RCS hasn’t fixed the green bubble problem


In Messages on iPhone, you can now use SMS, RCS, end-to-end encrypted RCS, and iMessage. Sure, sending media to Android is better, but everything else is more confusing and frustrating than ever.

Sometimes a clever marketing trick or feature highlight can lead to deeply rooted societal divides. What started as a way to show users that they were not using iMessage and potentially being nickeled and dimed for each SMS is now, annoyingly, a kind of status symbol.

The simple act of texting has become a divisive and sometimes irritating aspect of using a smartphone. Whether you care about technology or not, if you’re an iPhone user, you’ve at the least subconsciously reacted to a green bubble text.

For the Android user, it’s a different story. When they text an iPhone user, most of the time it feels like texting anyone. Then there’s the double text, a “sent with balloons,” or “Wesley liked that text” that intrusively shoves itself into the chat.

There’s got to be a better way.

RCS is just another band-aid

RCS is the bastard child of internet protocol messaging that is still somehow tied to carriers. It is a dumb idea that climbed to the top of dumb ideas and won out as the most suitable dumb idea.

iPhone screen showing RCS Messaging settings with dark theme, where RCS Messaging, End-to-End Encryption Beta, and RCS Business Messages toggles are all switched on against a bright green background

RCS has been slowly accumulating new features

The concept: “Let’s replace the ancient SMS protocol controlled by carriers with a new one still controlled by carriers.”

Thankfully, the protocol is better. Some reactions actually show up as expected on the Android user’s chat, images are no longer potato quality, and you can actually send a 4K video.

The thing is, it only made things more complicated and frustrating for the end user, especially for those on iPhone.

Now, not only do you need to pay attention to what kind of message it is, green or blue, you have to know if it’s SMS or RCS. iOS 26.5 throws in another wrinkle — end-to-end encryption.

We’ve gone from two potential endpoints to four. Great work, team.

XKCD comic: 14 competing standards inspire two stick figures to create a universal standard; final panel humorously reveals the result as 15 competing standards instead.

Image source: XKCD comic ‘Standards’

Not only that, but this “beta” feature for E2EE seemingly breaks RCS chats for some users. This is likely out of Apple’s hands and more of a carrier/device issue.

When using RCS, you have to consider the device each person is using, the software version, the carriers in use, and whether or not end-to-end encryption has been enabled.

You don’t have that problem with iMessage. It just works.

It’s easy to blame Apple

There was once this idea that Apple could flip a switch and bring iMessage to Android whenever it felt like it. That they were greedily just keeping it exclusive for customer lock-in.

Hand holding a smartphone displaying a dark-mode chat conversation, including a shared photo of colorful spray bottles, against a softly lit, blurred indoor background with a tall light strip

iMessage continues to hold blue bubbles as superior

There’s some truth to the latter, but the former is definitely not accurate. Maybe iMessage was a much less complex service at the start, even with its end-to-end encryption.

But once the Secure Element and biometrics got involved, iMessage became more dependent on what hardware was involved in the conversation.

Perhaps Apple could bring iMessage to just select Android phones with things like Samsung Knox or Pixel’s version of the Secure Element. But that would create yet another complexity and annoyance layer for users to overcome.

Google spent years blaming Apple for the fracture in messaging protocols. However, if you examined the situation, it was the other way around.

Close-up of a blue iPhone 17 Pro Max back, showing three large camera lenses, a flash, and small sensor dots on a rectangular raised camera module.

Cross platform messaging with native applications shouldn’t be this complicated

If Google had bothered to implement similar systems in early Android, it would have had a competitive and dominant internet messaging protocol. Instead, it has an ecosystem where users can have three separate apps installed for SMS by default.

I don’t want a less secure iMessage that’s more open, nor do I want a carrier-controlled protocol that’s fractured and complicated. Apple had no interest in developing a separate protocol that could ultimately supersede iMessage, but Google obviously did.

But it never bothered. Google has its messaging app, sure, but it doesn’t compare in features or implementation to Apple’s.

It isn’t as if Google didn’t have the money and engineering talent to build a killer universal chat app. It just chose not to for whatever reason.

Look at Meta’s Facebook Messenger app. It’s annoyingly complicated and insecure, but it exists and is very popular.

All Google needed to do was come up with Android’s version of iMessage, but also include it on iPhone, and it could have dominated the market. But there’s no ad revenue or financial incentive to do so.

Sleek dark blue laptop half open in midair, showing edge of keyboard and glowing rainbow-colored light strip on the palm rest against a black background

Googlebook brings AI to your cursor

Look at Google’s recent Android event where it announced a bunch of AI tools no one asked for and a “Googlebook” that’s a tragic merging of ChromeOS and Android. Just shake your mouse, and AI will pop up! No thanks.

There’s another reason Google didn’t bother with a new cross-platform messaging app. It is likely the same reason Apple didn’t attempt it either – it’s not easy.

The Android ecosystem is just too fractured to build a secure software stack with expectations of minimum performance and security features across devices. There are just too many variables to account for in Android.

Where messaging stands today

I have a lot of group chats, and most of them are iMessage-based. A couple, more recently, have Android participants.

Phone messaging screen with purple aurora background, showing chat bubbles saying How Cuuuttteeee, Loved an image, and a green bubble reading Got lots of options for a future movie night

Add one Android user to a previous iMessage group chat and this is a lot of your experience

Having Android users as friends isn’t a bad thing. I want them to be included, but it has added some pain points.

Every few messages, it says “you’ve renamed this chat.” I’ve also encountered a bug that says my message can’t be sent.

It just fails and fails, and I just have to wait until it doesn’t. That was present in iOS 26.4 and will likely get worse with iOS 26.5.

Our group chat names and images stuck, so that’s nice. But if we use any reaction beyond the couple chosen by RCS, it shows up as “person reacted with emoji.”

Hand holding a light pink iPhone 17e showing its back camera and Apple logo, with a blurred garden of purple and white flowers in the background

iPhone 17e makes it easy to switch from Android, but price isn’t always the issue

We also can’t utilize some iMessage-specific features like polls.

RCS is many steps above SMS, absolutely. I’ve even turned off SMS fallback and MMS messaging to ensure I’m only using RCS.

I’m not personally invested in how these things work on Android devices. Those people bought those devices for whatever reason, and they can live with whatever the group chat looks like.

Of course, I’d love to see Google improve that aspect too, but it feels unlikely. They just don’t seem to care.

Fixing RCS on iPhone

Apple, on the other hand, should do some of its usual magic to improve interacting with Android users. It would satisfy their demand for feature exclusivity and lock-in too.

Close-up of a smartphone screen showing messaging options: Automatically Translate toggle enabled, buttons for Show in Contacts and Block Contact, and text noting the conversation is not encrypted, on bright green background

RCS is still being worked on so things could get better

Basically, what I want is Apple’s Messages app to intelligently manage any chat involving RCS or SMS. Place reactions appropriately and don’t show the “person reacted with emoji” message. Same goes for message effects, etc.

Polish off the rough edges and make the chat feel more natural. We already have an iPhone, so there’s no need to convince us by making the green bubbles a worse experience.

On a side note, Apple should bring more apps to Android so sharing Apple features isn’t so awkward. We have Shared Photo Albums in Photos for our group chats, but the Android users can’t participate.

Apple Invites on Android goes through a browser. Other links to Apple services are basically useless.

At least Android has Apple Music and Apple TV. But it should have Apple Podcasts, Apple Maps, and Apple Photos.

Blue iPhone 17 Pro Max with three rear cameras lying on textured wooden table outdoors, with blurred mechanical keyboard and another gadget in the background

Apple should make messaging all platforms good even if Google doesn’t

Imagine SharePlay with Android users via Apple apps. Apple could introduce those other apps as a way to give Android users a taste of what they might be missing on iPhone.

Apple has nothing to worry about. If anything, it might gain some paying customers.

Such a change might even help reduce the social problems like bullying for green bubbles. If the experience is less bad, but still not as good as iMessage, it’s a win-win.

I’m happy that RCS exists and it is moving towards universal end-to-end encryption. I just wish this whole thing wasn’t so finicky.

No one should ever think about what chat protocol they are using in 2026, yet Apple’s green/blue bubbles do exactly that. There should be a change.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


When you pick out a phone, you’re also picking out the operating system—that typically means Android or iOS. What if a phone didn’t follow those rules? What if it could run any OS you wanted? This is the story of the legendary HTC HD2.

Microsoft makes a mess with Windows Mobile

The HD2 arrives at an unfortunate time

windows mobile 6.5 Credit: Pocketnow

Officially, the HTC HD2 (HTC Leo) launched in November 2009 with Windows Mobile 6.5. Microsoft had already been working on Windows Phone for a few years at this point, and it was planned to be released in 2009. However, multiple delays forced Microsoft to release Windows Mobile 6.5 as a stopgap update to Windows Mobile 6.1.

Microsoft’s plan for mobile devices was a mess at this time. The HD2 didn’t launch in North America until March 2010—one month after Windows Phone 7 had been announced at Mobile World Congress. Originally, the HD2 was supposed to be upgraded to Windows Phone 7, but Microsoft later decided no Windows Mobile devices would get the new OS.

This left the HD2 stuck between a rock and a hard place. Launched as the final curtain was dropping on one OS, but too early to be upgraded to the next OS. Thankfully, HTC was not just any manufacturer, and the HD2 was not just any phone.

The HD2 was better than it had any right to be

HTC made a beast of a phone

HTC HD2 Credit: HTC

HTC was one of the best smartphone manufacturers of the late 2000s and 2010s. It manufactured the first Android phone, the first Google Pixel phone, and several of the most iconic smartphones of the last two decades. Much of the company’s reputation for premium, high-quality hardware stems from the HD2.

The HD2 was the first smartphone with a 4.3-inch touchscreen—considered huge at the time—and one of the first smartphones with a 1 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon processor. That processor, along with 512GB of RAM, made the HD2 more future-proof than HTC probably ever intended. Phones would be launching with those same specs for the next couple of years.

For all intents and purposes, the HD2 was the most powerful phone on the market. It just so happened to run the most limiting mobile OS of the time. If the software situation could be improved, there was clearly tons of potential.

The phone that could do it all

Android, Windows Phone, Ubuntu, and more

The key to the HD2’s hackability was HTC’s open design philosophy. It had an easily unlockable bootloader, and it could boot operating systems from the NAND flash and SD cards.

First, the community took to righting a wrong and bringing Windows Phone 7 to the HD2. This was thanks to a custom bootloader called “MAGLDR”—Windows Phone 7.5 and 8 would eventually get ported, too. The floodgates had opened, and Windows Phone was the least of what this beast of a phone could do.

Android on the HTC HD2? No problem. Name a version of the OS, and the HD2 had a port of it: 2.2 Froyo, 2.3 Gingerbread, 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, 4.1/2/3 Jelly Bean, 4.4 Kitkat, 5.0 Lollipop, 6.0 Marshmallow, 7.0 Nougat, and 8.1 Oreo. Yes, the HD2 was still getting ports seven years after it launched.

But why stop at Android? The HD2 was ripe for all sorts of Linux builds. Ubuntu—including Ubuntu Touch—, Debian, Firefox OS, and Nokia’s MeeGo were ported as well. The cool thing about the HD2 was that it could dual-boot OS’. You didn’t have to commit to just one system at a time. It was truly like having a PC in your pocket, and the tech community loved it.

Do a web search for “HTC HD2” now, and you’ll find many articles about the phone getting yet another port of an OS. It became a running joke that the HD2 would get new versions of Android before officially supported Android phones did. People called it “the phone that refuses to die,” but it was the community that kept it alive.

The last of its kind

“They don’t make ‘em like they used to”

HTC HD2 close up Credit: TechRepublic

The HTC HD2 was a phone from a very different time. It may have gotten more headlines, but there were plenty of other phones being heavily modded and unofficially upgraded back then. Unlockable bootloaders were much more common, and that created opportunities for enthusiasts.

I can attest to how different it was in the early years of the smartphone boom. My first smartphone was another HTC device, the DROID Eris from Verizon. I have fond memories of scouring the XDA-Developers forums for custom ROMs and installing the latest Kaos builds on a whim during college lectures. Sadly, it’s been many years since I attempted that level of customization.

It’s not all doom and gloom for modern smartphones, though. Long-term support has gotten considerably better than it was back in 2010. As mentioned, the HD2 never officially received Windows Phone 7, and it never got any other updates, either. My DROID Eris stopped getting updates a mere eight months after release.

Compare that to phones such as the Samsung Galaxy S26, Google Pixel 10, and iPhone 17, which will all be supported through 2032. You may not be able to dual-boot a completely different OS on these phones, but they won’t be dead in the water in less than a year. We will likely never see a phone like the HTC HD2 from a major manufacturer again.

HTC Droid Eris


A Love Letter to My First Smartphone, the HTC Droid Eris

No, not that DROID.



Source link