I used ASUS’ dual-screen laptop as a portable creative station, and my desk PC started collecting dust


With laptops, brands are constantly in a balancing act between portability and workspace productivity. The ASUS Zenbook Duo UX8407AA tries to dodge that choice with a design that brings a whole setup in a compact form factor.

I used the Zenbook Duo as a creative machine, mainly with design apps, illustration work, writing, and multitasking. The model I tried runs on Intel’s Core Ultra 7 355, paired with 32GB of memory and a 1TB SSD. That gives it enough horsepower to handle Photoshop and Animate, for sketches and animations, and a lot more without breaking a sweat.

But the real winner is the form factor. This is a laptop that can turn into a dual-monitor workstation, a conventional notebook, or a drawing setup with a detachable keyboard moved out of the way. For a lot of creative professionals, especially beginners, students, and people who work on the go, this flexibility is great.

How the second screen changes the workflow

The Zenbook Duo has two 14-inch 3K OLED touch displays, and the easiest way to use it is with the built-in kickstand propping both screens vertically. In this mode, it gives you two stacked displays instead of one cramped laptop panel. For my usual work that involves a lot of writing and research, the added screen real estate really helped. I could keep a document on one screen, a browser on the other, and avoid the constant window juggling that makes small laptops annoying during real work.

Even for content work, I had YouTube, social media accounts, and more tabs open at the same time without feeling squeezed. But where the Zenbook Duo really shines is in design work, which is clearly what it was built for. In Photoshop, the top screen became a control and reference area, while the bottom screen became the canvas. Tool panels, layers, color controls, browser references, and the ASUS utilities panel could all sit away from the actual drawing space. And yes, the finer controls in the utilities app for the stylus were pretty handy.

Creative apps often bury the canvas under panels, pop-ups, timelines, brushes, and layers. The Zenbook Duo can make all of those elements live right on the surface, always being just a tap away on the other screen.

ASUS Pen made the experience even better

The ASUS Pen makes the Zenbook Duo more than a multitasking laptop. Drawing directly on the lower screen felt natural when I removed the detachable keyboard and placed it separately on the table. In that setup, the laptop became more like a portable drawing station than a traditional notebook.

The screen is bright, sharp, and responsive, and the 144Hz refresh rate helps the whole interaction feel smooth. Touch input was solid, and the pen handled pressure and tilt well enough for sketching, illustration, and casual design work. For beginner and intermediate creators, I can see this being more than enough.

Palm rejection was the only part that soured the experience a little. It wasn’t always consistent when I used the power screen as a drawing surface. My palm and forearm occasionally registered touches while I was working, which became frustrating as these false inputs resulted in random lines on top of my sketches.

Professional illustrators who rely on higher-end drawing tablets may still prefer dedicated hardware. Many entry-level drawing tablets offer higher pressure levels than the ASUS Pen’s 4096 levels. Most users, though, won’t realize the difference. Another big advantage here is convenience. This one machine packs two screens, a stylus, and creative controls.

A design that stays adaptable

The Zenbook Duo does not lock you into one layout. Attach the keyboard, and it looks like a regular laptop. Remove it, use the kickstand, and you get two displays stacked on top of each other. Lay it down differently, and the bottom screen becomes a drawing pad while the top screen handles tools and references.

You might need a normal laptop at one moment, and a second display in another. ASUS’ dual-screen laptop handles all of these situations better than a regular laptop would. It is still thicker and heavier than a simple ultrabook, and the price means it is not an impulse buy. A laptop plus a separate drawing tablet may cost less, depending on what you choose. But having a one-stop solution gives artists more convenience. You’re not carrying multiple devices, a secondary display, an additional set of wires, and other peripherals. You open one machine and get a workable creative desk almost anywhere.

A clever one-stop creative machine

The Zenbook Duo UX8407AA will make the most sense for people who bounce between different kinds of work. Designers, illustrators, content creators, students, writers, editors, and heavy multitaskers will get more from it than someone who just wants a thin laptop for email and streaming. It is especially appealing for beginners and mobile creators who want an all-in-one setup before investing in a full desk, external monitor, and dedicated drawing tablet.

The screens are excellent, with the dual displays and pen adding to the experience. ASUS built the Zenbook Duo as one of those odd laptops where the unusual design has a clear purpose. Used the right way, it becomes a portable creative workstation that can replace several pieces of gear in one shot.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


TL;DR

Meta stripped NameTag facial recognition code from its AI app one day after WIRED exposed it on 50 million phones. Meta says no decision has been made.

Meta removed nearly all traces of an unreleased facial recognition system from its smart glasses companion app on Friday, one day after WIRED reported that the software had been quietly embedded in an app installed on more than 50 million phones. The feature, which Meta internally called NameTag, was designed to convert faces captured by the company’s Ray-Ban smart glasses into unique biometric signatures and compare them against a database stored on the user’s device. WIRED also found that faces the system failed to recognise were cropped, indexed, and stored locally for future processing.

Andy Stone, Meta’s vice president of communications, told WIRED on Monday that the feature is “purely exploratory,” adding that no final decision has been made on what to do with it. That characterisation sits uneasily with the evidence WIRED documented. The version of Meta AI published the day of WIRED’s Thursday report contained several code libraries explicitly named for face recognition, a process for running the NameTag recognition pipeline, and a “Person recognised” alert the app would have shown if someone were identified.

Friday’s release stripped all of it out, along with a folder where the app would have stored the cropped images and biometric signatures of unrecognised faces. Meta did not answer WIRED’s questions about why the code was removed or whether the changes were planned before the story was published. A few fragments remain in the latest version, including an internal debug menu label and a dormant link meant to open a recognised person’s profile, pointing to parts of the system that are no longer there.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The gap between Meta’s public statements and the code WIRED found is the central tension. Before the Thursday report, Stone dismissed the findings by writing that the company could not answer questions about how the system would work because “the feature does not exist.” Andrew Bosworth, Meta’s chief technology officer, called the reporting “incredibly misleading” and “absolutely dishonest.” Yet the code was functional enough to include three AI models, one to detect faces, another to crop them, and a third to encode them as biometric data, all embedded in the companion app for a product already at the centre of a mounting privacy crisis.

Meta declined to answer ten questions WIRED posed before publishing, including whether it had already created the database of face profiles NameTag uses, how long the app retains photographs and biometric data of unrecognised people, and whether that data would ever be sent back to Meta’s servers. The company also did not respond to questions about whether it was building NameTag for blind or low-vision users, or to criticism from privacy advocates who warned the system could let stalkers and abusers identify strangers in public.

NameTag first surfaced in February, when The New York Times, citing internal Meta documents, reported that the company was developing face recognition for its smart glasses and considering a launch as early as this year. One internal memo reportedly described releasing the feature during a “dynamic political environment” when privacy and civil liberties advocates would be distracted by other concerns. WIRED subsequently found that much of NameTag’s machinery had been built into the Meta AI app as early as January, months before any public acknowledgement, adding another layer to the company’s pattern of shipping first and disclosing later when it comes to its smart glasses.

Kade Crockford, director of the technology for liberty programme at the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, said the removal does not undo the original decision to ship the code and pointed to it as evidence that consumer privacy needs stronger legal protection than Congress has been willing to provide. The Massachusetts House of Representatives last week unanimously passed a consumer privacy bill that, if enacted as written, would impose strong enforcement provisions including a private right of action allowing aggrieved users to sue. “State lawmakers need to do their job and step up to protect consumer privacy,” Crockford said.

Meta’s sneaky tactics in slipping the face-recognition code into its smart glasses show exactly why data privacy bills need the teeth of strong enforcement,” Crockford added. “Companies like Meta prioritise their bottom line, so lawmakers need to speak in the only language its C-suite understands.” Whether a code removal prompted by investigative reporting constitutes a victory or merely a tactical retreat depends on what Meta does next, and on whether the regulatory pressure building on both sides of the Atlantic produces enforceable consequences before the feature quietly returns under a different name.



Source link