Don’t make these 4 mistakes when building a DIY SSD


If you’ve got an old SSD lying around, one of the best things you can do with it is repurpose it into an external SSD. A DIY external SSD can also end up being lighter on your wallet than a regular external drive, especially now that storage prices have gone through the roof.

However, as simple as building your own SSD is, there are still some honest mistakes you can make, which you should avoid.

Don’t buy an incompatible SSD enclosure

Make sure your SSD fits the enclosure you’re eyeing before pulling the trigger

If you own a 2.5-inch SATA SSD, all you have to do is get a cheap enclosure for 2.5-inch SATA drives, right? Correct, just make sure it supports at least USB 3.0 transfer speeds (5Gbps or higher), because some cheap SATA enclosures only offer USB 2.0 bandwidth, which is fine for hard drives but bad news for SATA SSDs.

Also, don’t accidentally purchase a 3.5-inch enclosure; most do support both 2.5-inch SATA SSDs and 3.5-inch HDDs, but some are designed exclusively for 3.5-inch hard drives.

If you’re shopping for an M.2 SSD enclosure, make sure it can accommodate the specific M.2 SSD you want to turn into an external drive. SATA and NVMe M.2 SSDs share the same form factor, but they can feature different cutouts, or “notches,” on the part that goes into the M.2 slot.

Some SATA and NVMe M.2 drives use the B+M key layout—two notches. NVMe drives typically use the M key layout (one notch on the right), while some SATA M.2 models use the B key layout (one notch on the left). In general, M.2 external SSD enclosures support B+M and M key layouts, with most not supporting the B key layout. So if you’ve got a B key SATA SSD, be careful when choosing an enclosure.

Similarly, M.2 SSDs come in four common lengths: 2280 (the most popular), 2260, 2242, and 2230 (the most compact, usually found in handheld PCs and some thin-and-light laptops). If you’ve got a 2280 SSD, you should be fine since every M.2 enclosure supports that form factor. But if you’ve got a shorter SSD, make sure the enclosure you’re considering supports it before pulling the trigger.

img_59814cc98a4fe


What Is the M.2 Expansion Slot, and How Can I Use It?

There’s a new open format sweeping the world of performance PCs, and it’s.

Don’t overspend on the enclosure

And vice-versa

A person's hand holding a Sabrent external SSD drive in front of a Linux laptop. Credit: Jordan Gloor / How-To Geek

M.2 external SSD enclosures come in various price tiers, depending on their maximum speed and other features. The most affordable ones top out at 5Gbps or 10Gbps, while you’ve also got USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 models with a maximum bandwidth of 20Gbps, as well as Thunderbolt and USB4 enclosures that can deliver up to 40Gbps. If you don’t own a USB4 or Thunderbolt device and plan to reuse an older PCIe 3 SSD or an M.2 SATA SSD, there’s no need to shell out extra cash for a pricier enclosure.

Similarly, purchase a USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 enclosure only if you own a device with USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 ports. I made the mistake of buying a USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 enclosure, shown below, because I’d thought I’d get 20Gbps bandwidth on my Mac Mini, which comes with Thunderbolt ports, and 10Gbps when using it with my desktop PC and handhelds. But the reality is that USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 works at 20Gbps only when connected to a matching USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 port. When plugged into a Thunderbolt or USB4 port, its maximum bandwidth drops to just 10Gbps. As you might’ve guessed, I discovered this the hard way; don’t repeat my mistake.

A DIY External SSD based on a Samsung 980 Pro lying on top of a desk. Credit: Goran Damnjanovic / How-To Geek

The same applies to SSDs. If you want to buy an SSD to turn into a DIY external drive, go for an affordable model because, at best, you’ll get 40Gbps bandwidth, which even the cheapest PCIe 4 SSDs can deliver. If you plan to get a 10Gbps or slower enclosure, feel free to pick the cheapest SSD you can find. Just make sure it’s a reliable model and not some AliExpress-type scam.

You shouldn’t use just any USB cable with your DIY SSD

You could be stuck at USB 2.0 speeds

A pile of usb cables on a wood surface Credit: Hannah Stryker / How-To Geek

Cables bundled with SSD enclosures can usually match the enclosure’s maximum speed, so you should be fine using the included cable. But if you want to use your own, make sure it’s fast enough.

The catch is that most USB cables, even USB-C ones, top out at USB 2.0 speeds since they’re made for fast-charging, not speedy data transfer. Grabbing the closest USB cable you have and plugging it into the enclosure will likely result in maximum bandwidth of only a few dozen megabytes per second.

Another tidbit most people building their first DIY external SSD aren’t aware of is that many cheap SSD enclosures (especially 2.5-inch SATA models) come with USB 3.0 Micro-B ports and cables, which are fast enough but far from common. If you want to use your own USB cables with the enclosure, get one that features either a USB-A or USB-C port.

A hand holding the Crucial X10 portable SSD with a weeping willow tree in the background.


The hidden reason why your portable SSD is painfully slow

Please stop blaming your portable SSD for being painfully slow


After you build a DIY external SSD, don’t let it overheat

After you assemble your DIY SSD, keep it out in the open while transferring data. DIY external SSDs, especially NVMe drives, do heat up. Placing them on a blanket, your bed, or any other heat-insulating surface can drastically reduce their performance and even shorten their lifespan.

The best you can do is place them out in the open, on a surface with solid thermal dissipation properties. For instance, when I transfer large files on my external M.2 SSD, I place it on top of my aluminum Steam Deck dock, which helps it cool down. You can even use an active fan if you end up getting a Thunderbolt 4 or USB4 enclosure, which can drastically cool down the drive and even improve its maximum transfer speeds.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As I’m writing this, NVIDIA is the largest company in the world, with a market cap exceeding $4 trillion. Team Green is now the leader among the Magnificent Seven of the tech world, having surpassed them all in just a few short years.

The company has managed to reach these incredible heights with smart planning and by making the right moves for decades, the latest being the decision to sell shovels during the AI gold rush. Considering the current hardware landscape, there’s simply no reason for NVIDIA to rush a new gaming GPU generation for at least a few years. Here’s why.

Scarcity has become the new normal

Not even Nvidia is powerful enough to overcome market constraints

Global memory shortages have been a reality since late 2025, and they aren’t just affecting RAM and storage manufacturers. Rather, this impacts every company making any product that contains memory or storage—including graphics cards.

Since NVIDIA sells GPU and memory bundles to its partners, which they then solder onto PCBs and add cooling to create full-blown graphics cards, this means that NVIDIA doesn’t just have to battle other tech giants to secure a chunk of TSMC’s limited production capacity to produce its GPU chips. It also has to procure massive amounts of GPU memory, which has never been harder or more expensive to obtain.

While a company as large as NVIDIA certainly has long-term contracts that guarantee stable memory prices, those contracts aren’t going to last forever. The company has likely had to sign new ones, considering the GPU price surge that began at the beginning of 2026, with gaming graphics cards still being overpriced.

With GPU memory costing more than ever, NVIDIA has little reason to rush a new gaming GPU generation, because its gaming earnings are just a drop in the bucket compared to its total earnings.

NVIDIA is an AI company now

Gaming GPUs are taking a back seat

A graph showing NVIDIA revenue breakdown in the last few years. Credit: appeconomyinsights.com

NVIDIA’s gaming division had been its golden goose for decades, but come 2022, the company’s data center and AI division’s revenue started to balloon dramatically. By the beginning of fiscal year 2023, data center and AI revenue had surpassed that of the gaming division.

In fiscal year 2026 (which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on June 30, 2026), NVIDIA’s gaming revenue has contributed less than 8% of the company’s total earnings so far. On the other hand, the data center division has made almost 90% of NVIDIA’s total revenue in fiscal year 2026. What I’m trying to say is that NVIDIA is no longer a gaming company—it’s all about AI now.

Considering that we’re in the middle of the biggest memory shortage in history, and that its AI GPUs rake in almost ten times the revenue of gaming GPUs, there’s little reason for NVIDIA to funnel exorbitantly priced memory toward gaming GPUs. It’s much more profitable to put every memory chip they can get their hands on into AI GPU racks and continue receiving mountains of cash by selling them to AI behemoths.

The RTX 50 Super GPUs might never get released

A sign of times to come

NVIDIA’s RTX 50 Super series was supposed to increase memory capacity of its most popular gaming GPUs. The 16GB RTX 5080 was to be superseded by a 24GB RTX 5080 Super; the same fate would await the 16GB RTX 5070 Ti, while the 18GB RTX 5070 Super was to replace its 12GB non-Super sibling. But according to recent reports, NVIDIA has put it on ice.

The RTX 50 Super launch had been slated for this year’s CES in January, but after missing the show, it now looks like NVIDIA has delayed the lineup indefinitely. According to a recent report, NVIDIA doesn’t plan to launch a single new gaming GPU in 2026. Worse still, the RTX 60 series, which had been expected to debut sometime in 2027, has also been delayed.

A report by The Information (via Tom’s Hardware) states that NVIDIA had finalized the design and specs of its RTX 50 Super refresh, but the RAM-pocalypse threw a wrench into the works, forcing the company to “deprioritize RTX 50 Super production.” In other words, it’s exactly what I said a few paragraphs ago: selling enterprise GPU racks to AI companies is far more lucrative than selling comparatively cheaper GPUs to gamers, especially now that memory prices have been skyrocketing.

Before putting the RTX 50 series on ice, NVIDIA had already slashed its gaming GPU supply by about a fifth and started prioritizing models with less VRAM, like the 8GB versions of the RTX 5060 and RTX 5060 Ti, so this news isn’t that surprising.

So when can we expect RTX 60 GPUs?

Late 2028-ish?

A GPU with a pile of money around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek

The good news is that the RTX 60 series is definitely in the pipeline, and we will see it sooner or later. The bad news is that its release date is up in the air, and it’s best not to even think about pricing. The word on the street around CES 2026 was that NVIDIA would release the RTX 60 series in mid-2027, give or take a few months. But as of this writing, it’s increasingly likely we won’t see RTX 60 GPUs until 2028.

If you’ve been following the discussion around memory shortages, this won’t be surprising. In late 2025, the prognosis was that we wouldn’t see the end of the RAM-pocalypse until 2027, maybe 2028. But a recent statement by SK Hynix chairman (the company is one of the world’s three largest memory manufacturers) warns that the global memory shortage may last well into 2030.

If that turns out to be true, and if the global AI data center boom doesn’t slow down in the next few years, I wouldn’t be surprised if NVIDIA delays the RTX 60 GPUs as long as possible. There’s a good chance we won’t see them until the second half of 2028, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they miss that window as well if memory supply doesn’t recover by then. Data center GPUs are simply too profitable for NVIDIA to reserve a meaningful portion of memory for gaming graphics cards as long as shortages persist.


At least current-gen gaming GPUs are still a great option for any PC gamer

If there is a silver lining here, it is that current-gen gaming GPUs (NVIDIA RTX 50 and AMD Radeon RX 90) are still more than powerful enough for any current AAA title. Considering that Sony is reportedly delaying the PlayStation 6 and that global PC shipments are projected to see a sharp, double-digit decline in 2026, game developers have little incentive to push requirements beyond what current hardware can handle.

DLSS 5, on the other hand, may be the future of gaming, but no one likes it, and it will take a few years (and likely the arrival of the RTX 60 lineup) for it to mature and become usable on anything that’s not a heckin’ RTX 5090.

If you’re open to buying used GPUs, even last-gen gaming graphics cards offer tons of performance and are able to rein in any AAA game you throw at them. While we likely won’t get a new gaming GPU from NVIDIA for at least a few years, at least the ones we’ve got are great today and will continue to chew through any game for the foreseeable future.



Source link