NATO taps Accenture and Leonardo for €200M secure cloud



NATO wants a cloud it can trust under fire. Its technology agency has signed a contract worth about €200 million with Accenture and Italy’s Leonardo to build one. Accenture announced the deal on Tuesday, struck at the NATO summit in Ankara.

NATO calls the programme the Protected Business Network. It will give the Alliance a single, classified cloud environment where commanders and staff share data and coordinate across every domain. The pitch is resilience: a system built to keep running when attackers try to knock it down.

What the deal covers

Accenture and Leonardo will design, build and run the core platform over seven years, on a multi-cloud setup that NATO’s agency provides. It will reach roughly 29,000 users across the Alliance. The North Atlantic Council has approved it as an Alliance-wide capability.

The plan swaps NATO’s patchwork of legacy systems for a common cloud model and standard engineering. New digital services should then ship faster. Leonardo brings a Zero Trust security design and its own AI multi-agentic platform for cyber defence.

A European backbone

The line-up matters as much as the tech. The work goes to Accenture’s EMEA arm and to Leonardo, an Italian defence group, not to a US contractor. That fits a wider European push to own its defence software and its secure military cloud, rather than lean on American suppliers.

It lands at a pointed moment. Worries over US control of frontier AI have shadowed the Ankara summit, alongside pressure on allies to strip out untrusted kit and rebuild their networks. A homegrown cloud backbone reads as part of that answer.

Why it matters

Defence increasingly looks like a software problem. Speed, secure data and interoperability now shape readiness as much as hardware does. NATO is betting a modern cloud lets it move faster and absorb attacks, with European hands on the controls. Money flows the same way, with fresh funds chasing European defence tech. The build starts now. The real test comes when something tries to break it.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


AirPods Pro 3

Jada Jones/ZDNET

This year’s WWDC is packed with announcements, including customization to the Liquid Glass display, substantial upgrades to Siri, and more intuitive device functionality.

Also: Apple WWDC 2026: Live updates on iOS 27, Siri, and Tim Cook’s last event as CEO

If you’re an avid AirPods user, there’s one announcement that may excite you, but speakers breezed past it, offering hardly any details. Still, Apple promised a real equalizer in iOS 27, finally giving users the opportunity to customize the sound of their AirPods. 

Apple didn’t say much about the equalizer, but a brief animation showed a graphic EQ, with options to create a custom EQ profile or choose Apple’s recommended EQ settings. Users can adjust lows, mids, and highs, though it’s unclear how precise the equalizer will be.

AirPods EQ WWDC

Apple

Previously, Apple had full faith in its headphones’ sound profile, vowing that its sound engineers crafted AirPods to sound as best as possible. Still, users prefer some control over their devices, and a custom EQ is a welcome addition.

Also: The feature Apple needs to make HomePod stand out isn’t audio-related

AirPods users could only change their AirPods sound profiles in Apple Music settings, and this customization feature still limited them to preset EQ profiles. 

An equalizer is a staple feature for consumer headphones, and even the most limited equalizers are better than none. Bose’s equalizer, for example, allows users to toggle bass, mids, and treble on a 20-point scale. 

Other companies, like JBL, offer a detailed equalizer with 10 frequency bands, adjustable in Hz. I don’t expect Apple’s equalizer to be as thorough as JBL’s, but instead to be on par with Bose’s. Either way, even if you’re content with your AirPods’ sound profile, the option to change it is what matters. 





Source link