A $3.7bn plan to merge the world’s two biggest stock-photo libraries has collapsed. The reason is not America, where regulators waved it through. It is Britain, where a single condition proved a deal-breaker.
Getty Images will terminate its merger with Shutterstock, the company said this week. Its board voted unanimously to walk away after the UK’s competition regulator attached a condition it would not meet. The plan, first reported by the Wall Street Journal, is to end the agreement on 6 July, barring a late change of circumstances.
The deal was announced in January 2025 as a “merger of equals.” It would have combined Getty’s picture-and-video wire service with Shutterstock’s library of some 450mn images. The new company would have sat under Getty chief executive Craig Peters. The two firms projected $150mn to $200mn in cost savings within three years.
Cleared in the US, blocked in the UK
The obstacle was the Competition and Markets Authority. In May, the UK watchdog said it would only approve the tie-up if Shutterstock sold its global editorial business, including the Backgrid and Splash celebrity photo agencies. Losing competition between the two firms, it argued, would cut choice for British media outlets and could push prices up.
Getty said it was “not required” to accept that condition under the merger terms. Its board chose to abandon the deal rather than carve up Shutterstock. The contrast with Washington is stark. America’s Department of Justice had already cleared the merger unconditionally earlier this year.
Investors reacted fast. Shutterstock shares fell about 30 per cent in after-hours trading once the filing landed. Getty said that if the deal dies, it will redeem a tranche of senior secured notes and hire an adviser to weigh other financing options.
Two rivals, one common enemy
Getty and Shutterstock did not try to merge out of strength. Both sell licensed images to media and business customers. Both face a fast-moving threat from AI image generators that produce pictures on demand for almost nothing. Joining forces was a way to cut costs and defend a shrinking market, part of a wider wave of media dealmaking that runs from Bending Spoons’ rollup of ageing internet brands to the studios.
Both firms have since made a separate peace with the technology. Each recently signed a licensing deal with OpenAI, and Getty’s pact to feed its library into ChatGPT sent its shares higher. The merger was meant to be the bigger, structural answer. Now that answer is gone.
Britain’s regulator flexes again
The collapse shows how much power the CMA now holds over global technology deals. It is the same regulator that imposed new conduct rules on Google and forced it to let publishers opt out of AI search. It is also the body that made Meta sell Giphy in 2021. A US green light, this saga shows, is no longer enough.
The timing matters. The CMA is weighing whether to intervene in Paramount’s takeover of Warner Bros Discovery, a far larger media deal. Getty’s retreat is a warning of what UK scrutiny can do. It also leaves two stock-photo giants to face the AI era alone rather than as one company. Media firms that once sued OpenAI over training are watching the same forces reshape the picture business, where consolidation just hit a wall.
Stephan is the sports journalist for the Maple Grove Report.
