The Honor 600 Pro shows Samsung what an affordable flagship should look like


Samsung has had a comfortable run with its Fan Edition line. The formula has always been straightforward: take the flagship experience, trim a few corners, drop the price, and watch buyers line up. For years, it worked because nobody was doing it better. The Galaxy S25 FE is proof that Samsung still knows how to execute that formula. It’s also proof that the formula is no longer enough.

Enter the Honor 600 Pro. A phone that, on paper and in the hand, makes the Galaxy S25 FE look like Samsung stopped trying.

The chip gap

The Galaxy S25 FE runs on Samsung’s Exynos 2400 with 8GB of RAM. That is a capable processor, and in daily use, it holds its own. But Honor did not settle for capable. The Honor 600 Pro is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite, the same chip that powered 2025’s top Android flagships, paired with 12GB of RAM. The Snapdragon 8 Elite is, undoubtedly, the stronger performer of the two, with a measurable edge in CPU and GPU performance, along with better thermal efficiency under sustained load.

It’s worth noting that when the S25 FE launched in late 2025, the Snapdragon 8 Elite was powering full-blown flagships. So Samsung’s decision to go with its in-house Exynos chip wasn’t without reason. But with the Honor 600 Pro arriving just a few months later and still offering that chip at a comparable price, the gap becomes harder to ignore. Add the extra 4GB of RAM, and Honor pulls ahead.

The display Samsung should have offered

The Galaxy S25 FE offers a 6.7-inch FHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X display with a resolution of 1080x 2340 pixels, a 120Hz refresh rate, peak brightness of 1,900nits, and no DC dimming or PWM dimming. It’s a good screen. It’s not, however, a great one.

The Honor 600 Pro counters with a 6.57-inch AMOLED panel at 1264 x 2728 pixels, an eye-watering peak brightness of 8,000nits, and 3,840Hz PWM dimming. Sure, the 600 Pro’s screen is smaller, but it’s also sharper, brighter, and easier on the eyes during extended use, which earns Honor another win.

Cameras: ambition vs. adequacy

The Galaxy S25 FE features a 50MP main camera, a 12MP ultrawide, and an 8MP telephoto. The 8MP telephoto is the detail that stings the most. In a market where zoom capability has become a genuine differentiator, Samsung equipped its fan-focused phone with one of the weakest telephoto units in its class.

The Honor 600 Pro answers with a 200MP main sensor, a 12MP ultrawide, and a 50MP periscope zoom telephoto with 3.5x optical zoom. After having spent some time with the Honor’s camera system, the S25 FE’s setup feels lacklustre. Samsung’s ProVisual Engine and AI editing tools are genuinely well done, but software polish only goes so far when the underlying hardware is this outgunned.

The battery widens the gap

This is where Samsung’s cautious approach with the S25 FE becomes impossible to defend. The device packs a 4,900mAh battery with 45W wired charging and 15W wireless charging. In contrast, the Honor 600 Pro houses a massive 7,000mAh battery (6,400mAh on the European variant) with 80W wired, 50W wireless, and 27W reverse wired charging. That is not a marginal difference.

Honor made battery capacity a priority and built around it. Samsung, as it tends to do across its entire lineup, did not. For buyers who spend long days away from a charger, that gap will be difficult to overlook.

What makes the difference between the two even harder to swallow is the pricing. In the UK, the S25 FE costs £919 (~$1,240) for the 8GB/512GB model, while the Honor 600 Pro comes in at £899.99 (~$1,215) for the 12GB/512GB configuration. Honor offers more battery, faster charging, better camera hardware, a better display, and more RAM, all for less money.

Where Samsung still holds ground

To be fair to the S25 FE, it’s not a losing proposition across the board. Running Android 16 with Samsung’s One UI 8 on top, it brings a full range of Galaxy AI tools backed by one of the most trusted and long-supported Android software experiences in the industry.

One UI is familiar, deeply refined, and comfortable for the vast majority of Android users. Honor’s MagicOS, on the other hand, draws obvious comparisons to iOS in its layout and design language. Some users will appreciate the clean, Apple-inspired aesthetic, but others might find it jarring, particularly those coming from a long history with Android. It’s a capable platform, but it’s newer to global markets and carries less of the ecosystem depth that Samsung has built over time.

Samsung’s seven-year update commitment and impressive track record of delivering updates put it ahead of Honor’s six-year support window and less established presence in global markets when it comes to long-term ownership confidence.

On the design front, the S25 FE also has a case to make. At 161.3×76.6×7.4mm and weighing just 190g, it’s a slim, lightweight device that feels refined and easy to live with day to day. The Honor 600 Pro is marginally more compact at 156×74.7×7.8mm, but it’s thicker and weighs 200g (195g for the European variant), which might be noticeable over extended use.

The Honor 600 Pro also wears its iPhone 17 Pro influence openly, especially with its width-spanning camera island and camera arrangement. It’s a striking look, but buyers who prefer a more understated design may find the S25 FE the more comfortable choice.

Both phones carry an IP68 rating for dust and water resistance, but the Honor goes further with an additional IP69K certification, meaning it can withstand high-pressure water jets. For most users, that distinction will rarely matter, but it’s another area where Honor has simply done more.

The S25 FE is also widely available globally, including in the US, while the Honor 600 Pro is not. For a significant portion of global buyers, the Honor is simply not an option.

A wake-up call Samsung can’t ignore

The Galaxy S25 FE is not a bad phone. It’s a competent, well-made device that benefits from Samsung’s more mature software and broader ecosystem. But that’s no longer enough in a segment that is becoming increasingly competitive. The Honor 600 Pro has shown that a brand willing to push its affordable flagship without compromise can produce something that makes Samsung’s approach look timid by comparison.

The good news is that Samsung will likely get another shot at this soon. The Galaxy S26 FE is expected to land sometime around September this year, and if the S25 FE has taught Samsung anything, it should be that buyers in this segment deserve more than deliberate restraint. More battery, better silicon, and a stronger zoom camera are no longer unreasonable asks for a brand with Samsung’s resources. Early signs, however, are not particularly encouraging.

A leaked Geekbench listing suggests the Galaxy S26 FE will once again be powered by an in-house Exynos chip, this time the Exynos 2500. It’s a step forward from the Exynos 2400, but it still suggests Samsung is not ready to give its Fan Edition buyers the best silicon available. Whether that changes before launch remains to be seen. For now, the Honor 600 Pro has set a new benchmark for what an affordable flagship can be, and the pressure is firmly on Samsung to respond.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Modern displays are amazing when it comes to detail, brightness, color, and all the ingredients that make for an impressive picture—except motion clarity.

CRT screens are still the king of motion clarity, but plasma flat-panel screens hold a respectable second place, and in many ways I still miss my old 720p 51-inch plasma TV and the crisp motion I gave up by switching to a 4K LCD.

Plasma solved motion the “right” way

Plasma displays didn’t just show an image—they flashed it.

While they operate on different principles, CRTs and plasma TVs have a few things in common. First, the phosphors used by CRTs and plasma displays are the same. Second, because these phosphors fade quickly, they need to be continuously refreshed.

In a CRT, the electron beam scanning from the top to the bottom of the screen achieves this, and in a plasma, a high-speed electric pulse does the same. Because of this rapid pulse-and-fade, these screen technologies have crisp perceptual motion, since our brains tend to interpret moving images that don’t pulse as “smearing” across our retinas.

The pulsing nature of plasma technology isn’t the only reason for its better motion reproduction. These screens also have very low latency and very fast pixel response times. Combined, it’s not quite as good as CRT motion handling, but it’s significantly better than LCD and OLED technology, even today.

Modern TVs rely on sample-and-hold—and that’s the problem

Stand and deliver blurry images

Blur Busters UFO Test

Modern LCD and OLED televisions are “sample and hold” technologies. They can hold each frame of video perfectly for the entire duration of that frame without deviating in brightness and then instantly snap to the next frame without any dipping to black in-between.

On paper, this sounds like a good thing, but your eyes don’t stay still when tracking motion. As they follow a moving object, the image being held on screen effectively drags across your retina, creating the perception of blur. Even if the panel itself is perfectly sharp.

You might not even realize how blurry motion is on modern displays if all you’ve ever seen with the naked eye is an LCD or plasma. However, if you see a CRT or plasma in person, the difference is quite striking.

The sample and hold issue means that no matter how much you increase the refresh rate, that type of blur persists. It’s why my 85Hz CRT monitor is clearly less blurry in motion than my 240Hz LCD monitor. It’s especially apparent when you’re playing 2D games that scroll the entire screen, with LCDs or OLEDs smearing the image in a way that gives me a bit of a headache if I’m being honest.

Playing Diablo 2 on a CRT. Credit: Sydney Louw Butler/Shutterstock.com

It creates this weird situation where a modern TV can be incredibly sharp in a freeze frame but somehow look softer than a lower-resolution display that isn’t sample and hold as soon as you press play.

Motion interpolation is a workaround, not a solution

It’s an abomination, that’s what it is

One of the “fixes” that TV makers came up with to reduce unwanted motion blur is a technology known as frame interpolation, or more commonly “motion smoothing.” Here an algorithm creates fake frames that guess at what the middle step of motion would look like if it were captured. This creates a high frame-rate video output, which we see as smoother and more crisp.

While this doesn’t take away sample-and-hold blur, it does improve motion clarity. Unfortunately, it also destroys the intended frame rate that shows and movies were meant to be seen at. It’s also useless for video games, because it introduces an enormous amount of input lag. NVIDIA’s DLSS technology is also frame interpolation, but it works for games because of several mitigations NVIDIA put into the technology. These measures don’t exist on TVs.

While some people think motion smoothing isn’t all bad, TV makers are no longer activating it by default as much anymore, and my advice is to always turn it off because the trade-offs are just not worth it.

Screenshot 2025-07-01 at 9.21.03 AM

7/10

Brand

TCL

Display Size

85-inches

The 2025 model TCL QM6K Google TV delivers a stunningly clear and bright picture with a new Mini-LED panel, improved local dimming zones, Dolby Vision IQ, and a neat new Halo Control system for improved visuals. Get this TV and elevate your living room. 


Black frame insertion tries to recreate plasma—but comes with trade-offs

Who turned out the lights?

The other trick sample-and-hold screens have to mimic what CRTs and plasma TVs do naturally is called BFI, or Black Frame Insertion. As the name suggests, the display inserts a full black frame between every original frame. This provides an instant and dramatic increase in motion clarity. However, it also has a big impact on brightness. As much as half of the light is now gone, so the image is much dimmer. Pushing overall brightness to compensate makes things hotter and more energy-hungry.

Some BFI implementations cause visible flicker, for which I personally have no tolerance at all, but the biggest problem here is that BFI doesn’t have the smooth pulsing roll off of the phosphors used in CRTs and plasma.


The future might circle back—but we’re not there yet

That might be changing, however, because a new generation of LCDs can leverage the power of multi-zone backlight technology to strobe the backlight across the screen in a way that mimics a CRT scanline.

NVIDIA’s G-SYNC Pulsar has received rave reviews from the biggest motion blur haters, and I sincerely hope that a similar technology becomes standard in TVs going ahead, so we can go back to enjoying the crisp motion we used to have without all the compromises.



Source link