Tim Cook is stepping down as Apple CEO—here’s his replacement


As rumored for months, Tim Cook is stepping down as Apple CEO. He will shift to an executive chair role on September 1st, 2026, when Senior Vice President of Hardware Engineering John Ternus will lead the company.

The move comes after a “thoughtful, long-term succession planning process,” according to Apple. Cook will still contribute to “certain aspects” of Apple as executive chair, including talks with politicians worldwide.

As part of the shift, Apple is naming Senior Hardware Technologies VP Johny Srouji to a new Chief Hardware Officer position, effective immediately. The position will give him an “expanded role” that covers both Ternus’ Hardware Engineering unit and hardware technologies.

Tim Cook’s long legacy

Big successes, but also a few failures

Tim Cook left Compaq to join Apple in 1998, shortly after co-founder Steve Jobs returned. He’s best known for turning around Apple’s operations, taking it from months of unsold stock and lengthy product rollouts to lean inventory and quick releases. He’s also known making smart bets on component purchases like flash memory, which helped make the 2005 iPod nano a hit and today helps Apple limit the damage of the AI-fueled RAM crisis.

He briefly stepped into the CEO role at Apple in 2009 during one of Jobs’ medical leaves, and again at the start of 2011. He formally took over the role in August 2011, when Jobs permanently stepped down as his health deteriorated.

Cook has greatly expanded Apple since taking over — it now has a market cap of over $4 trillion, or more than 1,000% what it was in 2011. The iPhone remains its central product, but the company under Cook’s watch has introduced hits like AirPods, Apple Watch, and Apple Silicon-based Macs. It also derives much more revenue from services, including Apple Music and Apple TV.

There have been notable missteps. A long-rumored car project never came to fruition. Vision Pro sales have been limited to a relatively small number of enthusiasts and professionals, and MacBooks between 2015 and 2020 were plagued by both keyboard quality issues and sluggish performance from Intel-based chips. Apple Intelligence also drew flak as Apple promised features that simply weren’t ready, and won’t be until a Google Gemini-powered Siri arrives this year.

Who is John Ternus, Apple’s new CEO?

A hardware genius with deep roots at Apple

John Ternus is no stranger to Apple, having worked at the company for 25 years. He first worked on Apple’s monitors, but in 2013 became a Vice President of Hardware Engineering that helped lead work on AirPods, iPads, and Macs. He took control of iPhone development in 2020 and took charge of Apple Watch work in 2022, the year after he became Senior VP.

Reports have circulated that Ternus was a likely candidate for the CEO position, both because of his product focus and personality. He’s “charismatic and well-liked,” according to Bloomberg. That makes him a potentially ideal leader for a company that still focuses on hardware.

In announcing the transition from Cook, Apple notes that Ternus has pioneered innovative material uses like the Apple Watch Ultra 3’s 3D-printed titanium, and has made strides forward in repairability and durability. If your iPhone or Mac lasts longer, you might have Ternus to thank.

His choice makes clear Apple’s leadership strategy. It’s still choosing veterans rather than outsiders, and doesn’t see the need for a shakeup any time soon.

Apple AirPods 4 TAG

Bluetooth

5.3

IP Rating

IP54

Driver Size

Custom high-excursion Apple driver

Weight

0.25 Pounds

Charging Port

USB-C

Compatibility

Apple devices

The fourth generation Apple AirPods feature a more comfortable design, an improved H2 chip, better sound quality, and the option for Active Noise Control.




Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link