Why I’m using wired Android Auto when all the cool kids are switching to wireless


Android Auto

Kerry Wan/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Using a wired Android Auto setup greatly reduces latency issues.
  • Other benefits include better audio streaming quality and less overheating.
  • There are useful accessories that can resolve traditional wiring issues.

I’ve been using Android Auto since I bought my first car a few years ago, and while I’ve raved about the luxury of wireless connectivity, I recently had a change of heart.

While a wireless setup, whether through an adapter or your car’s native receiver, makes pairing your Android phone with your vehicle less of a burden, the technology’s caveats have become increasingly apparent — especially during the summer. 

Also: I tried Google Maps’ new 3D Immersive View for Android Auto, and it fixed my biggest navigation problems

One pitfall is the consistently noticeable battery drain, with my Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 often losing about 10% of its power during a one-way commute. Hot temperatures and always-on navigation will do that, so I’m not too surprised. Then there are the occasional hiccups and stutters, whether it’s Gemini cutting itself off mid-answer or Spotify being spotty.

Does switching to a wired setup remedy any of this? Mostly, and definitely much better than a wireless one, as I’ve noticed a few weeks into the shift. At this point, I may keep things the way they are for the foreseeable future, even if it feels like I’m traveling back in time.

The benefits go beyond stability

As with home networking, the reliability of a wired setup for Android Auto will always be superior to that of a wireless one. This is especially true if you’re on an older vehicle or own an older Android phone, and the way the two communicate wirelessly may not always be optimal. 

The connection typically involves a combination of Wi-Fi, Wi-Fi Direct, and Bluetooth, so there’s bound to be disruptions during rides. Even with my modern phone and car (a 2023 CX-5), I still experience the occasional connection drop when I hit a bump or drive through an underpass, so switching to a tethered setup has made a big difference.

Also: I use Android Auto in my living room now – and it solves one of my biggest productivity problems

For music lovers, streaming audio via a cable (or any wired setup, generally speaking) is best practice for the highest fidelity. That applies to the car, too, as many users, including myself, have found the playback quality to be much better through a wired connection versus a wireless one. I’m talking more engulfing bass and clearer mids and highs, and that’s without touching any of my vehicle’s or phone’s equalizer settings.

Android Auto

Kerry Wan/ZDNET

How noticeable this phenomenon is ultimately depends on the quality of your car’s built-in speaker system and sound deadening, as well as your ear for audio levels. But in my experience, I’ve enjoyed music on both Spotify and Apple Music without any wireless interference. House music generally sounds deeper; vocals are more distinct, everything is just better.

Your phone’s battery will thank you later

I mentioned earlier that my phone’s battery had been taking a beating throughout the summer, so much so that I found myself lugging around a portable charger whenever I expected to be outside for most of the day. While one solution is to set my phone on a wireless charging pad or a magnetic mount when it’s running Android Auto, the passive trickle charging from wired charging is much better for its longevity.

Also: 3 Android Auto automations that make my drives much easier – and how I set them up

That’s because the wireless charging coils in your phone generate more heat than when you’re charging it wired, and the higher temperatures can degrade the battery more quickly. While this may seem insignificant if you often switch phones, you’ll likely notice your battery life getting shorter over time.

To further prolong my phone’s battery health, I enable battery protection features that limit charging to 80%. This option is available on most Android models, including Samsung and Google devices.

Advice before you go

The USB cable you use for a wired Android Auto setup is just as important as the phone being connected. Notably, you’ll want to find a USB cable that supports data transferring and syncing. Most brands will clearly state this in their product listings. I generally prefer cables made of nylon, as they’re less susceptible to breaking when tucked in your center console.

If you’re afraid that a wired setup will wear out or damage your phone’s USB port, I’d recommend a magnetic USB adapter, which still lets you passively charge your phone when it’s paired with your car and greatly reduces the likelihood of damaging its port.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


TL;DR

India debates sovereign AI after the US forced Anthropic to kill Fable 5, with proposals for a $5B fund and calls to embrace open-source models.

When the US government ordered Anthropic to shut down Fable 5 and Mythos 5 on 12 June, the export control directive was aimed at restricting foreign nationals from accessing America’s most capable AI. In India, Anthropic’s second-largest market, it landed as a warning shot about what happens when your AI infrastructure runs on someone else’s politics.

The suspension cut off Indian developers and enterprises from Claude’s most advanced models overnight. India’s Claude run-rate revenue had doubled since October 2025, and Tata Consultancy Services had announced a partnership just one day earlier, on 11 June, to train 50,000 employees on Claude and build a dedicated Anthropic business unit. That deal is now in limbo.

The timing has turned what was already a simmering debate about AI sovereignty into a full strategic reckoning. Proposals that sounded ambitious a week ago now sound urgent.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Mohandas Pai, former Infosys CFO and one of India’s most prominent tech investors, has called for a ₹50,000 crore (roughly $5 billion) annual sovereign AI fund. He has also proposed a ₹2 lakh crore (approximately $21 billion) credit guarantee to finance cloud infrastructure, hardware procurement, and semiconductor development. The figures dwarf the government’s existing commitment.

India approved its IndiaAI Mission in March 2024 with a budget of ₹10,372 crore, approximately $1.25 billion. The programme has deployed around 38,000 GPUs so far. Pai’s proposal would quadruple annual spending and add a credit backstop an order of magnitude larger.

Sridhar Vembu, the founder of Zoho, has gone further. He argued that India should embrace smaller and open-source models, including Chinese ones, rather than depend on American frontier systems that can be switched off by executive order. “Technology is the ultimate weapon,” Vembu said. “Globalization is dead and Bharat must find her own way ahead.

The argument has teeth because the suspension demonstrated exactly the vulnerability Vembu is describing. Amazon’s CEO reportedly triggered the government crackdown by telling Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that researchers had used Fable 5 to obtain information that could be used in cyberattacks. Anthropic called the action disproportionate, but compliance was immediate and global.

Policy expert Prasanto Roy put it bluntly: “American AI models are bound to American geopolitics.” For Indian enterprises that had built workflows around Claude, the lesson was that access to frontier AI is a privilege that can be revoked without notice, without consultation, and without regard for the commercial relationships it disrupts.

The Indian startup ecosystem is already adapting. Sarvam, a Bengaluru-based AI company, released 30-billion and 105-billion parameter open-source models at the India AI Impact Summit in 2026. Krutrim, founded by Ola’s Bhavish Aggarwal, has pivoted from building foundational models to providing cloud and AI infrastructure services, reporting ₹3 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2026.

Neither company is close to matching the capabilities of Fable 5 or Mythos 5. But the argument for sovereign AI was never about matching frontier performance immediately. It is about ensuring that the floor does not fall out when Washington makes a unilateral decision about who gets to use which models.

Aakrit Vaish, founder of the AI startup Activate, said the suspension “completely changes things” for the sovereign AI debate. Vijay Rayapati, CEO of Atomicwork, raised concerns about what the precedent means for Indian companies with multi-country teams that depend on American AI providers. If the US can shut off model access to enforce export controls, any country that relies on American AI is one policy decision away from disruption.

Not everyone agrees that India needs to build its own frontier models. Hemant Mohapatra, a partner at Lightspeed Venture Partners, argued that talent and compute access matter more than capital for building competitive AI. India has the engineering workforce, but the compute gap is significant, and closing it requires either massive domestic investment or continued access to foreign cloud infrastructure.

Anthropic opened a Bengaluru office as part of its India expansion, and the TCS partnership was designed to be a cornerstone of its enterprise strategy in the country. Whether those plans survive the suspension intact depends on how quickly Anthropic can restore access and whether Indian enterprises still trust a provider whose most capable models can vanish overnight.

The broader pattern is unmistakable. The US has spent four years tightening controls on AI technology, from chip export restrictions to model-level interventions. Each escalation pushes more countries toward the conclusion that dependence on American AI infrastructure carries political risk. India, with its 1.4 billion people and rapidly growing technology sector, is now asking whether it can afford that risk, and what it would cost to eliminate it.

The Opendoor layoffs in June 2026, which shut the company’s India office and affected roughly 250 employees, added another dimension. CEO Kaz Nejatian cited AI-native teams as the reason, suggesting that some US companies are using AI to reduce their reliance on Indian engineering talent at the same time that India is debating its reliance on American AI. The relationship is becoming less complementary and more competitive.

For now, the sovereign AI proposals remain proposals. Pai’s fund has no legislative vehicle, Vembu’s call for open-source adoption has no coordinated policy framework, and the IndiaAI Mission’s GPU deployment is still in early stages.

But the Anthropic suspension has done something that years of policy papers and conference speeches could not: it has given the sovereign AI movement a concrete, recent, and viscerally felt example of why dependence on foreign AI is a strategic liability. The debate is no longer theoretical.



Source link