Toyota shifts Tacoma output to Texas; Trump claims credit


TL;DR

Toyota will invest $3.6bn to expand its San Antonio plant and shift some Tacoma pickup production from Mexico to Texas over about four years, adding 2,000 jobs. Trump claimed credit for tariffs, but Toyota did not attribute the move to tariffs and is not leaving Mexico. The announcement lands amid USMCA uncertainty after the US declined to renew the pact in its current form on 1 July.

Toyota will invest $3.6bn to expand its San Antonio plant and move some Tacoma pickup production from Mexico to Texas. The carmaker announced the plan on Monday, adding a second assembly line, according to CNBC.

President Donald Trump quickly claimed the move as proof his trade policy is working. “That’s what tariffs do, properly used,” he said during a visit to Ankara, Turkey.

Toyota told a different story, or rather, no such story at all. Its announcement did not attribute the expansion to tariffs, with North America chief Ted Ogawa citing “confidence in the region’s workforce, innovation, and long-term growth potential”.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Crucially, the company is not exiting Mexico. Production will shift gradually from its Baja California plant over roughly four years, while Toyota keeps building Tacomas in Guanajuato and the Corolla in Mexico too.

The expansion adds about 2,000 jobs and 2.5 million square feet, doubling the Texas site by 2030 and lifting annual capacity by 150,000 vehicles. It brings Toyota’s total San Antonio investment to $8.3bn since 2003.

The tariff the carmaker actually felt

Trump’s framing skips an inconvenient number. Toyota’s North American arm swung to an operating loss in the year to March 2026, with US tariffs stripping roughly $9bn from operating income.

Reshoring a line is one response to that pain, but so is raising prices or absorbing the hit. Automakers across the board are recalculating, with a dozen EV models pulled from the US market as tariffs and the lost tax credit reshape the maths.

The policy backdrop is genuinely turbulent. The US declined on 1 July to renew USMCA in its current form, opting for annual reviews, and is pushing to require that 50% of automotive value be made in America.

Toyota nodded to that uncertainty, urging a “quick resolution” to USMCA while reaffirming its commitment to all three North American countries. That is a carmaker hedging, not celebrating.

A win either way

For Trump, the optics are strong regardless of Toyota’s framing, since a marquee brand is adding US factory jobs on his watch. His administration has argued tariffs and the shifting US market push carmakers to build domestically.

Toyota, meanwhile, is riding real US momentum, closing in on GM as hybrids surge and rivals’ EV sales soften. Expanding where your trucks sell well is a straightforward business call.

Both readings can be true at once, with tariffs raising the cost of Mexican production and Texas offering a growing market and workforce. The gap is only in who gets to take the bow, and the cross-border squeeze extends well beyond Toyota, reaching Tesla’s own tariff-driven sourcing shuffles.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


YouTube has an AI slop problem, and its crackdown is catching legitimate creators in the crossfire. Faceless channels, where no human host ever appears on screen, have existed for years and are not inherently AI-generated.

Many are run by solo creators who simply prefer to stay anonymous. The problem is that AI tools made it easy to flood the platform with low-effort faceless content at scale, and YouTube’s algorithm is now penalizing the format as a whole.

How bad is the AI slop problem on YouTube?

A Kapwing study found that roughly 21% of the first 500 videos recommended to a new YouTube account were classified as AI slop, while 33% fell into a broader brainrot category. The problem extends to children, too, as more than 40% of YouTube Shorts recommended to kids in a 15-minute session contained low-quality AI content.

YouTube’s response has been to tweak its algorithm to favor videos with real human faces on camera, which is hitting faceless creators even when their content is entirely human-made.

How is YouTube tackling its AI slop problem?

YouTube is now testing a new pop-up on mobile that asks viewers to rate whether a video feels like AI slop, on a scale from “not at all” to “extremely.” The idea sounds reasonable, but crowdsourcing AI detection has real problems. People are bad at spotting AI content, and they are getting worse at it as AI capabilities continue to improve.

There are also legitimate concerns that YouTube could use this viewer feedback as training data for its own AI models, potentially making future AI-generated content even harder to spot.

🚨 Did you just see what YouTube did?

YouTube isn’t banning AI slop.. They’re making you label it so they can train their next model to not look like slop.

Read that again…

You flag the bad AI content. YouTube collects it. Google feeds it into Veo 4… Then next year their… https://t.co/8UC2J3mjjv pic.twitter.com/mIrTChqC1b

— Tuki (@TukiFromKL) March 17, 2026

Meanwhile, faceless creators are scrambling to adapt. According to The Hollywood Reporter, some are hiring cheap on-camera hosts through platforms like Fiverr and Upwork. Others are doubling down on niche educational content, which has held up better than broad content farms.

The AI text-to-video space is still valued at enormous sums, with Higgsfield AI alone sitting at $1 billion, but on YouTube, the math for faceless creators is getting harder to work out every month.



Source link