Gmail finally offers end-to-end encryption for email on Android and iPhone


Fully encrypted email has been available in at least some form for Gmail since the end of 2022, but now it’s finally ready for mobile. Google is now offering end-to-end encryption (E2EE) for Gmail on Android devices and iPhones through the official email app.

The move comes days after Google simplified encryption for Workspace users on the desktop, and follows a similar approach. If both the sender and recipient are using the Gmail app, encrypted messages will appear like typical email threads. You only have to tap the lock icon and choose “additional encryption.” Recipients who don’t use the Gmail client will be sent to a secure web page to read and reply to those messages.

As with the earlier rollout, end-to-end encryption access is currently limited to organizations using Google Workspace, particularly those using an Enterprise Plus plan with either the Assured Controls or Assured Controls Plus add-on. Your administrator will have to enable client-side encryption on Android and iOS.

Why does end-to-end encryption matter for Gmail?

It’s not just more secure, it’s the law

As Google is eager to explain, end-to-end encrypted email has historically been difficult. Companies have typically needed to implement Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) by issuing security certificates to every user, while the users have to enable and exchange those certificates before they can even begin sending emails. They may also need to use separate apps and web portals.

An example of an app that supports end to end encryption is Telegram.


What Is End-to-End Encryption, and Why Does It Matter?

The best way to keep your sensitive data safe from prying eyes.

Google’s approach still isn’t completely seamless, given that some recipients still have to rely on web browsers. However, it streamlines the process for both you and your employer’s IT manager. You don’t have to obtain or even understand certificates — so long as both sides have the technology enabled, a quick toggle is all you need to get started.

The move makes it more likely that you’ll use end-to-end encryption, and thus lock down sensitive data (including attachments) the moment you send a message. There should be less chance that criminals or government surveillance agents will intercept your conversations.

This isn’t just about maintaining company security policies. In some cases, it might be required under the law. Legislation like the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has firm rules governing privacy and security when handling info. There may be legal consequences if your employer doesn’t do enough to shield sensitive data.

Some governments, including the EU, also have data sovereignty laws or initiatives that require storing at least some data within their borders. End-to-end encryption reduces the chances that something you send through Gmail will land in another country.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Do you ever walk past a person on the streets exhibiting mental health issues and wonder what happened to their family? I have a brother—or at least, I used to. I worry about where he is and hope he is safe. He hasn’t taken my call since 2014.

James and his brother as young children playing together before his brother became sick. James is on the right and his brother is on the left.

James and his brother as young children playing together before his brother became sick. James is on the right and his brother is on the left.

When I was 13, I had a very bad day. I was in the back of the car, and what I remember most was the world-crushing sound violently panging off every surface: he was pounding his fists into the steering wheel, and I worried it would break apart. He was screaming at me and my mother, and I remember the web of saliva and tears hanging over his mouth. His eyes were red, and I knew this day would change everything between us. My brother was sick.

Nearly 20 years later, I still have trouble thinking about him. By the time we realized he was mentally ill, he was no longer a minor. The police brought him to a facility for the standard 72-hour hold, where he was diagnosed with paranoid delusional schizophrenia. Concluding he was not a danger to himself or others, they released him.

There was only one problem: at 18, my brother told the facility he was not related to us and that we were imposters. When they let him out, he refused to come home.

My parents sought help and even arranged for medication, but he didn’t take it. Before long, he disappeared.

My brother’s decline and disappearance had nothing to do with the common narratives about drug use or criminal behavior. He was sick. By the time my family discovered his condition, he was already 18 and legally independent from our custody.

The last time he let me visit, I asked about his bed. I remember seeing his dirty mattress on the floor beside broken glass and garbage. I also asked about the laptop my parents had gifted him just a year earlier. He needed the money, he said—and he had maxed out my parents’ credit card.

In secret from my parents, I gave him all the cash I had saved. I just wanted him to be alright.

My parents and I tried texting and calling him; there was no response except the occasional text every few weeks. But weeks turned into months.

Before long, I was graduating from high school. I begged him to come. When I looked in the bleachers, he was nowhere to be seen. I couldn’t help but wonder what I had done wrong.

The last time I heard from him was over the phone in 2014. I tried to tell him about our parents and how much we all missed him. I asked him to be my brother again, but he cut me off, saying he was never my brother. After a pause, he admitted we could be friends. Making the toughest call of my life, I told him he was my brother—and if he ever remembers that, I’ll be there, ready for him to come back.

I’m now 32 years old. I often wonder how different our lives would have been if he had been diagnosed as a minor and received appropriate care. The laws in place do not help families in my situation.

My brother has no social media, and we suspect he traded his phone several years ago. My family has hired private investigators over the years, who have also worked with local police to try to track him down.

One private investigator’s report indicated an artist befriended my brother many years ago. When my mother tried contacting the artist, they said whatever happened between them was best left in the past and declined to respond. My mom had wanted to wish my brother a happy 30th birthday.

My brother grew up in a safe, middle-class home with two parents. He had no history of drug use or criminal record. He loved collecting vintage basketball cards, eating mint chocolate chip ice cream, and listening to Motown music. To my parents, there was no smoking gun indicating he needed help before it was too late.

The next time you think about a person screaming outside on the street, picture their families. We need policies and services that allow families to locate and support their loved ones living with mental illness, and stronger protections to ensure that individuals leaving facilities can transition into stable care. Current laws, including age-based consent rules, the limits of 72-hour holds, and the lack of step-down or supported housing options, leave too many families without resources when a serious diagnosis occurs.

Governments and lawmakers need to do better for people like my brother. As someone who thinks about him every day, I can tell you the burden is too heavy to carry alone.

James Finney-Conlon is a concerned brother and mental health advocate. He can be reached at [email protected].



Source link