph Curry is sending the message that this new device, one that offers wearers “a new relationship with your health,” will be built for athletes and exercise enthusiasts. I hope this device homes in on accurate heart rate measurements and advanced sensing, as other Fitbit devices do. 

Also: I walked 3,000 steps with my Apple Watch, Google Pixel, and Oura Ring – this tracker was most accurate

Like Whoop, I hope the insights the Fitbit Air provides are performance- and recovery-driven. Whoop grew in popularity for exactly this reason. Not only do Whoop users get their sleep and recovery score, but they also see, through graphs and health data illustrations, how their daily exercise exertion, strain, and sleep interact with and inform each other. 

I’m assuming that Fitbit Premium, with its AI-powered health coach and revamped app design, may do a lot of the heavy lifting for sleep and recovery insights with this new product. 

Also: Are AI health coach subscriptions a scam? My verdict after testing Fitbit’s for a month

But I also hope Google adds a few features on the app’s home screen that specifically target athletic strain and recovery, beyond the steps, sleep, readiness, and weekly exercise percentage already available on the Fitbit app’s main screen. 

Lots of customizable, distinct bands 

I hope the Fitbit Air is cheap — and the accompanying bands are even cheaper. If the rumors of affordability are true, then I’d hope Fitbit sells bands that can be worn with the device that match users’ styles and color preferences at a similarly affordable and accessible price point. Curry wears a gray-orange band in his teaser. I hope the colorways for this device are bold, patterned, and easily distinguishable from rival fitness bands. 





Source link