Anthropic commits $200M with Gates Foundation to deploy AI in global health, education, and agriculture


TL;DR

Anthropic and the Gates Foundation have committed $200 million over four years to fund AI programmes in global health, life sciences, education, and economic mobility. The partnership will use Claude to accelerate vaccine research for neglected diseases, build literacy tools for sub-Saharan Africa and India, and release public benchmarks and datasets. It is four times the size of OpenAI’s $50 million Gates Foundation deal announced at Davos in January.

 

Anthropic has committed $200 million over four years to a partnership with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the largest deal of its kind between an AI company and a global philanthropy. The money, a mix of grant funding, Claude usage credits, and technical support, will fund programmes in global health, life sciences, education, and economic mobility, with partners in the United States and developing countries. Anthropic’s contribution takes the form of engineering staff time and API credits; the Gates Foundation provides grant funding, programme design, and field expertise.

The partnership is the most substantial indication yet that Anthropic, which is approaching a $900 billion valuation, intends to build a meaningful non-commercial operation alongside its enterprise business. The company’s Beneficial Deployments team, which leads the work, already offers nonprofits and educational institutions discounted access to Claude. But the Gates Foundation deal represents a step change in scale: it dwarfs the $50 million partnership that OpenAI struck with the same foundation at Davos in January to deploy AI in African healthcare clinics.

Global health: the centrepiece

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The largest share of the $200 million will go toward improving health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries, where roughly 4.6 billion people lack access to essential health services, according to the World Health Organisation. The programmes span three broad areas: accelerating drug and vaccine development, helping governments use health data for faster decision-making, and supporting frontline health workers.

On the research side, scientists will use Claude to screen potential vaccine and drug candidates computationally before moving into pre-clinical development, a process that could shorten early-stage timelines for diseases that pharmaceutical companies have little commercial incentive to pursue. The initial focus is on polio, HPV, and eclampsia and preeclampsia. HPV alone causes roughly 350,000 deaths annually, according to the WHO, with 90% occurring in low- and middle-income countries.

Anthropic will also work with the Institute for Disease Modelling, a research group within the Gates Foundation, to make epidemiological forecasts more accessible. The institute builds models that determine where and how treatments for malaria and tuberculosis are deployed; an integration with Claude aims to make those models usable by practitioners who are not modelling specialists. The broader ambition is to create public goods, connectors, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks — that allow any researcher or government to assess how AI systems perform on healthcare-related tasks.

Education and economic mobility

The partnership’s education component will fund AI-powered tutoring tools for K-12 students in the United States, alongside literacy and numeracy apps for children in sub-Saharan Africa and India. The latter effort is part of the Global AI for Learning Alliance, or GAILA, a coalition that Anthropic and the Gates Foundation are building with other partners. The first public goods from this work, model benchmarks, datasets, and knowledge graphs designed to ensure AI tutoring tools are effective, are expected later this year.

A notable element of the education programme is a commitment to improve how AI models handle African languages. AI systems have performed poorly at writing and translating dozens of languages spoken across the continent, and Anthropic and the foundation intend to support better data collection and labelling that will be released publicly to benefit the broader AI industry, not just Claude.

The economic mobility programmes are more varied. In agriculture, Anthropic will make crop-specific improvements to Claude and release datasets of local crops and evaluation benchmarks as public goods, targeting the roughly two billion people whose livelihoods depend on smallholder farming. In the United States, the partnership will develop portable records of skills and certifications, career guidance tools for new workforce entrants, and systems that link training programme data to employment outcomes.

What the deal says about Anthropic

The partnership sits at an interesting intersection of Anthropic’s commercial and public-interest ambitions. The company has spent the past year building a $1.5 billion joint venture with Wall Streetacquiring a biotech startup for $400 million, and committing $100 million to a partner network dominated by major consulting firms. The Gates Foundation deal is, in financial terms, smaller than any of those. But it is the most visible commitment Anthropic has made to the argument that AI should serve people who cannot afford enterprise software licences.

Whether the programmes deliver measurable impact will depend on execution in environments where infrastructure, connectivity, and institutional capacity are far more constrained than in Anthropic’s core markets. The Gates Foundation’s field expertise is the asset that makes the partnership plausible, it has decades of experience deploying health and education interventions in the countries where this work will happen. Anthropic’s contribution is the technology and the engineering hours to adapt it.

The commitment to releasing benchmarks, datasets, and evaluation tools as public goods is perhaps the most structurally significant element. If those resources are genuinely open, they could improve the performance of every AI system applied to global health and education, not just Claude. That would make the partnership’s value larger than the sum of its parts, a rare outcome in a technology industry that tends to treat philanthropy as a branding exercise.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


iPhone 17 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Prakhar Khanna and Jason Hiner/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


It’s been several months since Samsung launched its Galaxy S26 series of phones, so now that the dust has settled, I’m reevaluating them against the industry’s best. That starts with the flagship Galaxy S26 Ultra

Between it and the best iPhone available, the iPhone 17 Pro Max, you might be wondering which one is the better investment. The easy answer is, “Stick with whichever OS you have now,” but in all honesty, both phones are good enough to justify a switch. If you’re going to go, go big! It doesn’t get much bigger than these two powerhouses, so let’s dive in and see which one is the winner.

Also: Google Pixel vs. Samsung Galaxy: I’ve tested both brands extensively, and there’s a clear winner

As it happens, I carry the iPhone 17 Pro Max, and also the latest Android phone, and it doesn’t get much more “latest” than the S26 Ultra, so these opinions are based on prior experience with the S25 Ultra, a good amount of hands-on review time with the S26 Ultra, and the specs we have on hand. 


You should buy the iPhone 17 Pro Max if…

iPhone 17 Pro Max in Cosmic Orange

Jason Hiner/ZDNET

1. You (or your family) are in the Apple ecosystem

Platform lock-in is a thing, and Apple has it better than most. Apple provides an entire ecosystem of devices and cross-device functionality that most other OEMs can’t match. It’s not that Samsung doesn’t have an ecosystem of its own, but Apple’s devices are designed from the ground up to work together. They’re on a level of detail that other ecosystems — including Samsung’s — can’t really compete with.

Also: I tested the iPhone Air for a week, and here’s why 17 Pro Max users shouldn’t sleep on it

Then, there’s the 800-pound gorilla in the room. If your family is also in the Apple ecosystem, there’s even more reason to stay there. One of the reasons I carry an iPhone everywhere is that my kids also have iPhones. “Dad, can you ring my phone?” is a common refrain in my house. Add iMessage and parental controls to that, and there are enough roadblocks to make not carrying an iPhone a pretty big headache.

There are software workarounds for just about everything an iPhone can do with other devices, but they’re just that — workarounds. If you want to be embedded in the Apple ecosystem, there is only one phone category you can carry.

2. You want a phone that just works

It’s a cliché, but it exists for a reason. Apple has a long history of being late to the party with a lot of features, but typically, when they get the feature, it’s very polished. Apple doesn’t take half-steps, and it rarely (though not never) treats its users like beta testers. It will take in the landscape, identify a feature that people like, and make it significantly better than the competition.

Also: I’ve tried every iPhone 17 model, and my golden rule for upgrading is changing in 2025

That philosophy extends to apps built for the platform as well. Apple maintains high standards for its App Store and approval process. I routinely encounter the same app on both platforms: it works flawlessly the first time on an iPhone but struggles on an Android phone. There’s a lot that goes into app development, especially on a platform like Android that can have multiple versions and flavors, so there’s no shade. Apple just delivers a better and more consistent experience.

3. You’re a video shooter

There are multiple reasons why the iPhone 17 Pro Max is the phone to use for video. First and foremost, it is storage. Put simply, the iPhone can get up to 2TB of onboard storage; the S26 Ultra maxes out at 1TB. A terabyte of storage seems like a lot — and it is, but if you’re shooting a ton of 8K or even 4K video, that’s going to chew up your storage in a hurry. This is also a solid argument if you’re a hardcore gamer, as they take up a lot of space these days.

Also: I’ve got one big reason to recommend a year-over-year upgrade to Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max

The iPhone also offers a really great video experience. From shooting in dedicated ProRes Raw mode to open gate shooting, if you’re a filmmaker, you want options, and the iPhone gives you a ton. There are also numerous apps in the App Store that you can use to capture, enhance, and edit your videos. 

Sure, there are apps in the Play Store for Android, but this combination of tools built for filmmakers makes the iPhone 17 Pro Max the phone to get for video enthusiasts.

You should buy the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra if…

Prakhar Khanna holding the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra.

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

1. You want the raw power

As recently as two years ago, this heading would have belonged under the iPhone category. But after Qualcomm rolled out the Snapdragon 8 Elite processor for the Galaxy, things changed. Of course, we’re talking about raw numbers here — user experience and vertical integration go a long way on Apple’s side, but Qualcomm’s processors have started to outperform Apple’s on benchmarking apps, and that’s a big deal.

Also: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. Galaxy S25 Ultra: I’ve tried both flagships, and here’s my choice

Processing power is important in the realm of video processing/editing, gaming, and AI. If those are important categories for you, Samsung is the best game in town. The iPhone is a powerful machine, make no mistake, but the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is currently the most powerful phone you can buy at the moment. 

2. You’re all-in on AI 

Samsung Galaxy S26

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Unfortunately, Apple Intelligence has seen a few false starts now. Meanwhile, Samsung and Google keep rolling out AI-powered features one after another. This generation of Samsung phones is no exception, with Galaxy AI taking most of the headlines from this lineup of S26 smartphones. From editing images to the new Now Nudge feature, AI is all over this software release.

One particularly intriguing new feature is Gemini’s ability to summon an Uber with a command. Just tell Gemini where you want to go, and it’ll launch Uber, input the destination, and once you confirm, it’ll summon the car. This is the first of potentially numerous apps and services that can be further automated with AI. 

3. You value your privacy

Apple has always prided itself as a privacy-first company, and that’s fair enough. But Samsung is upping the ante with Privacy Screen, a hardware/software combination that could potentially change how people think about their phones and privacy. Samsung redesigned its screen to feature wide and narrow-angle pixels that the company can, through software, turn off individually to obscure the screen.

Also: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. S24 Ultra: I compared both models, here’s who should upgrade

It doesn’t just block looky-loos in the airplane seat next to you from reading your texts, but because it’s software-driven, you can selectively block specific elements on your screen. So your whole screen is bright and beautiful, but a notification rolls in and only blocks the area where it appears. 

Writer’s choice

Both of these phones are downright fantastic — there’s no question. But at the end of the day, if I had to pick, I’d go with the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. I have a dual-wielding phone lifestyle, but while I value the iPhone 17 Pro Max for its consistency and its comfort, Samsung and Android in general have a wider variety of fun form factors to play with, and that includes a multitude of accessories that you can buy into.

Apple works great within its ecosystem, and it’s just OK with everyone else. Android works very well with just about everything from Windows PCs to a wide variety of smartwatches and Bluetooth accessories. For everything an iPhone can connect to, an Android phone can connect to more. Plus, I didn’t even talk about the stylus here, because while I’m not a huge stylus person, I’m definitely a believer in the “it’s better to have it and not need it” philosophy.

Of course, as I mentioned before, I carry both. But I’m ultimately on Team Android, where I feel there’s more freedom. 

Specifications

iPhone 17 Pro Max

Samsung Galaxy S26

Display

6.9 AMOLED with 120Hz, 3000 nits peak

6.9″ QHD AMOLED 120Hz, TBD nits peak

Weight

233g

214g

Processor

Apple A19 Pro

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy

Storage

256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB

256GB, 512GB, 1TB

Battery

5,088mAh, 25W wired charging and 25W wireless charging

5,000mAh, 60W wired charging and 25W wireless charging

Camera

48MP wide / 48MP Ultra Wide / 48MP telephoto (4xx) / 18MP front

200MP wide / 50MP telephoto (5x) / 10MP telephoto (3x) / 50 MP ultrawide / 12MP front

Price

Starting at $1,199

Starting at $1,299





Source link