DC’s most anticipated series is wrapped up in controversy—can Lanterns survive the backlash?


Lanterns is one of the most highly anticipated HBO Max releases of 2026. The series is set to bring the popular Green Lanterns officially to the DCU, although Guy Gardner has already appeared in 2025’s Superman.

Unfortunately, the franchise has been surrounded by controversy since the teaser’s debut last month. Lanterns could prove its detractors wrong, but for now, things don’t look good for what should be one of the DCU’s most important titles.

The upcoming Lanterns series has been plagued with bad press since the teaser

Fans already believe the creators have “lost the plot”

The Green Lanterns are one of the most important groups in the entire DC mythos. They have changed a fair bit since their 1940s introduction with Alan Scott, but their popularity has remained fairly consistent throughout the decades. It’s not outlandish to claim that the Green Lanterns are one of the most popular superhero organizations of all time. It’s why all eyes were on the DCU after it announced a Green Lanterns HBO Max series back in January 2023.

For two years, almost nothing had been released about the series aside from somewhat irregular casting updates. Lanterns’ creators are Chris Mundy, Damon Lindelof, and Tom King. Aside from the creative team, the plot remained a mystery. The project also experienced several delays, which fueled the controversies for the series, the first of which began during casting.

Fans almost unanimously agreed that Aaron Piere was meant to play John Stewart. His physique, temperament, and background are literally perfect for the character and are shaping him up to be a fan favorite before the show even comes out. The same thing cannot be said for his equally important co-stars.

A plethora of people believe Kyle Chandler is simply too old to play Hal Jordan. He is one of the most popular Lanterns in the entire franchise, so it’s fair to say anyone who played the role would receive some controversy. Yet, the fact that creators were also considering Josh Brolin for the role indicates that they have a particular and aged vision for the popular character. Interestingly enough, the creators have found themselves in similarly hot waters after a series of jokes were apparently misconstrued.

hbomax_logo.jpg

Subscription with ads

Yes, $10.99/month

Simultaneous streams

2 or 4


One of the show’s main controversies comes from the creators themselves

Damon Lindelof has learned the hard way that many fans take things quite literally

Lanterns_Title_Card_With_Ring Credit: Image via HBO Max

Lindelof is one of Lanterns’ co-creators. He’s best known for his work on 2004’s Lost and is nothing short of incredibly talented. His work speaks for itself. Lost might have a seriously controversial ending, but it is still considered one of the best serials of all time. Lindelof’s other work, including Watchmen and The Leftovers, has received similar critical acclaim, which is why his Lanterns’ controversy might be confusing for fans who don’t know the entire situation.

While on the comedy podcast Lovett or Leave It,, Lindelof was asked why the title was shortened from Green Lanterns to simply Lanterns. The series co-creator responded in jest that the color green was “stupid,” which is why it was removed. This was obviously a joke, but the lack of the color green in the Lanterns teaser trailer has led many fans to believe that Lindelof was never joking in the first place.

On March 16, 2025, Lindelof made a post on Instagram walking back his previous jokes. This decision was likely a mix of his own choice and the PR team of the highly anticipated show. The post has been inundated with criticism, aside from several positive comments from many prominent DCU actors, including Nathan Fillion, among others.

Of course, the DC Studios co-CEO, James Gunn, also shared his support for the series co-creator. Yet, that has only provided an opportunity for fans to bring their criticisms to the DC Studios co-chair. Many fans believe his direction for the popular intergalactic police force could be what ultimately makes or breaks the show. Many outspoken fans have highlighted how James Gunn’s more “grounded approach” directly contradicts the Green Lantern Corps at its core.

James Gunn’s more grounded approach is making fans nervous

Green Lanterns simply aren’t meant to be realistic

Green_Lantern_Suit Credit: Image via HBO Max

The Green Lanterns are made up of a majority of intergalactic beings, each dedicated to policing a dedicated part of the galaxy. Restricting The Lanterns to earth for the upcoming series has led many fans to believe the creators might not understand the characters they are adapting. Aside from Lindelof’s off-putting jokes, the series has had little to no promotion surrounding it. Moreover, the teaser trailer, which was supposed to create necessary hype among fans, fell severely flat.

To some fans, everything in the trailer felt off. From Chandler’s Hal Jordan’s interesting teaching methods and the less-than-accurate Green Lantern suit to the lack of powers demonstrated within the trailer and the choice to focus on a rural Midwestern town, nothing about this series seems befitting of the popular Green Lantern Corps. However, James Gunn has maintained his faith in the project and has urged fans to do the same.

Finn and Jake outside of a locked gate in Adventure Time.


10 Family-Friendly TV Shows That Are Surprisingly Adult

These TV shows are suitable for kids and adults alike.

James Gunn’s 2025 Superman film received a fair bit of unnecessary criticism before the movie even reached theaters. It’s entirely possible that every single one of the many controversies will be addressed in the series. Unfortunately, the great deal of criticism laid on the project means that there’s little chance audiences will go into the show with a positive mindset. That being said, how poorly can the series really be with such a talented cast and production team?

Lanterns could either prove fans wrong or become the first pariah of the DCU

Fans could be making a mountain out of a molehill, or they might be completely right

Characters Hal Jordan and John Stewart, Green Lanterns

Ultimately, fans will have to wait until August 2026 to see if Lanterns is even worth the criticism. While it’s somewhat strange for a project to receive such backlash before anything is officially released, the show is set to cover one of the most popular groups in all comic book history. Lindelof’s jokes might not have doomed the series, but it definitely helped to form the project’s somewhat illicit reputation. Hopefully, the showrunners can turn things around and release a series that proves all the criticism was based on conjecture.


lanterns-2026-tv-show-logo-on-black-poster.jpg


Lanterns


Release Date

August, 2026

Network

HBO

Showrunner

Chris Mundy






Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link