Bill Ackman moves into Microsoft, with the size to be disclosed today



Pershing Square has taken a new position in Microsoft, with the size to be disclosed in a 13F filing later on Friday. The stock is down roughly 16% year-to-date.

Bill Ackman has bought Microsoft. Pershing Square’s chief executive said on X on Friday morning that the fund had taken a new position in the software company after its recent share-price decline, with the size to be disclosed in a regulatory filing later in the day. 

Ackman’s stated rationale was that the market is mispricing the enterprise franchise rather than the AI one. Investors have underestimated Microsoft’s software ‘given its deeply embedded role across enterprises and highly attractive price-value proposition’, he wrote, framing the position as a quality-compounder bet on the installed base rather than a directional call on Azure capex.

The timing is the substance of the trade. Microsoft shares are down roughly 16% year-to-date and have traded near $413 since late April, when chief financial officer Amy Hood used the company’s fiscal Q3 results to raise full-year capital expenditure guidance to about $190bn, well above the roughly $155bn analysts had penciled in.

The results themselves were a beat. Azure grew 40%, the AI run-rate hit $37bn, and total revenue cleared $82.9bn. The stock fell anyway, on what one widely circulated buy-side note called the $190bn capex plan that repriced AI.

Ackman has run this play before this year. Pershing Square disclosed a new stake in Meta in February, three weeks after the latter’s own capex-driven sell-off, with Ackman describing the position at the time as a ‘deeply discounted valuation’.

The Microsoft entry follows the same shape: a megacap dragged lower by an AI-spending guide, framed by Ackman as an opportunity to buy a high-quality franchise at a temporarily de-rated multiple.

Funds running more than $100m are required to file Form 13F disclosures of US-listed positions within 45 days of quarter-end, which makes Friday a heavy day for hedge-fund reading.

Pershing Square’s last 13F, covering the December quarter, showed eleven positions and roughly $16bn in disclosed US holdings concentrated in Brookfield, Uber, Amazon, Alphabet and Meta. Microsoft did not appear. Today’s filing will show whether the firm has trimmed any existing names to fund the new one or sized it from cash.

The trade also lands inside a wider AI-infrastructure debate. Hyperscalers have committed more than $650bn to AI capex across 2026, on the combined Q1 numbers from Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Apple, and the market is now pricing the question of when, or whether, that spend converts cleanly into operating earnings.

Ackman is, in effect, arguing that Microsoft’s existing Office, Windows and Azure book of business is enough to clear the bar, separately from the AI optionality.

Microsoft’s deep integration of OpenAI’s models across Copilot, Azure and the developer stack has been the dominant narrative in the company’s repricing over the past three years (TNW has tracked the arc). The capex bill is the cost of holding that lead. Ackman’s bet is that the enterprise software business underneath it is being given less credit than it should.

Pershing Square has not disclosed the size of the position or the average purchase price. The 13F filing is expected later on Friday US time.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Modern displays are amazing when it comes to detail, brightness, color, and all the ingredients that make for an impressive picture—except motion clarity.

CRT screens are still the king of motion clarity, but plasma flat-panel screens hold a respectable second place, and in many ways I still miss my old 720p 51-inch plasma TV and the crisp motion I gave up by switching to a 4K LCD.

Plasma solved motion the “right” way

Plasma displays didn’t just show an image—they flashed it.

While they operate on different principles, CRTs and plasma TVs have a few things in common. First, the phosphors used by CRTs and plasma displays are the same. Second, because these phosphors fade quickly, they need to be continuously refreshed.

In a CRT, the electron beam scanning from the top to the bottom of the screen achieves this, and in a plasma, a high-speed electric pulse does the same. Because of this rapid pulse-and-fade, these screen technologies have crisp perceptual motion, since our brains tend to interpret moving images that don’t pulse as “smearing” across our retinas.

The pulsing nature of plasma technology isn’t the only reason for its better motion reproduction. These screens also have very low latency and very fast pixel response times. Combined, it’s not quite as good as CRT motion handling, but it’s significantly better than LCD and OLED technology, even today.

Modern TVs rely on sample-and-hold—and that’s the problem

Stand and deliver blurry images

Blur Busters UFO Test

Modern LCD and OLED televisions are “sample and hold” technologies. They can hold each frame of video perfectly for the entire duration of that frame without deviating in brightness and then instantly snap to the next frame without any dipping to black in-between.

On paper, this sounds like a good thing, but your eyes don’t stay still when tracking motion. As they follow a moving object, the image being held on screen effectively drags across your retina, creating the perception of blur. Even if the panel itself is perfectly sharp.

You might not even realize how blurry motion is on modern displays if all you’ve ever seen with the naked eye is an LCD or plasma. However, if you see a CRT or plasma in person, the difference is quite striking.

The sample and hold issue means that no matter how much you increase the refresh rate, that type of blur persists. It’s why my 85Hz CRT monitor is clearly less blurry in motion than my 240Hz LCD monitor. It’s especially apparent when you’re playing 2D games that scroll the entire screen, with LCDs or OLEDs smearing the image in a way that gives me a bit of a headache if I’m being honest.

Playing Diablo 2 on a CRT. Credit: Sydney Louw Butler/Shutterstock.com

It creates this weird situation where a modern TV can be incredibly sharp in a freeze frame but somehow look softer than a lower-resolution display that isn’t sample and hold as soon as you press play.

Motion interpolation is a workaround, not a solution

It’s an abomination, that’s what it is

One of the “fixes” that TV makers came up with to reduce unwanted motion blur is a technology known as frame interpolation, or more commonly “motion smoothing.” Here an algorithm creates fake frames that guess at what the middle step of motion would look like if it were captured. This creates a high frame-rate video output, which we see as smoother and more crisp.

While this doesn’t take away sample-and-hold blur, it does improve motion clarity. Unfortunately, it also destroys the intended frame rate that shows and movies were meant to be seen at. It’s also useless for video games, because it introduces an enormous amount of input lag. NVIDIA’s DLSS technology is also frame interpolation, but it works for games because of several mitigations NVIDIA put into the technology. These measures don’t exist on TVs.

While some people think motion smoothing isn’t all bad, TV makers are no longer activating it by default as much anymore, and my advice is to always turn it off because the trade-offs are just not worth it.

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 9.21.03 AM

7/10

Brand

TCL

Display Size

85-inches

The 2025 model TCL QM6K Google TV delivers a stunningly clear and bright picture with a new Mini-LED panel, improved local dimming zones, Dolby Vision IQ, and a neat new Halo Control system for improved visuals. Get this TV and elevate your living room. 


Black frame insertion tries to recreate plasma—but comes with trade-offs

Who turned out the lights?

The other trick sample-and-hold screens have to mimic what CRTs and plasma TVs do naturally is called BFI, or Black Frame Insertion. As the name suggests, the display inserts a full black frame between every original frame. This provides an instant and dramatic increase in motion clarity. However, it also has a big impact on brightness. As much as half of the light is now gone, so the image is much dimmer. Pushing overall brightness to compensate makes things hotter and more energy-hungry.

Some BFI implementations cause visible flicker, for which I personally have no tolerance at all, but the biggest problem here is that BFI doesn’t have the smooth pulsing roll off of the phosphors used in CRTs and plasma.


The future might circle back—but we’re not there yet

That might be changing, however, because a new generation of LCDs can leverage the power of multi-zone backlight technology to strobe the backlight across the screen in a way that mimics a CRT scanline.

NVIDIA’s G-SYNC Pulsar has received rave reviews from the biggest motion blur haters, and I sincerely hope that a similar technology becomes standard in TVs going ahead, so we can go back to enjoying the crisp motion we used to have without all the compromises.



Source link