How can small businesses get paid faster?



This post is brought to you in paid partnership with QuickBooks

Maria owns a small landscaping business outside Austin. It’s Friday morning, payroll is due, one of her commercial mowers needs repairs, and three crews are wrapping up projects across town. The business is busy, but nearly $18,000 from completed jobs is still tied up in unpaid invoices.

None of her customers are refusing to pay. One works on a 45-day accounts payable cycle. Another says the check is “being processed.” A third simply hasn’t opened the invoice yet. The work is complete, but the cash hasn’t reached her bank account.

For many small businesses, that’s a familiar story. Winning customers is only half the battle. Turning completed work into available cash is what keeps the business running.

The payment experience plays a critical role in how quickly businesses get paid. Businesses that make it easier to send invoices, accept payments, and track incoming revenue often get paid sooner than those relying on paper checks or disconnected tools. Platforms like QuickBooks Payments are designed around exactly that workflow, helping businesses create invoices, offer multiple payment options, automate follow-ups, and keep payments connected to their accounting from start to finish.

Why payment speed matters

Large companies have options when cash flow slows. They may have access to revolving credit, finance teams, or cash reserves that help absorb delayed customer payments.

Most small businesses don’t have that safety net. They rely on incoming payments to cover payroll, suppliers, inventory, rent, and day-to-day operating expenses. Even a profitable business can feel financial pressure if invoices stay unpaid for weeks.

That’s why getting paid faster isn’t simply about convenience. It improves cash flow without requiring businesses to find more customers or increase prices. Every day removed from the payment cycle gives owners more flexibility to invest in equipment, hire employees, or simply operate with greater confidence.

QuickBooks Payments is built around that goal. Rather than treating payments as a separate step, it connects invoicing, payment collection, deposits, and bookkeeping into one workflow that helps businesses move from completed work to available cash with fewer delays.

What’s slowing payments down?

Late payments aren’t always caused by customers refusing to pay. More often, they’re the result of unnecessary friction.

Paper checks take time to arrive and clear. PDF invoices may require customers to download documents, log into a banking portal, or manually initiate a transfer. Unclear payment terms can create additional back-and-forth before an invoice is approved.

Business owners also have limited time. Following up on overdue invoices often competes with sales, customer support, scheduling, and dozens of other responsibilities.

Modern payment platforms are designed to remove many of these obstacles. Instead of asking customers to navigate several steps before completing a payment, QuickBooks Payments allows them to pay directly from an invoice using the payment method that’s most convenient for them. Reducing those extra steps makes it easier for customers to pay when they’re ready instead of putting it off until later.

Five ways to get paid faster

Improving payment speed doesn’t necessarily require a complete overhaul of business operations. Often, it’s about simplifying the journey from estimate to payment.

Set clear expectations before work begins

Payment conversations should happen before work starts, not after it’s finished.

Whether a business requests an upfront deposit, uses milestone billing for larger projects, or shortens payment terms from Net 30 to Net 15, setting expectations early helps reduce misunderstandings later.

For businesses already using QuickBooks, estimates can be converted into invoices without recreating customer information or payment details. That creates a smoother experience for both the business and the customer while keeping payment expectations consistent throughout the project.

Give customers multiple ways to pay

Convenience has a direct impact on payment speed. If customers have to print an invoice, write a check, or manually enter banking information, there’s a greater chance they’ll postpone payment until later.

QuickBooks Payments embeds payment options directly into invoices, allowing customers to pay using credit cards, debit cards, ACH bank payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay, PayPal, or Venmo. This flexibility lets customers use the payment method they’re already comfortable with, making transactions faster and more straightforward. The easier it is to pay, the less likely an invoice is to remain outstanding.

Automate payment reminders

Following up on overdue invoices is important, but it’s rarely anyone’s favorite task.

Automated reminders help businesses stay consistent without adding another administrative responsibility. Instead of relying on someone to remember every follow-up email, reminders can be scheduled before or after payment due dates, ensuring customers receive timely prompts.

Within QuickBooks, reminders become part of the invoicing workflow rather than another manual task. That saves time while helping businesses maintain a professional and consistent payment experience.

Reduce the time between payment and deposit

Receiving payment is only part of the process. Businesses also need access to those funds.

Depending on the payment provider, deposits can take several business days to appear in a bank account. For businesses managing payroll or purchasing inventory, that delay can affect everyday operations.

QuickBooks Payments offers next-day deposits for eligible payments, helping businesses gain faster access to incoming revenue. Shortening even one part of the payment cycle can make cash flow more predictable, particularly for businesses that closely monitor weekly operating expenses.

Keep payments and accounting connected

Many businesses still manage invoicing, payment processing, bookkeeping, and reconciliation across multiple platforms.

While that approach works, it also creates more manual work. Payments need to be matched with invoices, accounting records updated, and bank transactions reconciled before owners have an accurate picture of available cash.

QuickBooks Payments removes much of that duplication by connecting directly with QuickBooks. As customers pay invoices, payment information automatically updates accounting records, helping reduce manual data entry while giving business owners a more current view of cash flow and outstanding invoices.

Why an integrated payment platform makes a difference

Managing payments is just one piece of running a business. Owners also need to track which invoices remain unpaid, which payments have cleared, when deposits will arrive, and how all of that affects their financial position.

When invoicing, payments, and accounting happen in separate systems, every transaction creates additional work. Businesses spend valuable time switching between platforms, reconciling records, and checking whether the numbers actually match.

An integrated platform changes that experience. With QuickBooks Payments, businesses can create estimates, send invoices, accept payments, receive deposits, and automatically update their books from one connected ecosystem. Instead of piecing together information from multiple tools, owners can spend less time on administration and more time focusing on customers and growth.

Beyond saving time, this approach also gives businesses greater visibility into their cash flow, making it easier to make confident financial decisions throughout the month rather than waiting until reconciliation is complete.

Faster payments create room to grow

Maria didn’t need more customers. She already had the work. What she needed was a faster, simpler way to turn completed jobs into available cash.

Across industries, from contractors and consultants to retailers and professional service firms, this challenge is widely shared. The businesses with the healthiest cash flow aren’t always the ones generating the most revenue. Often, they’re the ones that have removed unnecessary friction from the payment process.

Clear payment terms, digital invoices, flexible payment options, automated reminders, faster deposits, and integrated accounting all contribute to getting paid sooner. By bringing those capabilities together in one workflow, QuickBooks Payments helps businesses spend less time chasing invoices and more time doing what they do best.

Sometimes, the smartest way to improve cash flow isn’t finding more work. It’s making it easier to get paid for the work that’s already been done.

This content is paid for by the brands indicated. Digital Trends works closely with advertisers to highlight their products and services to our readers. Although this article is informational and not opinionated, it reflects thorough fact-checking by our team to ensure accuracy. Our dedicated partnerships team, not external advertisers, crafts all branded content in-house. For more information on our approach to branded content, click here.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


TL;DR

Meta stripped NameTag facial recognition code from its AI app one day after WIRED exposed it on 50 million phones. Meta says no decision has been made.

Meta removed nearly all traces of an unreleased facial recognition system from its smart glasses companion app on Friday, one day after WIRED reported that the software had been quietly embedded in an app installed on more than 50 million phones. The feature, which Meta internally called NameTag, was designed to convert faces captured by the company’s Ray-Ban smart glasses into unique biometric signatures and compare them against a database stored on the user’s device. WIRED also found that faces the system failed to recognise were cropped, indexed, and stored locally for future processing.

Andy Stone, Meta’s vice president of communications, told WIRED on Monday that the feature is “purely exploratory,” adding that no final decision has been made on what to do with it. That characterisation sits uneasily with the evidence WIRED documented. The version of Meta AI published the day of WIRED’s Thursday report contained several code libraries explicitly named for face recognition, a process for running the NameTag recognition pipeline, and a “Person recognised” alert the app would have shown if someone were identified.

Friday’s release stripped all of it out, along with a folder where the app would have stored the cropped images and biometric signatures of unrecognised faces. Meta did not answer WIRED’s questions about why the code was removed or whether the changes were planned before the story was published. A few fragments remain in the latest version, including an internal debug menu label and a dormant link meant to open a recognised person’s profile, pointing to parts of the system that are no longer there.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The gap between Meta’s public statements and the code WIRED found is the central tension. Before the Thursday report, Stone dismissed the findings by writing that the company could not answer questions about how the system would work because “the feature does not exist.” Andrew Bosworth, Meta’s chief technology officer, called the reporting “incredibly misleading” and “absolutely dishonest.” Yet the code was functional enough to include three AI models, one to detect faces, another to crop them, and a third to encode them as biometric data, all embedded in the companion app for a product already at the centre of a mounting privacy crisis.

Meta declined to answer ten questions WIRED posed before publishing, including whether it had already created the database of face profiles NameTag uses, how long the app retains photographs and biometric data of unrecognised people, and whether that data would ever be sent back to Meta’s servers. The company also did not respond to questions about whether it was building NameTag for blind or low-vision users, or to criticism from privacy advocates who warned the system could let stalkers and abusers identify strangers in public.

NameTag first surfaced in February, when The New York Times, citing internal Meta documents, reported that the company was developing face recognition for its smart glasses and considering a launch as early as this year. One internal memo reportedly described releasing the feature during a “dynamic political environment” when privacy and civil liberties advocates would be distracted by other concerns. WIRED subsequently found that much of NameTag’s machinery had been built into the Meta AI app as early as January, months before any public acknowledgement, adding another layer to the company’s pattern of shipping first and disclosing later when it comes to its smart glasses.

Kade Crockford, director of the technology for liberty programme at the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, said the removal does not undo the original decision to ship the code and pointed to it as evidence that consumer privacy needs stronger legal protection than Congress has been willing to provide. The Massachusetts House of Representatives last week unanimously passed a consumer privacy bill that, if enacted as written, would impose strong enforcement provisions including a private right of action allowing aggrieved users to sue. “State lawmakers need to do their job and step up to protect consumer privacy,” Crockford said.

Meta’s sneaky tactics in slipping the face-recognition code into its smart glasses show exactly why data privacy bills need the teeth of strong enforcement,” Crockford added. “Companies like Meta prioritise their bottom line, so lawmakers need to speak in the only language its C-suite understands.” Whether a code removal prompted by investigative reporting constitutes a victory or merely a tactical retreat depends on what Meta does next, and on whether the regulatory pressure building on both sides of the Atlantic produces enforceable consequences before the feature quietly returns under a different name.



Source link