TCS bets on 8,900 AI deployment engineers to defend India’s IT services model


Tata Consultancy Services plans to build a team of up to 8,900 forward-deployed AI engineers and is looking for acquisition targets in AI and cybersecurity, chief executive K Krithivasan said.

The move is India’s largest IT firm answering the question that has hung over the sector since the arrival of agentic AI in enterprise stacks, which is whether the industry that sells engineering hours has anything left to sell.

Krithivasan said TCS aims to convert between 1% and 1.5% of its associate base into forward-deployed engineers. Against a headcount of 593,798 at the end of June, that works out at roughly 5,900 to 8,900 people.

The term is borrowed from the AI labs, where forward-deployed engineers sit inside the client’s business and make the model actually do something. Chief operating officer Aarthi Subramanian described them as specialists who are multi-skilled but deep in one particular area, which is a polite way of saying they are the people sent in when the pilot does not survive contact with production.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Krithivasan has framed the programme as evidence that AI creates jobs rather than destroys them. He did not say whether the engineers will be hired externally or retrained from within, and on a base of nearly 600,000 people, that distinction is the whole story.

TCS added 9,279 employees in the June quarter, its second consecutive quarter of headcount growth after a stretch of contraction. Net profit rose about 5% year on year to ₹13,349 crore, on revenue up 14% to ₹72,275 crore, with an operating margin of 24%.

“Q1 FY27 reflects continued growth momentum and the strength of our strategic positioning, despite geopolitical and macro-economic headwinds,” Krithivasan said alongside the results, which also carried a ₹12 interim dividend. Growth of 14% is not the profile of a company being hollowed out, though it is also not yet the quarter in which the theory gets tested.

The company reported an order book of $9.5bn for the quarter, including an AI-led transformation deal with the Swedish bearings maker SKF, and said its AI business is now running at a $2.6bn annualised revenue rate, per its own results statement. That last figure is the one investors will test, because it is the only line that distinguishes AI revenue from the rest.

The anxiety it is meant to answer is straightforward. India’s $315bn IT services industry sells effort, and clients who believe AI shortens projects will expect a share of the productivity gain to show up as a lower price.

Acquisitions are the second half of the answer. Krithivasan said TCS is scanning for targets in AI and cybersecurity, though the company named no candidates, gave no budget, and set no timeline.

TCS is not alone in trying to sit closer to the model layer. Anthropic’s $100m Claude Partner Network pulled Accenture, Deloitte, Cognizant and Infosys into its enterprise ecosystem in March, which tells you where the integrators think the margin is going to sit.

India, meanwhile, is trying to move up the stack in hardware as well as services, with CG Semi beginning commercial chip production at its $870m Gujarat plant this month. The services giants and the fabs are, for once, chasing the same customer.

What TCS has not disclosed is how the forward-deployed engineers will be priced. Consulting firms have historically billed by the hour, and an engineer whose job is to make a model replace hours is an awkward thing to put on a rate card.

The company will report again in October. By then the useful number will not be 8,900, but whether the $2.6bn AI run rate has grown faster than the business it is supposed to be cannibalising.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


YouTube has an AI slop problem, and its crackdown is catching legitimate creators in the crossfire. Faceless channels, where no human host ever appears on screen, have existed for years and are not inherently AI-generated.

Many are run by solo creators who simply prefer to stay anonymous. The problem is that AI tools made it easy to flood the platform with low-effort faceless content at scale, and YouTube’s algorithm is now penalizing the format as a whole.

How bad is the AI slop problem on YouTube?

A Kapwing study found that roughly 21% of the first 500 videos recommended to a new YouTube account were classified as AI slop, while 33% fell into a broader brainrot category. The problem extends to children, too, as more than 40% of YouTube Shorts recommended to kids in a 15-minute session contained low-quality AI content.

YouTube’s response has been to tweak its algorithm to favor videos with real human faces on camera, which is hitting faceless creators even when their content is entirely human-made.

How is YouTube tackling its AI slop problem?

YouTube is now testing a new pop-up on mobile that asks viewers to rate whether a video feels like AI slop, on a scale from “not at all” to “extremely.” The idea sounds reasonable, but crowdsourcing AI detection has real problems. People are bad at spotting AI content, and they are getting worse at it as AI capabilities continue to improve.

There are also legitimate concerns that YouTube could use this viewer feedback as training data for its own AI models, potentially making future AI-generated content even harder to spot.

🚨 Did you just see what YouTube did?

YouTube isn’t banning AI slop.. They’re making you label it so they can train their next model to not look like slop.

Read that again…

You flag the bad AI content. YouTube collects it. Google feeds it into Veo 4… Then next year their… https://t.co/8UC2J3mjjv pic.twitter.com/mIrTChqC1b

— Tuki (@TukiFromKL) March 17, 2026

Meanwhile, faceless creators are scrambling to adapt. According to The Hollywood Reporter, some are hiring cheap on-camera hosts through platforms like Fiverr and Upwork. Others are doubling down on niche educational content, which has held up better than broad content farms.

The AI text-to-video space is still valued at enormous sums, with Higgsfield AI alone sitting at $1 billion, but on YouTube, the math for faceless creators is getting harder to work out every month.



Source link