I tested Artix Linux: An enjoyable systemd-free distro for experienced users (and ChromeOS speeds)


Artix Linux

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Artix is a Linux distribution with a different approach, but plenty to offer.
  • It offers a very fast boot time and outstanding all-around performance.
  • Artix uses the OpenRC init system and ships with a bare minimum of apps.

“The art of Linux” — that’s where the name for the Artix distribution comes from, and this modern, independent take on Linux takes the art in its name seriously.

But don’t be misled; Artix (an Arch-based rolling release distribution) isn’t geared toward artists (although it certainly could be). Rather, Artix is about the art of creating a unique Linux distribution while replacing several of the usual bits and pieces.

Also: France is replacing 2.5 million Windows desktops with Linux – and I mapped out its new stack

For example, Artix eschews systemd in favor of either OpenRC or dinit (user’s choice), as well as XLibre or Wayland, in place of Xorg. According to the Artix FAQ, the developers “love systemd,” but would never use it. And by cutting out systemd, the developers can be certain that upstream changes won’t eventually affect the project and that systemd cannot creep into the binary packages.

I don’t want to get in the weeds, but I will say this: Systemd may not be loved by all, but it has become the standard. Because of that, the distributions that refuse to adopt it will struggle to gain much ground.

That’s a shame, because some of those systemd-less distributions are actually quite good. Such is the case with Artix. Upon installing Artix (which was very easy), the first thing I noticed was how fast it boots; we’re talking ChromeOS-speed here. Don’t blink; otherwise, you’ll miss the bootup.

Also: How to use Linux without ever touching the terminal

Once I’d logged in, I immediately noticed yet another thing Artix does differently. Most modern distributions that use KDE Plasma as the desktop environment keep the now-default floating panel option. I believe that gives the desktop a bit more modernity, which I love. Artix doesn’t go that route and, instead, opts for a traditional panel. Of course, the theme is dark (which has also become the norm – much to my disappointment). There’s just enough transparency, and the overall effect is quite nice.

Artix Linux

The Artix theme is quite nice (if you like dark desktops).

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

Preinstalled apps

Click on the menu, however, and you’ll see that Artix doesn’t ship with much in the way of user applications. Sure, there’s a menu for Office, but all it contains is Okular PDF viewer. Okay then, let’s get some apps installed to make this distribution usable.

Also: My 11 favorite Linux distributions of all time, ranked

Ruh roh… there’s no app store, which means we’re going to have to take care of things from the command line. Click the menu and then System > Konsole, to open the terminal window. 

Let’s try and install a GUI app store.

sudo pacman -Sy octopi

Fingers crossed. Then, bingo! In seconds, I had the Octopi GUI app store installed. Menu > System > Octopi to open the new app and start with the installation of the software I need. A little bit of LibreOffice, a dash of GIMP, a smidge of VLC media player, and Flatpak to pick up the slack. Unfortunately, there’s no support for Flatpak apps in Octopi. 

Artix Linux

Octopic is about as good as it gets for an Arch-based GUI app store.

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

Given that it’s not recommended to use KDE Discover on an Arch-based distribution, it looks as if all Flatpak apps will have to be managed via the command line. That’s not a problem for me, but for those who aren’t accustomed to the CLI (Command Line Interface), it might be a bit of a hurdle. But then again, that’s kind of the nature of Arch and all of its derivatives. 

One other oddity is that Artix opts for the Falkon web browser. Although I respect Falkon and think it’s a viable option, I don’t think it’s exactly a browser for the masses. 

OpenRC

I’ve been using systemd for so long that I’d forgotten what it was like to use a different initialization manager. Well, Artix ships with OpenRC. Turns out, it’s not terribly challenging. For example, say you want to start the SSH service. To start the SSH daemon, the command would be:

sudo rc-service sshd start

Simple. The same thing holds true for stopping and restarting, so:

sudo rc-service sshd stop

sudo rc-service ssh restart

How does Artix perform?

Here’s another area where I have zero complaints. Artix is like so many other Linux distributions I’ve used: it’s fast. From boot to application installation to opening apps, Artix’s speed is impressive. 

Also: Ready for a Linux laptop? I found one that competes with my MacBook Pro

I did my usual test with Ollama local AI. I will say that downloading the Ollama service took much longer than expected, but that could be the problem of their servers and not Artix.

Because Aritx uses OpenRC, I had to create an init file for Ollama. To do that, I created the new file called ollama in the /etc/init_d/ directory (NOTE: Swap out the _ for a . in this command and all previous commands that point to the OpenRC initialization directory).

sudo nano /etc/init_d/ollama

In that file, I added the following:

#!/sbin/openrc-run

command=”/usr/local/bin/ollama serve”

command_background=true

pidfile=”/run/ollama.pid”

name=”ollama”

depend() {

    need net

}

start_pre() {

    checkpath –directory –mode 0755 /run

}

Save and close the file.

Give the file executable permissions with:

sudo chmod +x /etc/init_d/ollama

Add the service with:

sudo rc-update add ollama default

Start the service with:

sudo rc-service ollama start

You’re good to go.

I pulled the llama3.2 LLM and ran my queries, and Artix/Ollama replied without hesitation. Well played, Artix, well played.

Who is Artix for?

The answer to this question is pretty simple: If you tend to trod your own path and feel like you might enjoy an operating system that challenges you just enough to stretch your Linux prowess, Artix might be a good fit. Most everything it does is a bit different, but it does it all well enough that I find this Linux distribution a viable and enjoyable option.

Also: 10 Linux apps I install on every new machine (and why you should, too)

However, if you’re not into bucking the system, you might consider EndeavorOS Titan as your Arch-based distribution.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link