The Court of Justice of the European Union has dismissed Google’s final appeal against a €4.1 billion antitrust fine, ending an eight-year fight over how the company built Android into a vehicle for its search and browser dominance. The ruling, handed down on Thursday, leaves the penalty intact and closes off any further judicial route for Google inside the bloc.
The case traces back to 2018, when the European Commission fined Google €4.34 billion for what it called illegal reinforcement of its search dominance.
Regulators found that Google made the Play Store available to phone makers only if they also pre-installed Google Search and Chrome, and paid some manufacturers and network operators to keep rival search apps off their devices entirely.
The Commission’s central complaint, as Bloomberg reported, was that Google used Android’s near-ubiquity to cement a monopoly it might not have held on the merits of search alone.
Google’s Android antitrust fight has run in parallel with a separate €2.4 billion shopping-services case, which the company also lost on appeal. Both cases sit inside the EU’s broader pattern of treating Google’s platform control as the problem, rather than any single product decision.
The General Court, the EU’s second-highest tribunal, took a first pass at the case in 2022. It sided with the Commission’s core finding but trimmed the fine to €4.125 billion, ruling that regulators had not adequately proven that Google’s revenue-sharing deals with manufacturers caused separate harm beyond the bundling itself.
Google pressed on, appealing to the Court of Justice, the EU’s highest court, arguing that the Commission should have modelled what the market would have looked like without its conduct before setting the penalty.
That argument found little traction. Advocate General Juliane Kokott recommended last year that the appeal be thrown out entirely, and the court’s judges have now followed her opinion, which is customary though not binding.
At the time of that recommendation, a Google spokesperson said the company was disappointed with the reasoning, warning it would “discourage investment in open platforms and harm Android users, partners and app developers” if adopted.
Google has not commented publicly since Thursday’s judgment, and it was not clear whether the company would issue a fresh statement.
There is no further appeal available. The Court of Justice is the final stop in the EU’s judicial system, which means the €4.1 billion figure, reduced once already from the Commission’s original number, now stands as settled law rather than a contested claim on Google’s balance sheet.
Alphabet has long had the cash reserves to absorb the penalty without difficulty, so the more lasting cost is likely to be regulatory rather than financial, another precedent Brussels can point to when it argues that Google’s platforms need structural limits rather than case-by-case fixes.
The timing lands awkwardly for Google, which is simultaneously negotiating with Brussels over a separate and more forward-looking fight.
Regulators are pushing the company to open Android’s interoperability features under the Digital Markets Act, so that rival AI assistants such as ChatGPT and Claude can plug into the same system-level hooks currently reserved for Gemini.
A binding decision on those measures is expected this month, meaning Google faces the close of one Android-shaped regulatory chapter just as the next one opens.
The company’s other run-ins with European competition law have not gone any better lately. Alphabet is separately contesting a near-€3 billion adtech fine issued last year, arguing across 17 grounds of appeal that the Commission got the underlying market analysis wrong. Google was also fined in Italy this year over restrictions placed on a competing app’s access to Android Auto.
None of that touches the sum now finalised in Thursday’s judgment, but it points to a company still negotiating, case by case, how much control it gets to keep over the operating system that sits on the vast majority of the world’s phones.
Stephan is the sports journalist for the Maple Grove Report.
