I tested Sony’s new premium headphones, and they define practical luxury for me


100xcoll-1.jpg

pros and cons

Pros

  • Comfortable
  • Detailed sound
  • Stylish and practical
Cons

  • Expensive
  • Weak battery life

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


To commemorate a decade of acclaimed flagship over-ear headphones, Sony released a special-edition version, aptly named 1000X The Collexion. Sony looks back from 2016 to now, and its 1000X-series headphones went from proving they could outdo competitors to becoming industry frontrunners.

Also: I’ve tested dozens of Sony headphones – these 4 tweaks get me the best sound quality

Typically, Apple’s $549 price tag for its AirPods Max 2 is where I consider the ceiling for consumer headphones. Anything beyond, such as Bowers & Wilkins’ $800 Px8 S2, I put in the luxury category.

Sony just entered said category, pricing its 1000X The Collexion at $650, in exchange for its design and audio upgrades, which build on the WH-1000XM6, released one year ago. Thus, 1000X The Collexion shares a similar silhouette to its more affordable sibling, but debuts with a sleeker appearance, more premium materials, and higher-quality internal audio components.

Best headphone deals of the week

Deals are selected by the CNET Group commerce team, and may be unrelated to this article.

Improvements under the hood

Sony markets 1000X The Collexion as a deluxe version of the WH-1000XM6, but it offers internal improvements that set the special-edition headphones apart from the standard model. 

Also: Sony WH-1000XM6 vs. Bowers & Wilkins Px8 S2: How I’d justify spending $300 more for headphones

1000X The Collexion features a unidirectional carbon driver, opposed to the XM6’s standard carbon driver. This speaker design should reduce dome flexion, therefore reducing distortion. 1000X The Collexion still features Sony’s signature sound profile: warm, detailed, and colorful. However, I noticed that 1000X The Collexion’s sound profile is more lively than the XM6’s, with deeper and tighter low frequencies and less sharp high frequencies, all without any EQ tweaks.

BTS’s “Please” has a vibey bassline that’s clear and dense without any rumbling, and the harmonies of the group’s members are reproduced beautifully. Overall, 1000X The Collexion delivers a rich sound that avoids the fatigue the XM6 can cause with an overly analytical sound.

Sony XM6 vs 1000X The Collexion

Sony WH-1000XM6 (left) and Sony 1000X The Collexion (right).

Jada Jones/ZDNET

Sony upgraded 1000X The Collexion to include a new processor, powered by the V3 chip to run DSEE Ultimate, the company’s most advanced audio-quality upscaling algorithm, trumping DSEE Extreme. 

These headphones also debut with two more spatial audio modes for music and gaming. I usually prefer stereo when listening to headphones, and though Sony’s current 360 Upmix spatial audio is its best, I’ll stick with stereo.

Sony’s spatial audio upmixing widens the soundstage and adds some height, but that’s about it. There’s little movement and little opportunity for immersion, and some songs can sound too robotic and digitized when the upmix software is enabled.

Also: I listened to Sony, Bose, and Apple’s flagship headphones – and this pair’s ahead of the pack

Still, 1000X The Collexion features the same QN3 noise-reduction processor as the XM6, though Sony admits the XM6’s noise-canceling abilities are more advanced than those of its upscale sibling. I agree, though 1000X The Collexion’s noise cancellation isn’t weak, rather on par with the Sonos Ace or WH-1000XM5.

A design that (finally) challenges competitors

Sony revamped its design language for 1000X The Collexion, incorporating polished and brushed metal accents on the headphones’ yokes, buttons, headband, and ports rather than the matte plastic found throughout the WH-1000XM6. Additionally, 1000X The Collexion features slimmer earcups, a wider headband, and thicker ear pads for enhanced comfort.

Also: Sony vs. Bose: My buying advice after listening to flagship headphones from both brands

According to Sony, the new design choices were made to make the headphones look and feel more luxurious. I can attest that the new design addresses two issues I had with the WH-1000XM6: comfort and style — both of which were lacking. A wider headband, plushier ear pads, and roomier earcups promote long-term comfort better than the standard 1000X-series headphones, while shiny accents from yokes to microphone houses echo the designs of Sony’s contemporaries.

A major issue I had with the WH-1000XM6 was that they were immediately uncomfortable. I felt the ear pads were too thin, the earcups slightly too small, and the clamping force too tight to wear for more than half an hour. 1000X The Collexion’s thicker ear pads, more relaxed fit, and deeper earcups mitigate these issues. I wore these headphones for hours while working at my desk, and I could easily keep them on for a few hours on a plane.

Sony, Apple, and Sonos flagship headphones

Metallic accents, slim earcups, and minimalist designs influence modern luxury consumer headphone design. From left to right: Sony 1000X The Collexion, Sonos Ace, Apple AirPods Max 2.

Jada Jones/ZDNET

Apple’s release of the AirPods Max in 2020 changed consumer expectations for headphone design, which had often been limited to strictly practical shapes with little eye-catching detail. Since then, consumer headphones have increasingly become a piece of fashionable outerwear, partly due to Apple’s introduction of a new mainstream design and partly to society’s acceptance of frequent headphone use.

Compared to its competitors from Bose, Apple, and even Sonos, who utilized brushed nickel, anodized aluminum, and stainless steel, Sony’s WH-1000XM6 opted for a uniform, utilitarian, wholly plastic design. This time, Sony reaches deep into its style bag without shelving its practicality bag, valuing chicness as much as function, even though the company usually does the opposite.

As companies’ headphone design choices become bolder and more fashionable, so do their carrying cases. There are many complaints to be made about the AirPods Max’s carrying “case,” but I admit that it’s interesting to imagine headphones’ headband as a handle. 

Sony 1000X The Collexion in Platinum

Sony’s 1000X The Collexion carrying case (center left) and AirPods Max 2 (bottom right).

Jada Jones/ZDNET

Sony innovated the carrying case for its latest flagship headphones, the WH-1000XM6, swapping the generations-old case shape and zipper for a more ergonomic design and a stylish magnet. This time, 1000X The Collexion’s case still functions as a case, but features a cutout below the headband, creating a handle. 

To Sony, design entails more than looks, but also encompasses functionality, and I appreciate that. I also like that even though the 1000X The Collexion doesn’t fold, the carrying case solves the portability issue caused by its inflexible hinges.

Also: Bose Lifestyle Ultra vs. Sonos Era 100: I compared both smart speakers, and this one wins

Sony’s choice to slim 1000X The Collexion’s earcups is also a welcome aesthetic choice and adds to the headphones’ elevated look, though it only shaves off 33g of weight from an already lightweight pair. Still, the slimmer earcups resemble those of the Sonos Ace or the Bowers & Wilkins Px8 S2, achieving a sleeker look.

ZDNET’s buying advice

Sony’s 1000X The Collexion marks 10 years of the company’s innovation and strong competition in a crowded market. These headphones feature design elements I wish Sony implemented in its standard 1000X-series headphones, such as metallic finishes and enhanced comfort, but Sony uses 1000X The Collexion as a demarcation between audiences. If you’re seeking practical and stylish headphones without the ecosystem barriers imposed by Apple and Sonos, 1000X The Collexion are a great choice.

However, if style isn’t a concern, the WH-1000XM6 are ideal for everyday wear, as they offer six more hours of battery life than the 1000X The Collexion and stronger noise-canceling.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


The Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid has quickly become the default choice for buyers looking to step into an affordable hybrid SUV. It’s practical, efficient, and backed by a reputation that makes it an easy recommendation. But when you look beyond the badge, it’s no longer the clear-cut value leader it appears to be.

One Korean rival from Kia quietly outperforms it where it matters most. It’s cheaper to buy, significantly more fuel-efficient, and offers a more refined and spacious experience, despite targeting the same budget-conscious buyers. Instead of just meeting expectations, it raises them for what an entry-level hybrid SUV should deliver.

That’s what makes this comparison so one-sided. When a vehicle costs less while doing more, using less fuel, offering more room, and feeling more polished, it stops being an alternative and starts looking like the obvious choice.

In order to give you the most up-to-date and accurate information possible, the data used to compile this article was sourced from various manufacturer websites, including the EPA.


2026 Toyota Crown Signia


This Toyota hybrid beats Acura, Genesis, and even Lexus where it matters most

The Toyota Crown Signia does more than keep up. In several categories, it sets the pace.

There aren’t many small hybrid SUVs, but the Kia Niro is the best

Easily the most budget-friendly crossover on the market

Hybrid crossovers are a really attractive proposition. You get the added practicality of an SUV and fuel efficiency that keeps your monthly fuel bills low. Perhaps the most obvious choice here, especially if you’re on a tight budget, is the Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid. However, if you’re looking for the best bang for your buck, and the most efficiency, then the Kia Niro remains king of the subcompact SUV segment.

2026 Kia Niro Hybrid trims and pricing

Models

Starting MSRP

LX

$27,390

EX

$30,190

SX

$33,390

SX Touring

$35,790

As we’ve already mentioned, the Corolla Cross Hybrid is kind of the benchmark for small hybrid SUVs, with its badge definitely helping make it so popular. The Toyota has a starting price of $29,395, meaning it is just over $2,000 more expensive than the Kia. Despite this, we think even the most affordable Niro Hybrid feels more refined, better equipped, and, to top it all off, its more efficient.

With the Niro being one of the most affordable crossovers on the market, you have a little wiggle room when it comes to trims. We still wouldn’t climb the ladder far, as we think the EX offers the best bang for your buck. It comes with niceties like a smartphone charging pad, faux-leather upholstery, and an upgraded infotainment screen. The Premium package is also definitely worth the extra $2,000, adding things like a panoramic sunroof, a power-operated tailgate, and a premium sound system.


Front 3/4 shot of a red 2024 Mazda MX-5 Miata RF driving on a winding road with the ocean in the background.


These 5 sporty cars keep smiles high and fuel bills low

Fun behind the wheel doesn’t have to mean pain at the pump.

Neither are particularly entertaining, but the Niro is lighter on fuel

Beating Toyota at the hybrid game isn’t easy

Toyota is one of the most experienced automakers out there when it comes to building hybrid powertrains, with the Japanese brand being a big proponent of the setup. This is why it’s so impressive that the little Niro comes out ahead when it comes to efficiency. On top of this, Kia has delivered a more refined driving experience that feels better than you’d expect considering the price you pay.

Kia Niro Hybrid performance and efficiency


980919-1.jpg

kia-logo.jpeg

Base Trim Engine

1.6L I4 Hybrid

Base Trim Transmission

6-speed auto-shift manual

Base Trim Drivetrain

Front-Wheel Drive

Base Trim Horsepower

103.5 HP @5700 RPM

Base Trim Torque

106.3 lb.-ft. @ 4000 RPM

Base Trim Fuel Economy (city/highway/combined)

53/54/53 MPG

Base Trim Battery Type

Lithium polymer (LiPo)

Make

Kia

Model

Niro



The Corolla Cross Hybrid has a little more grunt than the Kia, putting down 196 horsepower versus the Niro’s dinky 139 horses. The 1.6-liter engine in the Korean crossover is an underachiever, which is why it takes around 8.9 seconds to get up to 60 miles per hour. With both of these crossovers being more urban crawlers than highway cruisers, we don’t think that lack of power is the end of the world.

There really isn’t a winner when it comes to driving engagement here, with both small SUVs being exceptionally dull to drive. However, the Kia Niro does come feature a pretty plush ride quality. It also gets a six-speed DCT instead of the CVT in the Corolla, which results in less droning when accelerating, resulting in a more refined experience.

Fuel economy

Model

City

Highway

Combined

Kia Niro FE

53 MPG

54 MPG

53 MPG

Kia Niro

53 MPG

45 MPG

49 MPG

Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid

46 MPG

39 MPG

42 MPG

Efficiency is a massive reason to pick a Kia Niro over a Corolla Cross Hybrid. The base model Niro is rated for up to 53 miles per gallon combined, with every other model managing 49 miles per gallon combined. This means that even the least efficient Niro is rated to get seven more miles per gallon than a Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid.


2027 Hyundai IONIQ 9 AWD Performance Calligraphy Black Ink


This Hyundai SUV takes three-row EV luxury into new territory

Hyundai IONIQ 9 AWD Performance Calligraphy Black Ink reveal

Kia delivers a sleek and stylish interior in the 2026 Niro

Meanwhile, the Corolla Cross is a bit boring

Toyota has always been known to value simplicity, and this has often resulted in somewhat underwhelming interiors. While there isn’t anything wrong with the cabin of the Corolla Cross, and it does come well-equipped, it does lean a little too far in the utilitarian direction. The Niro, on the other hand, finds a good middle ground between simplicity and modernity.

Interior dimensions and comfort

Model

Kia Niro Hybrid

Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid

Front row headroom

40.5 inches

38.6 inches

Front row legroom

41.5 inches

42.9 inches

Second row headroom

39.6 inches

39 inches

Second row legroom

39.8 inches

32 inches

Cargo capacity (behind second row)

22.8 cubic feet

21.5 cubic feet

Both the Niro and the Corolla Cross feel very practical for cheap subcompact SUVs, but the Kia has a pretty clear advantage. The Niro offers a much more spacious rear row of seats, with tons of legroom. You’d have no problem fitting even particularly tall passengers in the rear seats. It also does have a slightly more spacious cargo hold, though the difference here is much smaller.

Both the Corolla Cross and Niro have similar philosophies regarding interior design, but with some differences in execution. Both aim for basic functionality, but the Kia does it in a much more contemporary way. It’s obvious at all times that both crossovers are budget-oriented, in no small part thanks to the cheap plastics used, but build quality is good. The Kia also offers a few upscale touches that put it ahead of its Japanese rival, especially on higher trim levels.

Infotainment and technology

There is very little competition between the Niro and Corolla Cross when it comes to tech features. Both come standard with an eight-inch infotainment screen to start, with a 10.3-inch screen available on every trim but the base Niro and a 10.5-inch screen being optional in the Corolla Cross.

The two budget crossovers are fairly evenly matched when it comes to other tech features. Things like smartphone mirroring and a wireless smartphone charging pad are available on the Kia and Toyota. One key difference is the optional sound systems, with the Niro’s seven-speaker Harman/Kardon sound system performing much better than the optional JBL system in the Corolla Cross.


Cheaper, more efficient, and more refined

When comparing these two small crossovers side-by-side, it’s really hard to make a case for the Toyota. The Corolla Cross does have more power and comes with the peace of mind you get from the Toyota badge, but in just about every other way the Kia feels like the better deal. For less money, you’re getting a crossover that is more spacious, less boring on the inside, and far more efficient. In just about every way, the Niro is a more successful budget hybrid crossover.



Source link