After Samsung and Apple, Oppo could be next to join the wide foldable club


Samsung is reportedly preparing to introduce a shorter and wider foldable, while Apple’s first-ever foldable iPhone is rumored to use a wide passport-like design as well. Now, a new leak suggests that Oppo may be planning a similar device, adding to the growing crowd of brands in this category.

The news arrives from known Chinese tipster, Digital Chat Station, who claims that Oppo is developing a wide-screen foldable that could arrive in the first quarter of 2027.

How its battery might be the biggest highlight

The unnamed foldable will reportedly run on Qualcomm’s unannounced Snapdragon 8 Gen 6, identified by the model number SM8950. The leak also points to a dedicated AI accelerator for handling demanding on-device models. But its standout specification could be a battery of approximately 6,500mAh.

That would be enormous for any foldable and would likely require silicon-carbon battery technology to prevent the handset from becoming unnecessarily thick. The source does not provide charging speeds, dimensions, camera specifications, or confirmed display sizes. In comparison, the Motorola Razr Fold had one of the biggest batteries on any foldable phone, and it maxed out at 6,000mAh.

This model might be called the Find N7, and just like the current Find N6 foldable, it may bring a seamless hinge that minimizes the display crease.

Wide foldables are suddenly in

Wide foldables trade the tall proportions of devices such as the Galaxy Z Fold 7 for a shorter, more tablet-like shape. The format could provide a better canvas for movies, games, and a lot more. Huawei has already entered this territory with the Pura X Max, which carries a 5.5-inch outer display and opens into a 7.6-inch, 16:10 screen. Samsung’s upcoming Fold 8 lineup and Apple’s rumored foldable are expected to push the shape toward a much larger audience.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


YouTube has an AI slop problem, and its crackdown is catching legitimate creators in the crossfire. Faceless channels, where no human host ever appears on screen, have existed for years and are not inherently AI-generated.

Many are run by solo creators who simply prefer to stay anonymous. The problem is that AI tools made it easy to flood the platform with low-effort faceless content at scale, and YouTube’s algorithm is now penalizing the format as a whole.

How bad is the AI slop problem on YouTube?

A Kapwing study found that roughly 21% of the first 500 videos recommended to a new YouTube account were classified as AI slop, while 33% fell into a broader brainrot category. The problem extends to children, too, as more than 40% of YouTube Shorts recommended to kids in a 15-minute session contained low-quality AI content.

YouTube’s response has been to tweak its algorithm to favor videos with real human faces on camera, which is hitting faceless creators even when their content is entirely human-made.

How is YouTube tackling its AI slop problem?

YouTube is now testing a new pop-up on mobile that asks viewers to rate whether a video feels like AI slop, on a scale from “not at all” to “extremely.” The idea sounds reasonable, but crowdsourcing AI detection has real problems. People are bad at spotting AI content, and they are getting worse at it as AI capabilities continue to improve.

There are also legitimate concerns that YouTube could use this viewer feedback as training data for its own AI models, potentially making future AI-generated content even harder to spot.

🚨 Did you just see what YouTube did?

YouTube isn’t banning AI slop.. They’re making you label it so they can train their next model to not look like slop.

Read that again…

You flag the bad AI content. YouTube collects it. Google feeds it into Veo 4… Then next year their… https://t.co/8UC2J3mjjv pic.twitter.com/mIrTChqC1b

— Tuki (@TukiFromKL) March 17, 2026

Meanwhile, faceless creators are scrambling to adapt. According to The Hollywood Reporter, some are hiring cheap on-camera hosts through platforms like Fiverr and Upwork. Others are doubling down on niche educational content, which has held up better than broad content farms.

The AI text-to-video space is still valued at enormous sums, with Higgsfield AI alone sitting at $1 billion, but on YouTube, the math for faceless creators is getting harder to work out every month.



Source link