Inside QuantWare’s €152m round to build KiloFab



The Series B is the largest ever raised by a Dutch deeptech company, and the largest private round any dedicated quantum-processor company has closed. Intel Capital, In-Q-Tel, and ETF Partners are joining a syndicate that already had FORWARD.one and Invest-NL.


There is, in 2026, a very specific kind of European deeptech success story that policy-makers spend a lot of time trying to engineer and that the market produces only intermittently. Delft-based QuantWare announced that it has closed a Series B round of €152m ($178m), the largest ever raised by a Dutch deeptech company and the largest private round any dedicated quantum-processor company has closed worldwide.

The round was oversubscribed. The new investor list is unusually heavyweight: Intel Capital, In-Q-Tel (the CIA-backed strategic investor), and ETF Partners join an existing syndicate that includes FORWARD.one, Invest-NL Deep Tech Fonds, InnovationQuarter Capital, Ground State Ventures, and Graduate Ventures.

It is the second European quantum scale-up Series B of the week. It is also, by some distance, the larger of the two.

What QuantWare actually does

QuantWare was founded in July 2021 by Matthijs Rijlaarsdam (chief executive) and Dr Alessandro Bruno (chief technology officer), both of whom came out of QuTech, the quantum-research institute jointly run by TU Delft and TNO. TNW first profiled the company more than a year ago, at a moment when its commercial volumes were already conspicuous.

The company has shipped working quantum processors to more than 50 organisations across 20 countries and is, by its own framing and HPCwire’s description, the largest commercial supplier of quantum processors by volume in the world.

What separates QuantWare from the wider quantum-computing field is the architectural choice it has made. Most superconducting-qubit systems use 2D chip designs in which signal lines are routed laterally across the surface of a single processor, an approach that consumes space exponentially as qubit counts grow and that has, in practice, capped commercial systems at modest scale.

QuantWare’s VIO architecture is three-dimensional: chiplet modules are stacked vertically and connected through ultra-high-fidelity chip-to-chip links, with signal lines running between layers rather than across them. The architecture, in the company’s framing, scales the way commercial semiconductor processes have always scaled.

VIO-40K and the 10,000-qubit claim

The Series B follows the company’s late-April announcement of VIO-40K, a new generation of the architecture rated for processors with 10,000 qubits. The number is roughly 100x the current commercial state of the art, and the architecture supports up to 40,000 input-output lines through the chiplet-stack approach.

Quantum Computing Report’s coverage of the architecture launch described the design as the first credible commercial path to processors of that scale that does not rely on networking together many smaller systems, an approach that introduces its own latency and fidelity costs.

Reservations for VIO-40K are available now; first customer shipments are expected in 2028, according to QuantWare’s own announcement. The architecture is what made the Series B size economically defensible. Without a credible scaling roadmap, no quantum-hardware company has yet attracted private rounds of this scale. With one, the addressable market changes substantially.

KiloFab: where the cheque is being spent

Most of the new capital will go to KiloFab, which QuantWare describes as the world’s first dedicated fab for Quantum Open Architecture devices and one of the largest quantum-processor production facilities anywhere. The facility, located at the company’s Delft headquarters, is intended to expand QuantWare’s production capacity by roughly 20x.

Every other major quantum-computing company in the world either fabricates its own processors in vertically integrated facilities or buys from a small set of academic-scale fabs with limited capacity. KiloFab is designed to break that constraint by operating as an open-architecture commercial supplier to the wider industry.

If QuantWare can sustain its open-architecture supplier role across the next phase of quantum-processor demand, the company occupies a structurally similar position in quantum to what TSMC occupies in classical semiconductors: not the brand the customer sees, but the fabrication operation everyone else’s brand depends on.

QuantWare’s customer mix is unusually broad for the stage of the industry. The company sells to a combination of national technology institutes, large technology companies, and other commercial quantum-computing firms. The 20-country distribution is meaningful: most quantum hardware companies sell predominantly to local or single-region customers, and the geographic spread suggests QuantWare’s open-architecture proposition appeals to buyers who want to control their own quantum-software stack rather than buy a vertically integrated system.

The investor configuration reflects the same dynamic. Intel Capital’s participation is, in part, a strategic hedge: Intel itself has been pursuing trapped-ion quantum research, and a stake in the leading commercial superconducting-QPU supplier gives Intel optionality across architectures.

In-Q-Tel’s involvement signals US-government-adjacent customer interest. ETF Partners’ climate-orientated investment thesis ties into the energy efficiency of QuantWare’s chiplet approach, which the company says delivers exponentially more compute per watt than competing scaling strategies.

The named existing investors matter too.

General partner Robin van Boxsel framed his firm’s continued participation as supporting QuantWare’s path “to becoming one of the world’s most important technology companies.”

Yvonne Greeuw at Invest-NL framed the deal as a contribution to Dutch “strategic autonomy and future earnings capacity,” the kind of language that, when applied to a private financing round, signals that this is being read by the Dutch state itself as an industrial-policy outcome.

Three things follow from the announcement that go beyond QuantWare itself. The first is that European deeptech can, in 2026, attract Series B rounds at a scale historically associated with US Series Cs and Ds. €152m is not a US-style late-stage round, but it is the largest such round any Dutch deeptech company has closed, and it suggests the European ceiling for hardware-led deeptech financings has moved up materially.

The second is that quantum computing has, finally, attracted strategic-investor capital from outside the dedicated quantum-VC pool. Intel Capital and In-Q-Tel are not quantum-thesis funds. Their participation, alongside ETF Partners’ climate-thesis cheque, suggests that the quantum sector has crossed a threshold from speculative-research investment into adjacent strategic interest. That changes the funding ecosystem for the whole category.

The third is industrial policy. Europe has been talking about “sovereign” quantum infrastructure for years, with limited concrete output. QuantWare’s KiloFab, by contrast, is a real building with real capital behind it, designed to be the world’s largest open-architecture quantum-processor production facility.

If it operates as planned, the Netherlands will host one of the most strategically consequential commercial-quantum operations in the world. That outcome was, two years ago, a policy aspiration. On Monday’s evidence, it has become a financing reality.

Rijlaarsdam, in his own framing of the announcement, kept the message simple. “Quantum computers will help solve humanity’s biggest challenges, but only if they can be built at industrial scale,” he said. “That is exactly what we’re working on.”

The Series B has now provided the capital.

The 2028 first-shipment commitment provides the deadline. Between those two dates, what was, until recently, a TU Delft research project becomes either the European semiconductor success story of the decade or a cautionary tale about the limits of architectural ambition. The investors backing it have seen enough of the engineering to bet on the first outcome. What follows is execution.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


The first computer my family owned was an 80286 IBM clone, and it had lots of ports, none of which looked the same. There was a big 5-pin DIN for the keyboard, a serial port, a parallel port, a game port for our joystick, and of course, the VGA port for the monitor.

In comparison, a modern computer has much less diversity in the port department. Not only are there fewer types of ports, but the total number may be quite low as well. When we move to modern laptops, it can be much more minimalist. Some laptops have just a single port on the entire machine! Is this a bad thing? As with anything, the extremes are rarely ideal, but I’d say overall, this has been a pretty positive development for PCs.

The port explosion era was never sustainable

It was more like a port infection

You see, the reason we had so many ports for so long is that people kept inventing new interfaces to make up for the shortcomings of existing ones. However, instead of the newer, better interfaces making the old ones obsolete, they just became additive as perfectly summarized in this classic XKCD comic.

A comic illustrates how competing standards multiply: first showing 14 competing standards, then people agreeing to create one universal standard, followed by a final panel showing there are now 15 competing standards. Credit: Randall Munroe (CC-BY-NC)

In laptops, the need for so many ports reached ridiculous heights. In this video posted by X user PC Philanthropy, you can see his Sager/Clevo D9T absolutely packed with all the trimmings leading to a rather massive laptop.

It is undeniably a cool machine, but obviously goes against the principle of portable computing. Also, every port you install means power and space that could have been taken up by something else. That’s true for laptops and desktops.



















Quiz
8 Questions · Test Your Knowledge

PC ports and motherboard I/O
Trivia challenge

Think you know your USB from your PCIe? Put your connector knowledge to the test.

PortsStandardsHardwareConnectorsMotherboards

Which USB connector type is fully reversible, meaning it can be plugged in either way?

Correct! USB Type-C features a symmetrical oval design that lets you insert it in either orientation. Introduced in 2014, it has become the dominant connector for modern devices and supports everything from data transfer to video output and fast charging.

Not quite — the answer is USB Type-C. The older USB Type-A connector (the flat rectangular one) famously required you to flip it at least twice before getting it right. USB Type-C’s reversible design was one of its biggest selling points when it launched in 2014.

What does the ‘x16’ in a PCIe x16 slot refer to?

Exactly right! PCIe x16 means the slot has 16 data lanes, allowing significantly more bandwidth than smaller x1 or x4 slots. This is why discrete graphics cards almost always use x16 slots — they need that extra throughput to feed pixel data to your display.

Not quite — the ‘x16’ refers to the number of data lanes. More lanes mean more simultaneous data paths between the CPU and the card. Graphics cards use x16 slots because their massive data demands require all 16 of those lanes working together.

Which port on a motherboard is most commonly used to connect a display directly to the CPU’s integrated graphics?

That’s correct! The HDMI and DisplayPort connectors found on a motherboard’s rear I/O panel are wired directly to the CPU’s integrated graphics unit. If you have a discrete GPU installed, you should use that card’s outputs instead for best performance.

The right answer is the HDMI or DisplayPort connectors on the rear I/O panel. These ports bypass the discrete GPU entirely and tap into the CPU’s built-in graphics. It’s a common troubleshooting trap — plugging a monitor into the motherboard instead of the GPU and wondering why nothing works.

What is the primary function of the 24-pin ATX connector on a motherboard?

Spot on! The 24-pin ATX connector is the main power connector that delivers multiple voltage rails — including 3.3V, 5V, and 12V — from the power supply to the motherboard. Without it seated properly, your PC simply won’t power on at all.

The correct answer is delivering power from the PSU to the motherboard. The 24-pin ATX connector is the big wide plug you’ll find on every modern motherboard. It supplies several different voltage levels that the board distributes to components. PCIe cards get their supplemental power from separate 6- or 8-pin connectors directly from the PSU.

Which of the following rear I/O ports transmits both audio and video in a single cable and is most commonly found on modern motherboards?

Correct! HDMI carries both high-definition audio and video over a single cable, making it one of the most convenient display connectors available. It became standard on motherboards as integrated graphics improved, and modern versions support 4K and even 8K resolutions.

The answer is HDMI. VGA is analog-only and carries no audio, DVI-D is digital video only without audio, and S-Video is an older analog format. HDMI bundles both audio and video digitally, which is why it became the go-to connector for TVs, monitors, and motherboard rear panels alike.

What maximum theoretical data transfer speed does USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 support?

Impressive! USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 achieves 20 Gbps by using two 10 Gbps lanes simultaneously — that’s what the ‘2×2’ means. It requires a USB Type-C connector and is most commonly found on high-end motherboards, making it ideal for fast external SSDs.

The correct answer is 20 Gbps. The ‘2×2’ in the name is the key clue — it bonds two 10 Gbps channels together. USB naming got notoriously confusing around this era, with the same physical port potentially supporting very different speeds depending on the generation label printed in the spec sheet.

What is the role of the M.2 slot found on most modern motherboards?

Well done! M.2 is a compact form-factor slot that most commonly hosts NVMe SSDs, which connect via PCIe lanes for blazing-fast storage speeds. Some M.2 slots also support SATA-based SSDs and Wi-Fi/Bluetooth combo cards, making the slot surprisingly versatile.

The correct answer is housing compact storage drives or wireless cards. M.2 replaced the older mSATA standard and supports both PCIe NVMe drives and SATA drives depending on the slot’s keying. NVMe M.2 drives can achieve sequential read speeds many times faster than traditional SATA SSDs.

Which audio connector color on a standard PC rear I/O panel is designated for the main stereo line output to speakers or headphones?

That’s right! The green 3.5mm jack is the standard line-out port used for speakers and headphones in the PC audio color-coding scheme. Blue is line-in for recording, and pink is the microphone input — a color system that’s been consistent across PC motherboards for decades.

The correct answer is green. PC audio jacks follow a long-standing color convention: green for headphones and speakers, blue for line-in (recording from external sources), and pink for the microphone. It’s one of those legacy standards that has quietly persisted even as USB and digital audio have become more common.

Challenge Complete

Your Score

/ 8

Thanks for playing!

USB-C (almost) solved the problem

So close, but not quite there yet

Released to the public in the mid ’90s, USB came to the rescue. The “U” is for “Universal” and for the most part USB has lived up to that promise. Now there was one port that handled data and power. More importantly, USB is fully backwards compatible. So if you plug a USB 1.1 device into a modern USB port, it should work. Whether you can get software drivers for it is another story, but it will talk to the host device.

USB-C has proven to be less universal than I’d like, and the situation is still far better than it used to be. A single USB-C port on one of my laptops can act as a video output for just about anything, even an old VGA monitor.

A Macbook, CRT monitor, and iPad connected together. Credit: Sydney Louw Butler/How-To Geek

My smaller laptops don’t need special chargers anymore, and the latest laptops can pull 240W over USB-C, which is enough for all but the beefiest desktop replacement machines. There is no type of peripheral I can think of that doesn’t give you the option to use it over USB.

But the complaints aren’t so much that we only get USB these days, it’s more that we get so little of it.

Minimal I/O enables better hardware design

Harder, better, faster, stronger

When you only put a handful of USB-C ports on a mobile computer, you reap numerous benefits. The low profile of USB-C means the laptop can be thinner, and the frame can be a stronger and more rigid unibody design. Internally, you have room for more battery, larger performance components, or better cooling.

A green Apple MacBook Neo on display on a wooden table with a product sign behind it. Credit: Patrick Campanale / How-To Geek

It also means the internals can be simpler, and cheaper to design and fabricate, though whether those savings are passed on to customers is another story altogether.

Wireless and cloud-first workflows reduce physical dependency

I guess they are “air” ports

Perhaps the first sign of major change was when smartphones dropped headphone jacks, but the fact is that wireless technologies are now good enough for most peripheral and data connections. So, there’s no need to connect them directly to a port on a computer. Which, in turn, means that there’s no reason to have as many ports on the computer in the first place.

I can’t remember the last time I used a wired mouse or keyboard, and I only use Ethernet for devices that need extremely high speeds, low latency, or improved reliability. For normal day-to-day use, modern Wi-Fi is just fine. So while your laptop might not have as many wired ports on the outside, those wireless chips on the inside still give it numerous connectivity options for audio, input, and data transfer.

You could even make the same argument about storage to some extent, with many thin and light systems leaning on cloud storage to make up for a lack of ports to connect external storage.

MacBook Neo colors on a white background.

Operating System

macOS

CPU

A18 Pro

The MacBook Neo with the A18 Pro chip is Apple’s most affordable laptop yet, with all-day battery life and buttery-smooth performance in a thin and light profile.



The dongle backlash misses the bigger picture

The last bit of the port protest centers around dongles, but I never understood the complaints. Having one port that can be broken out into whatever ports you need using a little box is amazing. It makes ports optional and gives you the choice. If you never plug your laptop into anything, why deal with all the ports you’ll never use?

Likewise, if you only ever use ports with your laptop when you dock it at a desk, then you can just leave your dongle ready to go on your desk, but throwing a small dongle in your laptop sleeve or bag in case you might need it is a small price to pay for all the benefits of minimal IO.



Source link