Reddit fights AI marketing spam with its own AI



People increasingly ask ChatGPT instead of Google. So marketers now plant fake opinions on Reddit, hoping the chatbots repeat them. Reddit is fighting back with AI of its own.

Reddit has a new spam problem, and a strange one. Brands seed the platform with stealth marketing, Bloomberg reports. They plant posts and comments that pose as genuine user opinion. The goal: get AI chatbots such as ChatGPT and Gemini to quote them as real advice.

Why Reddit is the target

OpenAI and Google both pay Reddit for its content. Chatbots lean on the site because people trust its unfiltered, human conversations. That trust makes Reddit one of the most cited sources in AI answers. It also makes it the perfect place to game.

Plant the right thread, and a chatbot might recommend your product as if a real person had vouched for it. That is the heart of a fast-growing discipline called generative engine optimisation, or GEO. Think of it as the AI-era successor to search engine optimisation.

Fighting AI with AI

Reddit now turns the same technology on the spammers. Its improved systems caught 25,000 “spammy posts and comments” a day in the first quarter, the company said. That cut user exposure by 20 per cent year on year.

Large language models now spot “the subtle, coordinated patterns of fake behaviour and artificial hype” that older tools missed. Reddit also checks new accounts for warning signs before they can post.

Humans still do much of the work. Community moderators handled more than half of all removals in the second half of 2025, Reddit disclosed.

A cat-and-mouse game

Marketers refuse to give up. Shanzila Ahmed runs the agency ReachLLM. She said she has landed client posts in ChatGPT within a day, though Reddit later removed some of them. Her workaround captures the whole contest. “We just need to keep pushing out good new content at regular intervals,” she said. Investors smell opportunity too.

The GEO startup Profound topped a $1bn valuation this year. It joins a new breed of firms built to make brands visible to AI.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


AirPods Pro 3

Jada Jones/ZDNET

This year’s WWDC is packed with announcements, including customization to the Liquid Glass display, substantial upgrades to Siri, and more intuitive device functionality.

Also: Apple WWDC 2026: Live updates on iOS 27, Siri, and Tim Cook’s last event as CEO

If you’re an avid AirPods user, there’s one announcement that may excite you, but speakers breezed past it, offering hardly any details. Still, Apple promised a real equalizer in iOS 27, finally giving users the opportunity to customize the sound of their AirPods. 

Apple didn’t say much about the equalizer, but a brief animation showed a graphic EQ, with options to create a custom EQ profile or choose Apple’s recommended EQ settings. Users can adjust lows, mids, and highs, though it’s unclear how precise the equalizer will be.

AirPods EQ WWDC

Apple

Previously, Apple had full faith in its headphones’ sound profile, vowing that its sound engineers crafted AirPods to sound as best as possible. Still, users prefer some control over their devices, and a custom EQ is a welcome addition.

Also: The feature Apple needs to make HomePod stand out isn’t audio-related

AirPods users could only change their AirPods sound profiles in Apple Music settings, and this customization feature still limited them to preset EQ profiles. 

An equalizer is a staple feature for consumer headphones, and even the most limited equalizers are better than none. Bose’s equalizer, for example, allows users to toggle bass, mids, and treble on a 20-point scale. 

Other companies, like JBL, offer a detailed equalizer with 10 frequency bands, adjustable in Hz. I don’t expect Apple’s equalizer to be as thorough as JBL’s, but instead to be on par with Bose’s. Either way, even if you’re content with your AirPods’ sound profile, the option to change it is what matters. 





Source link