The Pixel 11 may finally ditch Samsung’s modem for better battery life and connectivity


If you’ve ever watched your Pixel’s signal bars drop for no reason in a room where every other phone was fine, you already know Google has a modem problem. 

A new FCC filing suggests the company might finally be doing something about it (via Android Central).

Is Google finally giving up on Samsung’s modems?

The filing for the upcoming Pixel 11 Pro Fold suggests Google is swapping out Samsung’s Exynos modem for MediaTek’s M90. 

This aligns with earlier reports that the Tensor G6 chip will pair with MediaTek’s modem rather than Samsung’s. For those catching up, Google has leaned on Samsung for Tensor chip design and modem hardware since the Pixel 6, but that relationship has been fraying for a while. 

Tensor G5 reportedly already jumped ship to TSMC for manufacturing. The modem looks like the next domino to fall, and the Pixel 11 Pro Fold could be the phone that makes the break official.

What does MediaTek’s M90 actually bring to the table?

This isn’t just chip-swapping for the sake of it. Samsung’s modems have been a recurring headache for recent Pixels, with owners regularly reporting weak signal, dropped connections, and battery drain that other flagships don’t seem to experience. 

MediaTek’s M90 is built to fix exactly that. It supports 5G speeds up to 12 Gbps, satellite connectivity, dual-active 5G SIM support, along with AI-driven power management. Pair that with the Tensor G6’s rumored move to TSMC’s 2nm process, and you’re looking at a Pixel that lasts longer, heats up less, and offers better connectivity.

None of this is official yet. But between the leaks and now a regulatory filing, the pieces are lining up for the Pixel 11 lineup to fix the one flaw that’s followed Tensor phones for years.

The filing matters beyond the phone’s spec sheet. With modem performance now a flagship battleground, Google’s MediaTek partnership offers a quicker path to fixing Tensor’s biggest weakness than Apple’s multi-year C1 modem journey.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


YouTube has an AI slop problem, and its crackdown is catching legitimate creators in the crossfire. Faceless channels, where no human host ever appears on screen, have existed for years and are not inherently AI-generated.

Many are run by solo creators who simply prefer to stay anonymous. The problem is that AI tools made it easy to flood the platform with low-effort faceless content at scale, and YouTube’s algorithm is now penalizing the format as a whole.

How bad is the AI slop problem on YouTube?

A Kapwing study found that roughly 21% of the first 500 videos recommended to a new YouTube account were classified as AI slop, while 33% fell into a broader brainrot category. The problem extends to children, too, as more than 40% of YouTube Shorts recommended to kids in a 15-minute session contained low-quality AI content.

YouTube’s response has been to tweak its algorithm to favor videos with real human faces on camera, which is hitting faceless creators even when their content is entirely human-made.

How is YouTube tackling its AI slop problem?

YouTube is now testing a new pop-up on mobile that asks viewers to rate whether a video feels like AI slop, on a scale from “not at all” to “extremely.” The idea sounds reasonable, but crowdsourcing AI detection has real problems. People are bad at spotting AI content, and they are getting worse at it as AI capabilities continue to improve.

There are also legitimate concerns that YouTube could use this viewer feedback as training data for its own AI models, potentially making future AI-generated content even harder to spot.

🚨 Did you just see what YouTube did?

YouTube isn’t banning AI slop.. They’re making you label it so they can train their next model to not look like slop.

Read that again…

You flag the bad AI content. YouTube collects it. Google feeds it into Veo 4… Then next year their… https://t.co/8UC2J3mjjv pic.twitter.com/mIrTChqC1b

— Tuki (@TukiFromKL) March 17, 2026

Meanwhile, faceless creators are scrambling to adapt. According to The Hollywood Reporter, some are hiring cheap on-camera hosts through platforms like Fiverr and Upwork. Others are doubling down on niche educational content, which has held up better than broad content farms.

The AI text-to-video space is still valued at enormous sums, with Higgsfield AI alone sitting at $1 billion, but on YouTube, the math for faceless creators is getting harder to work out every month.



Source link