X-twitter Facebook-f Pinterest-p
X-twitter Facebook-f Pinterest-p

40 members of Congress take Apple Towson union’s side

Google’s first new smart speaker in six years might finally have a release date

I tried the latest MX Linux version on my PC, and it made the system look and feel like new

I tried gaming on Android Auto and found 4 apps that made car downtime less boring

New PC? This MX Linux version is the best distro for you

Returning People to Work Starts With Returning Them to Life – I Learned That as a Mother. Mental Health Recovery, Medical Privacy, How to Secure Mental Health Records

How to ask for Help When You Have High Functioning Social Anxiety?

Maple Grove Report

Ransomware Operators Keep Business Hours. The Data Proves It

Strengthening Governance With Automated HR Data

The WP Maps Pro Flaw That Lets Anyone Create a WordPress Admin Without a Password

Maple Grove Report Legal

Ransomware Operators Keep Business Hours. The Data Proves It

Strengthening Governance With Automated HR Data

The WP Maps Pro Flaw That Lets Anyone Create a WordPress Admin Without a Password

Maple Grove Report

I tried the latest MX Linux version on my PC, and it made the system look and feel like new

40 members of Congress take Apple Towson union’s side

I tried gaming on Android Auto and found 4 apps that made car downtime less boring

Google’s first new smart speaker in six years might finally have a release date

‘The Mandalorian and Grogu’ will be screened at WWDC 2026

4 newly-added Paramount+ movies to watch this week (June 1-7)

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

I tried the latest MX Linux version on my PC, and it made the system look and feel like new


MX Linux

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.

ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • MX Linux’s Xfce AHS is a Linux distro for modern hardware.
  • Whether it’s a desktop or laptop, MX Linux AHS should work out of the box.
  • MX Linux is free to download and install.

MX Linux is a dual adventure between the antiX and MX Linux communities and serves as a collection of open-source operating systems that are all built around the Debian Stable distribution. Because of its Debian base, MX Linux is a highly stable operating system that performs brilliantly on PCs of all types — from older systems to midrange and powerhouse computers.

There are five different versions of MX Linux: 

  • MX-25.2_Xfce_x66 – The standard release that is based on Debian 6.12 with hardware support from Debian Stable and is suitable for PCs that are a few years old.
  • MX-25.2_KDE_x64 – Based on the 6.12 kernel with the Advanced Hardware Support repositories enabled and defaults to the KDE Plasma desktop environment.
  • MX-25.2_fluxbox_x64 – Same as the KDE version above, only it ships with a custom fluxbox desktop.
  • MX-25.2_rpi_respin – A respin of the Raspberry Pi OS with an MX Linux setup, and is suitable for Pi4, Pi400, and Pi5 hardware.

There’s also a version, MX-25.2_Xfce_ahs_x64, which includes the 7.07 kernel and includes new graphics drivers and firmware. This version of MX Linux is ideal for newer systems that are 1-3 years old. 

Also: CachyOS vs. MX Linux: Are you seeking speed or stability in your distro?

The MX-25.2_Xfce_ahs_x64 version ships with a Liquorix kernel that is tuned for high-performance audio and video, which makes it an outstanding option for gaming. You also get DKMS packages to ensure that modern GPUs and Wi-Fi chips work out of the box. The combination of the kernel and Mesa stack offers HiDPI scaling via XFCE at 125% and 150%, while looking crisp, and you get the MX Nvidia installer to make it exponentially easier to install and get the proper GPU driver working flawlessly.

Thanks to the Xfce desktop, MX Linux XFCE-AHS runs with speed that’s on par (or superior) to any desktop OS on the planet. I’ve covered MX Linux several times here on ZDNET, and the OS has never ceased to impress me. It offers an old-school look and feel, but modern performance and ease.

I installed MX Linux XFCE-AHS as a virtual machine, and it did not fail to impress me out of the box. Keep in mind that I’ve never been a big fan of the Xfce desktop environment, but MX Linux gives it a slightly more modern look and feel, with a custom layout and a nicely laid-out Conky configuration that displays the time/date and RAM/CPU usage percentages. 

MX Linux.

The Xfce desktop environment on MX Linux AHS isn’t exactly modern, but it gets the job done.

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

You get plenty of preinstalled applications, such as Firefox, LibreOffice, Asunder CD Ripper, a handy Bash Config GUI, Catfish file search, a GUI for installing downloaded .deb packages, FeatherPad (text editor), Firewall Configuration (GUI for ufw), LuckyBackup, Thunderbird, all the MX Tools, and much more.

What makes this distro so special?

There are tons of Linux distributions vying for your attention, so what makes MX Linux AHS the one you should use?

Simply put, it’s all about new hardware. If you have a new PC and want to make sure it works with Linux without any tweaking, MX Linux AHS is what you want. If you’re worried about Wi-Fi, sound, or discrete graphics (stand-alone graphics processors that function separately from the CPU) working properly, the combination of the Liquorix kernel, the latest MESA release, and the addition of DKMS (Dynamic Kernel Module Support), you can bet that newer hardware will work out of the box. 

Also: How much RAM does your Linux PC actually need in 2026? An expert’s sweet spot

And with the Xfce desktop environment, newer hardware is going to perform exponentially better than you expect. Running with just 4GB of RAM and 2 CPUs, MX Linux AHS ran like an absolute demon as a virtual machine.

MX Linux isn’t limited to working on modern desktops. If you own a modern laptop, MX Linux 25.2 AHS was built specifically for you.

Also keep in mind that the Liquorix 7.0.9-2 Liquorix kernel (the 7.07 kernel was immediately updated after the OS was installed) is a low-latency kernel, which means it has been designed to decrease the time it takes to respond to various events, such as audio, gaming, and industrial automation.

If you’re a gamer or audio designer and are using hardware that is 1-3 years old, MX Linux AHS might be the best distribution for you. Yes, you have to deal with a slightly less-than-modern desktop UI, but the speed you gain from using Xfce is worth feeling a bit out of date on the user interface side of things.

If you wanted to, you could always install a newer desktop environment, such as KDE Plasma or COSMIC. For kicks, I installed KDE Plasma desktop with:

sudo apt-get install kde-plasma-desktop -y

I wanted to see how the KDE Plasma desktop would perform on top of the MX Linux AHS release. It took roughly a minute for the installation to complete. After a restart, I logged into KDE Plasma (Wayland version) and found it performed as well as Xfce (and even had the nice Conky on the desktop). 

Also: I customized an Arch-based distro my way in under 5 minutes – and it’s glorious

If you’ve been reading my work long enough, you know that I prefer a modern desktop over one that looks like it was designed in the early 2000s. It’s nothing against Xfce; I just want something more up to date. 

MX Linux.

Now we’re cooking with gas.

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

The only thing missing from my KDE Plasma installation was the usual collection of KDE Plasma apps (such as Discover and Konsole). I was able to solve that with:

sudo apt-get install kde-full -y

Beyond the performance, I was happy to see that KDE Plasma ran flawlessly, so if you want the hardware support and low latency of MX Linux AHS, but would prefer a more elegant desktop, install this OS and then install KDE Plasma on top of it. 

Who is MX Linux AHS for?

This question is simple: If you have a modern PC or laptop and you want an OS that’ll work right out of the box, MX Linux AHS should tick all the boxes. The only nit I could pick is that the OS didn’t ship with Steam preinstalled. That’s fine, as you can always install it via the command line like so:

sudo apt-get install steam-installer steam-devices -y

MX Linux AHS is a great option for anyone with modern hardware. Between the 7.09 Liquorix kernel, DKMS, and the updated Mesa stack, your hardware is most likely supported, and if you decide to install a more modern DE, you’ll wind up with an elegant, powerful, and modern PC or laptop.





Source link

I tried the latest MX Linux version on my PC, and it made the system look and feel like new

40 members of Congress take Apple Towson union’s side

I tried gaming on Android Auto and found 4 apps that made car downtime less boring

I tried the latest MX Linux version on my PC, and it made the system look and feel like new

I tried the latest MX Linux version on my PC, and it made the system look and feel like new

40 members of Congress take Apple Towson union’s side

I tried gaming on Android Auto and found 4 apps that made car downtime less boring

Sony’s MiniDisc was better than the CD, but one fatal flaw ruined it


It’s no exaggeration to say that the Compact Disc (CD) dominated the ’90s. It’s really a technology of the ’80s, but the ’90s is when the format peaked, and when its most likely threat arose, and failed.

Sony and Philips co-developed the CD standard, which makes it ironic that it was Sony’s MiniDisc which aimed straight for CD’s crown. In many ways it was the superior format, but as history has shown time and time again, being better on paper does not guarantee success.

Too soon and too late at the same time

When Sony launched MiniDisc in 1992, the average person’s experience with digital media was mostly read-only. Even though we all could listen to pristine digital music, if you wanted to make your own recording you had one option, and that option was cassette tapes.

MiniDisc combines the optical technology of CDs with the magnetic technology of tapes, floppies, hard drives, and other magnetic storage devices. It’s “magneto-optical.”

A MiniDisc can be rewritten thousands of times without degrading like a tape. You could record digital music, erase it, rename songs, make playlists, and keep using the same disc for a long time.

Today, with our fully digital music player software on phones and computers, this sounds absolutely pedestrian. In the early ’90s, this was basically science fiction come to life. Remember that CD-RW technology would only appear towards the end of the decade, so there was literally nothing else like it.

MiniDisc, as the name suggests, was also designed from the start to be a portable format. Sony has pioneered the DiscMan and portable CD players as a whole, but the size of the discs meant there was a limit on how compact they could be. The little floppy-sized MiniDiscs meant much smaller players were possible. MiniDiscs stay inside a plastic caddy, making them much more durable too.

Quiz
8 Questions · Test Your Knowledge

The wild world of pre-cloud data storage
Trivia challenge

Before the cloud, we had spinning disks and prayer — see how much you remember about the glory days of physical storage.

Floppy DisksOptical MediaTape DrivesCapacityHistory

The iconic 3.5-inch floppy disk that dominated the ’90s had a maximum storage capacity of how much?

Correct! The standard 3.5-inch high-density floppy held 1.44 MB — barely enough for a handful of Word documents by modern standards. It’s wild to think entire operating systems were once distributed on stacks of these little guys.

Not quite! The correct answer is 1.44 MB. While 2.88 MB ‘extended density’ floppies did exist, they were rare and barely caught on — 1.44 MB was the reigning champion of the floppy era.

Which company invented the floppy disk in the late 1960s?

That’s right — IBM invented the floppy disk, with the first 8-inch version arriving around 1971. The project was led by David Noble, and the goal was simply to load microcode into the IBM System/370 mainframe. Nobody predicted it would reshape personal computing.

Close guess, but it was IBM! The floppy disk was born from a very unglamorous need: getting microcode into mainframes. IBM engineer David Noble led the effort, and the resulting 8-inch disk quietly launched a storage revolution.

What does ‘CD-R’ stand for, and what makes it different from a regular CD?

Nailed it! CD-R stands for Compact Disc – Recordable, and once you burned data onto it, that data was there forever — or until you left it face-down on a desk for a week. The ‘burning’ process literally used a laser to make permanent marks in a dye layer.

Not quite! CD-R stands for Compact Disc – Recordable. The key word is ‘once’ — you could write to it, but never erase or change it. That’s what separated it from the CD-RW (Rewritable), which let you wipe and reuse the disc.

Magnetic tape storage is considered ancient history, but it’s still widely used today for what purpose?

You got it! Magnetic tape never died — it just moved to the basement. Huge organizations like banks, studios, and cloud providers still use tape for cold storage because it’s incredibly cheap per gigabyte and can last decades. Modern tape cartridges can hold tens of terabytes each.

Surprisingly, tape is still very much alive! The correct answer is enterprise backup and archiving. While it sounds prehistoric, modern tape cartridges hold tens of terabytes and cost pennies per gigabyte compared to hard drives, making them a go-to for cold storage in 2024.

The original 8-inch floppy disk shrank to 5.25 inches, then to 3.5 inches. What was the defining physical feature of the 3.5-inch design that made it more durable?

Double win! The 3.5-inch floppy had both a rigid hard plastic shell AND a sliding metal shutter that covered the read/write slot when the disk wasn’t in use. This made it far tougher than the floppy 5.25-inch version, which you could literally bend — and ruin — with your bare hands.

Almost! The answer is actually both B and C. The 3.5-inch floppy’s genius was combining a rigid plastic shell with a sliding metal shutter over the data slot. The 5.25-inch predecessor had a flexible sleeve and an always-exposed slot, making it easy to accidentally destroy.

When burning a music CD in the late ’90s and early 2000s, what was the dreaded consequence of a ‘buffer underrun’ error?

Correct, and painful! A buffer underrun happened when your PC couldn’t feed data to the CD burner fast enough, causing the laser to stop mid-burn. Since the disc was already partially written, it became a shiny, expensive coaster. This is why people would nervously avoid touching their computer during a burn.

Oh, if only it had just slowed down! The correct answer is that the disc was permanently ruined. A buffer underrun broke the continuous writing process, leaving the disc in a half-written, unreadable limbo with no recovery option. Losing a blank CD-R was a real sting back when they weren’t exactly cheap.

The Iomega Zip disk was a popular storage solution in the mid-to-late ’90s. What was the capacity of the original Zip disk?

Exactly right — 100 MB! At a time when floppy disks maxed out at 1.44 MB, the Zip disk felt almost sci-fi. Graphic designers and digital photographers loved them. Later versions bumped up to 250 MB and even 750 MB, but the original 100 MB model was the one that made everyone’s jaw drop.

The original Zip disk held 100 MB — a staggering amount compared to the 1.44 MB floppy it was meant to replace. Iomega later released 250 MB and 750 MB versions, but the 100 MB original is the one that defined the brand and earned it a cult following in the late ’90s.

The ‘Click of Death’ was a notorious failure symptom associated with which storage device?

Spot on! The Iomega Zip drive became infamous for its ‘Click of Death’ — a rhythmic clicking sound that signaled imminent drive or disk failure. Worse, an infected drive could corrupt every disk inserted into it, spreading the problem. It became one of the most dreaded sounds in ’90s computing.

The culprit was the Iomega Zip drive! Its ‘Click of Death’ was a repetitive clicking sound that meant the drive head was failing — and it could corrupt every disk you inserted afterward, spreading data loss like a disease. It’s still considered one of the most notorious hardware failures of the personal computing era.

Challenge Complete

Your Score

/ 8

Thanks for playing!

MiniDisc fixed many of the problems people hated about CDs and tapes

The best of both worlds

A man pointing his finger at the CD button of an in-car CD player as a disc is being inserted. Credit: Mdisk / Shutterstock

All of these features addressed the list of issues people had with CDs. It combined the best parts of CDs and cassette tapes without the drawbacks of either. Tapes were recordable and portable, but wore out and sounded awful compared to CDs.

CDs had better audio quality (we’ll get to that), but they were also relatively fragile, too big to be properly portable, and up to that point very prone to skipping in portable form. In the ’90s, portable CD players solved the problem by putting big, expensive RAM buffers into the system to absorb the bumps. In 1992, this wasn’t really a thing yet. So MiniDisc was the ultimate in portable music quality and convenience.

Musicians and people who had to make field recordings came to love MiniDisc. You could record high quality audio outside of a studio, pretty much anywhere. Up to that point, you had to use tape, and even the best portable tape solutions had quality limits. It found a place for recording live performances, interviews, lectures, and other similar events.

Philips Portable CD Player Bluetooth with Cassette

Bluetooth Connectivity?

Yes

Brand

Philips

The Philips Portable CD Player Boombox takes the company’s years of experience with the boombox format and adds plenty of modern connectivity and features. Playback from CD, cassette, USB, or Bluetooth, all while kicking back and controlling everything with the included remote.


Sony’s compression technology was both the secret weapon and the fatal flaw

Audiophiles strike again

Portable MiniDisc player with a disc inserted, surrounded by wired headphones on a blue background. Credit: SOLDATOOFF/Shutterstock.com

So what about listening to music at home? Home MiniDisc players did exist, and it was a viable home music format. In fact, it’s convenient to take the music from your portable player and putting into your MinDisc deck. If your existing CD player or Hi-Fi receiver had a line-in jack, you could just hook up your portable player, of course.

But, listening to music at home on a proper Hi-Fi exposed the flaws in the format. Sony relied on a proprietary compression system called ATRAC (Adaptive Transform Acoustic Coding). It was the only way to fit that much music on a disc that small. This offered near-CD quality, but that’s not CD quality.

Early revisions of ATRAC were more obviously lossy to the human ear, and even though the algorithm improved over the years, MiniDisc’s reputation as the “compressed” option stuck. It also didn’t help that MiniDisc was a more closed ecosystem than CD. This is a pattern we’d see Sony repeat later with its proprietary memory cards for cameras, and the expensive format it developed for the PlayStation Vita.

MP3 players, cheap CD-Rs, and flash storage killed it almost overnight

It’s ironic that the perception of compressed audio was a sticking point for some people, because the 128Kbps or worse MP3s that everyone was sharing and listening to in the latter half of the ’90s and 2000s sounded obviously worse than CDs and MiniDisc.

It turns out that audio quality means much less to the general music-listening public than low cost and convenience. Today we can have it all, but maybe if Sony had played things a little less close to its chest, we’d all be using MiniDiscs in 2026 and beyond.



Source link

Sony WH-1000XX headphones spotted in the wild ahead of its official launch

You can play Angry Birds on Android Auto, plus 4 more popular games – here’s how

Small Digital Security Changes That Reduce Your Personal Cyber Risks

Recent Reviews

Google Revamps Bug Bounty Programs: Android Rewards Rise, Chrome Payouts Drop in the Age of AI

Security Affairs newsletter Round 575 by Pierluigi Paganini – INTERNATIONAL EDITION

U.S. CISA adds a flaw in WebPros cPanel to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog

Copyright © 2024 All Rights Reserved.