Here’s why microSD cards disappeared from high-end phones


MicroSD card slots were once ubiquitous on Android phones. Now they’ve all but disappeared—at least from the more premium models. Why are the best phones seemingly making us do with less?

Internal storage offers better performance

Why settle for slow speeds?

A microSD card next to the microSD card slot of a Fairphone (Gen 6). Credit: Bertel King / How-To Geek

On paper, internal storage and expandable storage seem quite similar. 128GB of internal memory and a 128GB memory card equate to the same amount of storage (disregarding the space reserved for apps), but that isn’t the full story.

Internal memory offers faster transfer speeds. If you’re copying files from one location to another, it tends to happen more quickly on internal than external storage. This can place limits on how well an app can run when saved to an external card. Newer versions of Android have even stopped allowing you to move apps to external storage altogether. With microSD cards coming in various speed classes, developers can’t assume users have a microSD with fast transfer speeds.

This is similar to one reason many Switch game developers opt to release their games as digital-only downloads. It’s not just a question of whether a game can fit on an external cartridge, but how much faster the internal drive can load assets than the flash storage in Nintendo’s cartridges can.

MicroSD cards aren’t secure

Easy to steal, easy to read

When a phone gets lost or stolen, it’s easy to protect the files within from most would-be thieves. Accessing the drive requires disassembling the device, which may render the phone unsellable. This makes the data something you can protect with a strong PIN or a fingerprint. You can choose to wipe the phone remotely if you fear all is lost.

MicroSD cards are easy to insert into your phone, and they’re just as easy to remove. If you’re using the card as it came from the store, then your files are likely accessible without having to bypass any type of security. Someone could simply take the card out of your phone and put it into their PC to gain access to all of your photos. That’s a risk many of us understand how to defend ourselves from, if only by being selective which files go into the card, but it’s a vulnerability far more people don’t really understand how to navigate.

Murena Fairphone 6

Display

6.31 inch P-OLED LTPO

RAM

8GB

Storage

256GB

Battery

4415 mAh

Operating System

Android 15

Dimensions

156.5× 73.3× 9.6mm

Powered by /e/OS operating system, the Murena Fairphone (Gen. 6) offers an ultra-repairable design and supports microSD storage expansion.


Phones now come with enough internal storage

Well, some of them, at least

A 256GB microSD card sitting on a person's thumb nail. Credit: Patrick Campanale / How-To Geek

Expandable memory was once a necessity if you wanted access to as many files as you could store on a PC, since phones came with very little internal memory. There were years when the starting amount of storage for phones was 16GB. That was easy to fill up with podcasts alone. Buying the biggest microSD card you could was a no brainer.

Times have changed. While the base Google Pixel 10 may still come with 128GB, the iPhone 17 now starts at 256GB. A growing number of phones start with 512GB. Those with the desire and the funds can max out many high-end phones with 2TB of internal storage. These are amounts that can take years to fill up with photos and family videos. It’s increasingly rare to find yourself needing to uninstall apps in order to free up space.

Does this offer phone manufacturers a way to up-charge you for a phone with more storage? Absolutely. Thing is, that was also a practice even when most phones came with microSD card slots. Some of us will pay more for a 512GB phone regardless of whether we plan to stick a memory card in it some day.

Faster internet gave us cloud storage

And everybody wants to sell you a cloud subscription

AI editing button in Google Photos on the Google Pixel 8 Pro Credit: Justin Duino / How-To Geek

If your phone does run out of storage, instead of offloading data onto an external drive, most of us now upload those files to the internet instead. Apple and Google both offer cloud storage accounts during the process of setting up your phone. I personally opt to back up and sync the files on my phone to an external drive that I own, but I’m in the vast minority.

Cloud storage requires faster internet to be viable, and those speeds are available for most people, whether accesing the internet at home or via a cellular connection. You don’t need to copy over all the files from your PC (if you even have a separate PC) when you can just access those files from the web instead.

Cloud storage is an even larger source of revenue than selling phones with larger drives. Signing up for cloud storage involves committing to a monthly or annual payment, which is a business model all its own.


MicroSD disappeared from phones for a reason, but we still want it back

I get it. For many of us, having the option to use a microSD card is better than not. The SIM tray on my Galaxy Z Fold 6 has a spot where the microSD card would go, if only Samsung included the necessary bits, and I would gladly stick a memory card there. But it’s also the case that phones are a bit easier to understand and secure without fiddling with microSD cards.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


YouTube has an AI slop problem, and its crackdown is catching legitimate creators in the crossfire. Faceless channels, where no human host ever appears on screen, have existed for years and are not inherently AI-generated.

Many are run by solo creators who simply prefer to stay anonymous. The problem is that AI tools made it easy to flood the platform with low-effort faceless content at scale, and YouTube’s algorithm is now penalizing the format as a whole.

How bad is the AI slop problem on YouTube?

A Kapwing study found that roughly 21% of the first 500 videos recommended to a new YouTube account were classified as AI slop, while 33% fell into a broader brainrot category. The problem extends to children, too, as more than 40% of YouTube Shorts recommended to kids in a 15-minute session contained low-quality AI content.

YouTube’s response has been to tweak its algorithm to favor videos with real human faces on camera, which is hitting faceless creators even when their content is entirely human-made.

How is YouTube tackling its AI slop problem?

YouTube is now testing a new pop-up on mobile that asks viewers to rate whether a video feels like AI slop, on a scale from “not at all” to “extremely.” The idea sounds reasonable, but crowdsourcing AI detection has real problems. People are bad at spotting AI content, and they are getting worse at it as AI capabilities continue to improve.

There are also legitimate concerns that YouTube could use this viewer feedback as training data for its own AI models, potentially making future AI-generated content even harder to spot.

🚨 Did you just see what YouTube did?

YouTube isn’t banning AI slop.. They’re making you label it so they can train their next model to not look like slop.

Read that again…

You flag the bad AI content. YouTube collects it. Google feeds it into Veo 4… Then next year their… https://t.co/8UC2J3mjjv pic.twitter.com/mIrTChqC1b

— Tuki (@TukiFromKL) March 17, 2026

Meanwhile, faceless creators are scrambling to adapt. According to The Hollywood Reporter, some are hiring cheap on-camera hosts through platforms like Fiverr and Upwork. Others are doubling down on niche educational content, which has held up better than broad content farms.

The AI text-to-video space is still valued at enormous sums, with Higgsfield AI alone sitting at $1 billion, but on YouTube, the math for faceless creators is getting harder to work out every month.



Source link