Another airline tightens its portable battery rules – what to know before your next flight


Newark airport with a plane flying next to a rainbow

Newark airport with a plane flying next to a rainbow. 

Kerry Wan/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


Key takeaways

  • American Airlines passengers are limited to two portable chargers. 
  • Portable chargers must be visible or within reach for the flight. 
  • Take care to ensure you follow specific rules and regulations. 

As of May 1, 2026, American Airlines introduced new restrictions on portable chargers that passengers can bring and use in-flight for charging their electronic devices. 

The new rule, which is already in effect at the time of publication, stipulates that customers may carry only two power banks, which must be visible to airline staff while in use on flights. If the portable battery is not being used for charging, American Airlines told CBS News that chargers must remain within a passenger’s reach on the aircraft and cannot be stowed in an overhead bin. 

Also: High-speed Starlink internet rollout on United Airlines planes begins – and it’s free

American is not the first carrier to revise or update its policies. Last June, Southwest Airlines became the first American-based carrier to enact portable power rules after unveiling a similar policy that prevents travelers from keeping devices tucked into carry-on or overhead bags while they are plugged in. Southwest’s policy still permits one charger per person on the aircraft, and like American Airlines, Southwest also requires passengers to keep portable chargers fully in sight while in use. 

American’s policies specifically limit each person to two portable chargers, each of which may not exceed 100-watt-hour capacity. In addition to following the new guidelines to keep portable chargers visible or within reach, these devices may not be recharged aboard the aircraft

Also: When is the best time to book your flight? Google just spilled its airfare secrets

These stipulations apply to any external power bank that can be plugged into electronic devices, and some suitcases that feature built-in charging ports powered by lithium-ion batteries. 

Why is American making this change?

Remember, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) already prevents portable chargers and other lithium batteries from being stored in your checked bags for safety purposes. So, what’s with all the changes regarding the use of portable chargers in-flight? 

Lithium batteries power many portable chargers, and due to fire or combustion risk, airlines are striving to mitigate potential accidents or hazards before they occur. And with more savvy ways to charge on the go becoming the norm, there are more portable chargers on planes than ever before, and in turn, an increased number of chances for a lithium-battery malfunction.

The premise of these policies isn’t to necessarily eradicate lithium fires on planes. However, if a charger is always in sight or accessible, it’s much more likely that someone will spot a potential problem before it becomes a larger issue and handle the issue more quickly. 

Also: How this travel company’s AI rollout drove a 73% satisfaction boost: A 5-step playbook for your business

While a major problem is rare, the National Business Aviation Association says, “a smoke, fire, or extreme heat incident involving lithium ion batteries takes place aboard an aircraft more than once per week on average in the US.” 

What to keep in mind

If you’re traveling soon, it’s wise to verify your airline’s portable power policies before your departure. Southwest and American are the current US-based carriers with more restrictive policies, but many international airlines already have similar stipulations in place. You should verify the rules for each carrier you’ll be flying with, especially if you’re taking connecting flights.

If you have a suitcase with built-in lithium battery chargers, I would suggest researching a “dumber” option to either replace the suitcase or add something else to your travel repertoire so the restrictions aren’t an issue. 

Also: 12 travel gadgets that can upgrade your spring break (and they’re on sale)

If you own a portable power bank you’ve traveled with previously and would like to continue using it, give it a quick scan to make sure it’s in good condition. Make sure there are no visible tears, frays, or breaks on connected cords or included cables, or any visible discoloration that looks like it could be from heat damage (burn marks, unexplainable discoloration, etc). 

You’ll also want to verify battery wattage to ensure it matches your airline’s policy. This information is often printed on the back of power banks or can be found online by researching the brand and model number. 

Also: These pocket-sized tech gadgets are packed with purpose (and they’re inexpensive)

Since American prohibits recharging portable batteries in-flight, make sure you boost up your battery at the gate or before you board the plane. 

Portable power banks we recommend  

Need a recommendation for a portable power bank? Here are some devices that ZDNET experts prefer:





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Vibe coding has taken the development world by storm—and it truly is a modern marvel to behold. The problem is, the vibe coding rush is going to leave a lot of apps broken in its wake once people move on to the next craze. At the end of the day, many of us are going to be left with apps that are broken with no fixes in sight.

A lot of vibe “coders” are really just prompt typers

And they’ve never touched a line of code

An AI robot using a computer with a prompt field on the screen. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

Vibe coding made development available to the masses like never before. You can simply take an AI tool, type a prompt into a text box, and out pops an app. It probably needs some refinement, but, typically, version one is still functional whenever you’re vibe coding.

The problem comes from “developers” who have never written a line of code. They’re just using vibe coding because it’s cool or they think they can make a quick buck, but they really have no knowledge of development—or any desire to learn proper development.

Think of those types of vibe coders as people who realize they can use a calculator and online tools to solve math problems for them, so they try to build a rocket. They might be able to make something work in some way, but they’ll never reach the moon, even though they think they can.

Anyone can vibe code a prototype

But you really need to know what you’re doing to build for the long haul

For those who don’t know what they’re doing, vibe coding is a fantastic way to build a prototype. I’ve vibe coded several projects so far, and out of everything I’ve done, I’ve realized one thing—vibe coding is only as good as the person behind the keyboard. I have spent more time debugging the fruits of my vibe coding than I have actually vibe coding.

Each project that I’ve built with vibe coding could have easily been “viable” within an hour or two, sometimes even less time than that. But, to make something of actual quality, it has always taken many, many hours.

Vibe coding is definitely faster than traditional coding if you’re a one-man team, but it’s not something that is fast by any means if you’re after a quality product. The same goes for continued updates.

I’ve spent the better part of three months building a weather app for iPhone. It’s a simple app, but it also has quite a lot of complex things going on in the background.

It recently got released in the App Store—no small feat at all. But, I still get a few crash reports a week, and I’m constantly squashing bugs and working on new features for the app. This is because I’m planning on supporting the app for a long time, not just the weekend I released it, and that takes a lot more work.

Vibe coders often jump from app to app without thinking of longevity

The app was a weekend project, after all

A relaxed man lounging on an orange beanbag watches as a friendly yellow robot works on a laptop for him, while multiple red exclamation-mark warning icons float around them. Credit: Lucas Gouveia/How-To Geek | ViDI Studio/Shutterstock

I’ve seen it far too often, a vibe coder touting that they built this “complex app” in 48 hours, as if that is something to be celebrated. Sure, it’s cool that a working version of an app was up and running in two days, but how well does it work? How many bugs are still in it? Are there race conditions that cause a random crash?

My weather app has a weird race condition right now I’m tracking down. It crashes, on occasion, when opened from Spotlight on an iPhone. Not every time does that cause a crash, just sometimes.

If a vibe coder’s only goal is to build apps in short amounts of time so they can brag about how fast they built the app, they likely aren’t going to take the time to fix little things like that.

I don’t vibe code my apps that way, and I know many other vibe coders that aren’t that way—but we all started with actual coding, not typing a prompt.


Anyone can be a vibe coder, but not all vibe coders are developers

“And when everyone’s super… no one will be.” – Syndrome, The Incredibles. It might be from a kids’ movie, but it rings true in the era of vibe coding. When everyone thinks they can build an app in a weekend, everyone thinks they’re a developer.

By contrast, not every vibe coder is actually a developer, and that’s the problem. It’s hard to know if the app you’re using was built by someone who has plans to support the app long-term or not—and that’s why there’s going to be a lot of broken apps in the future.

I can see it now, the apps that people built in a weekend as a challenge will simply go without updates. While the app might work for the first few weeks or months just fine, an API update comes along and breaks the app’s compatibility. It’s at that point we’ll see who was vibe coding to build an app versus who was vibe coding just for online clout—and the sad part is, consumers will lose out more often than not with broken apps.



Source link