While Google is helping Apple upgrade its AI, the search giant may have taken a little too much liking to the Apple Intelligence name. A new leak shared by Mysticleaks on Telegram seems to show “Gemini Intelligence” inside Google’s software running on what looks like a Pixel smartphone.
For now, it is best to take the leak with a grain of salt until there is something more concrete. But if the video is accurate, Google could be preparing the feature for the Pixel 11 series, which is expected to launch around August 2026.
The irony is almost too rich. Apple Intelligence is Apple’s big bet on making Siri smarter, more personal, and actually useful in the AI age. And yet Apple has signed a multi-year partnership with Google to power next-gen Siri with Gemini models. So Google may simultaneously be fueling Apple Intelligence and launching Gemini Intelligence. That is either very efficient or very silly branding.
Google
Google has already started expanding Gemini’s Personal Intelligence features. These allow Gemini to connect with apps like Gmail, Google Photos, YouTube, and Search to answer questions with a user’s own context. Instead of asking a generic chatbot for help, users can ask for information tied to their emails, photos, saved details, and activity across Google services.
Why would Pixel 11 make sense?
Pixel phones have long been Google’s test bed for AI features, including call screening and AI-powered photo editing tools. If “Gemini Intelligence” is real, Pixel 11 would be the natural place to introduce it as a deeply integrated, phone-level AI layer. We just hope that the name gets a second pass. Assuming, of course, that there’s a name to pass on at all.
Vibe coding has taken the development world by storm—and it truly is a modern marvel to behold. The problem is, the vibe coding rush is going to leave a lot of apps broken in its wake once people move on to the next craze. At the end of the day, many of us are going to be left with apps that are broken with no fixes in sight.
A lot of vibe “coders” are really just prompt typers
And they’ve never touched a line of code
Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek
Vibe coding made development available to the masses like never before. You can simply take an AI tool, type a prompt into a text box, and out pops an app. It probably needs some refinement, but, typically, version one is still functional whenever you’re vibe coding.
The problem comes from “developers” who have never written a line of code. They’re just using vibe coding because it’s cool or they think they can make a quick buck, but they really have no knowledge of development—or any desire to learn proper development.
Think of those types of vibe coders as people who realize they can use a calculator and online tools to solve math problems for them, so they try to build a rocket. They might be able to make something work in some way, but they’ll never reach the moon, even though they think they can.
Anyone can vibe code a prototype
But you really need to know what you’re doing to build for the long haul
For those who don’t know what they’re doing, vibe coding is a fantastic way to build a prototype. I’ve vibe coded several projects so far, and out of everything I’ve done, I’ve realized one thing—vibe coding is only as good as the person behind the keyboard. I have spent more time debugging the fruits of my vibe coding than I have actually vibe coding.
Each project that I’ve built with vibe coding could have easily been “viable” within an hour or two, sometimes even less time than that. But, to make something of actual quality, it has always taken many, many hours.
Vibe coding is definitely faster than traditional coding if you’re a one-man team, but it’s not something that is fast by any means if you’re after a quality product. The same goes for continued updates.
I’ve spent the better part of three months building a weather app for iPhone. It’s a simple app, but it also has quite a lot of complex things going on in the background.
It recently got released in the App Store—no small feat at all. But, I still get a few crash reports a week, and I’m constantly squashing bugs and working on new features for the app. This is because I’m planning on supporting the app for a long time, not just the weekend I released it, and that takes a lot more work.
Vibe coders often jump from app to app without thinking of longevity
The app was a weekend project, after all
Credit: Lucas Gouveia/How-To Geek | ViDI Studio/Shutterstock
I’ve seen it far too often, a vibe coder touting that they built this “complex app” in 48 hours, as if that is something to be celebrated. Sure, it’s cool that a working version of an app was up and running in two days, but how well does it work? How many bugs are still in it? Are there race conditions that cause a random crash?
My weather app has a weird race condition right now I’m tracking down. It crashes, on occasion, when opened from Spotlight on an iPhone. Not every time does that cause a crash, just sometimes.
I don’t vibe code my apps that way, and I know many other vibe coders that aren’t that way—but we all started with actual coding, not typing a prompt.
Anyone can be a vibe coder, but not all vibe coders are developers
“And when everyone’s super… no one will be.” – Syndrome, The Incredibles. It might be from a kids’ movie, but it rings true in the era of vibe coding. When everyone thinks they can build an app in a weekend, everyone thinks they’re a developer.
By contrast, not every vibe coder is actually a developer, and that’s the problem. It’s hard to know if the app you’re using was built by someone who has plans to support the app long-term or not—and that’s why there’s going to be a lot of broken apps in the future.
I can see it now, the apps that people built in a weekend as a challenge will simply go without updates. While the app might work for the first few weeks or months just fine, an API update comes along and breaks the app’s compatibility. It’s at that point we’ll see who was vibe coding to build an app versus who was vibe coding just for online clout—and the sad part is, consumers will lose out more often than not with broken apps.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.