Sonos Play vs Sonos Move 2: Why I’d go with the $200 cheaper Bluetooth speaker


Sonos Move vs Sonos Play

Christian de Looper & Jada Jones/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


Sonos’ portable Bluetooth speakers are great additions to a seasoned Sonos fan’s system and a solid option for less dedicated customers who want easy access to the Sonos ecosystem. 

Unlike the company’s wired smart speakers, the Sonos Play and Move 2 are designed to live outside of Sonos’ tight ecosystem from time to time, making them worthy competitors to JBL and Bose contemporaries.

Also: Sonos Play review: This portable Wi-Fi speaker may be Sonos’ greatest hit yet

It’s easy to think there’s not much difference between the Play and Move 2 aside from size and price, but there are more factors to consider before making a decision. 

Specifications

Sonos Play Sonos Move 2
Battery life Up to 24 hours Up to 24 hours
Connectivity Wi-Fi; Bluetooth; AirPlay Wi-Fi; Bluetooth; AirPlay
Weight 2.87 lbs 6.61 lbs
Durability rating IP67 (dustproof and waterproof) IP56 (dust-protected and water-resistant)
Wired options USB-C; line-in; Ethernet (adapters sold separately) USB-C; line-in; Ethernet (adapters sold separately)
Price $299 $499

You should buy the Sonos Play if…

Sonos Play

Jada Jones/ZDNET

1. Your adventures go beyond your property line

The Sonos Play is more equipped for outdoor adventures than the Move 2, thanks to its durability rating. Sonos fitted the Play speaker with an IP67 rating, meaning it is dustproof and can withstand immersion in up to about three feet of water for 30 minutes. 

Additionally, the Play speaker is smaller and lighter than the Move 2, making it a great choice for bringing big, loud sound to parks and outdoor gatherings.

Review: Sonos Play

The Move 2 has an IP56 durability rating, making it dust-protected but not safe for accidental submersion in water. Its larger frame and more internal acoustic components make it nearly four pounds heavier than the Play and more difficult to lug around.

2. Bose and JBL don’t excite you

If the JBL Charge 6 and Bose SoundLink Plus don’t float your boat for whatever reason, the Sonos Play may be more appealing. Like its counterparts from Bose and JBL, the Sonos Play features dust- and waterproof durability ratings, reverse USB-C charging, a speaker grouping mode, and a three-pound frame for easy portability.

Also: Two years later, should you still buy the Sonos Ace? Why my answer is a resounding yes

However, the Sonos Play offers Wi-Fi connectivity, a feature that both Bose and JBL midrange portable speakers lack. Over Wi-Fi, the Sonos Play offers higher-quality audio streaming and interoperability with other Sonos speakers.

You should buy the Sonos Move 2 if…

Sonos Move 2

Christian de Looper/ZDNET

1. You’re not ready for an Era speaker

The Sonos Move 2 speaker is the final step before venturing into Sonos’ line of powered smart home speakers. The Era 100 and Era 300 speakers offer similar audio features to the Sonos Move 2, including Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, Apple AirPlay compatibility, adjustable EQ, Sonos Voice Assistant, and TruePlay.

Also: How to improve your Sonos soundbar’s audio performance – 3 easy and free ways

The Era 100 speaker and the Move 2 share the same acoustic structure, comprised of three Class-D amplifiers, two tweeters, and one midwoofer. However, the Era speakers require a permanent connection to a power source, while the Move 2 can move (no pun intended) between rooms and environments.

2. You host more than you attend

The Move 2 is a bulky portable speaker, with a 10-inch by 6-inch by 5-inch frame and weighing over six pounds. As a result, it’s not an easy speaker to take on a day trip or through the airport, but it is great for resting on your patio or countertop while entertaining guests or having a solo jam session.

Also: Should you buy a Sonos or Samsung sound system? I compared both brands to find out

The Move 2’s acoustic structure is more advanced than the Play’s, making it better suited for more critical listening, delivering tighter bass and increased audio separation. Its refined sound, coupled with its less portable stature, makes it best suited for listening around your house.

Writer’s choice

I prefer the Sonos Play over the Sonos Move 2. I only have three rooms in my house, and they all use a Sonos soundbar as a smart speaker. Therefore, the Play is the best option for me, as I can take it into rooms without Sonos speakers, such as my kitchen or bathroom, while staying connected to and switching between my other Sonos speakers. 

Additionally, the Play speaker is much easier to take outside my house than the Move 2, and it’s sufficient for me to use while lounging on my small outdoor patio.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link