5 free and open-source software (FOSS) to replace Microsoft, Google, and big tech


You don’t really own much of your digital life. Your files live on someone else’s servers, your phone reports back to its manufacturer, and the software you rely on every day can change its terms, raise its price, or disappear whenever the company behind it decides. That’s the trade most of us made without thinking about it: convenience in exchange for control.

The good news is that the free and open-source world has quietly gotten good enough to take that control back—and not in a “rough around the edges, only-for-nerds” way. A lot of it is genuinely better than the proprietary stuff it replaces. Here are five such free and open source software to help you replace Microsoft, Google, and big tech.

Linux for your desktop

Because the OS underneath matters more than the apps on top

Before we get to the apps, I want to start with the operating system. You can replace every proprietary app you own with a FOSS alternative, but if the OS underneath is still proprietary, you haven’t really solved the problem.

Now, the FOSS operating system that I’m going to recommend is Linux (yes, there are other non-Linux FOSS OS as well). Modern Linux has come a long way, and the old presumption of it being too technical or terminal-centric is essentially a myth at this point. In fact, I’d go as far as saying some Linux distros are actually better and more user-friendly than Windows itself.

For example, you’ve got Linux Mint, targeted at casual users migrating from Windows. It offers the same familiar Windows-like layout with a taskbar on the bottom and a Start Menu-like app launcher for opening your apps. Alternatively, if you’re a Windows power user looking for more features and customizability, you can go for Kubuntu, which still carries the same layout, but a lot more options for you to play with.

I should also mention that migrating to Linux isn’t just limited to Windows users. You can also install Linux on Apple hardware. Granted, the support pool isn’t as wide as with Windows hardware, but it’s still there. Most Ubuntu-based distros tend to work on older Intel-based MacBooks just fine. Whereas, if you’re on the newer models, you can consider Asahi Linux, which is custom-built for Apple Silicon.


Some Linux Distro screens.


6 distros that prove Linux is the future of desktop PCs

Plenty of proof that a Linux distro can be polished, stable, and easy to use.

A private custom ROM for your phone

The same reason as switching your desktop OS

The same logic that applies to your desktop also applies to your smartphone. If you’re using a Pixel, a Samsung, or a OnePlus, there’s usually a lot of telemetry and tracking happening under the hood. And same as before, the best way to rid yourself of all that nonsense is by installing a custom ROM.

Installing a custom ROM is a bit more involved than installing desktop Linux, but it’s not programmer-level complicated. There are tons of guides, and XDA in particular covers just about every phone out there.

For most people, LineageOS is the one I’d point you to. It runs on a huge range of phones and gives you a clean, stock Android experience with none of Google’s software or Play Services bundled in. But if your priority is maximum privacy and security, with no telemetry at all, then GrapheneOS is the better call. The catch is that GrapheneOS only installs on Pixel phones at the moment, so it’s the stronger pick if you’re on a Pixel.

That said, the most important rule to keep in mind is to always find a custom ROM that’s specifically built for your exact smartphone model. If you install a random custom ROM on your phone, it can lead to hardware incompatibility—where the camera, sim, or even Wi-Fi won’t work.

iPhones don’t have custom ROMs in the same sense as Android phones. There are some jailbreaking and experimental projects out there, but I wouldn’t recommend them as the chances of bricking your thousand dollar smartphone are really high. Instead, if you’re serious about going FOSS, I’d recommend getting a cheap Android phone and flashing a custom ROM on it.

Zen browser

Firefox’s core, with a UI overhaul

After the operating system, the place we spend the most time in is the browser. We use the browser for research, shopping on Amazon, booking tickets, and sending emails. Many apps also have web versions that we access through the browser. As such, picking a good FOSS browser is an important step if you don’t want big tech tracking all your activity.

Ideally, you want a browser that not only respects your privacy but also blocks websites and advertisers from tracking you. However, that’s easier said than done on the modern internet, since some websites can break if you enable aggressive privacy protections. The most popular FOSS browser that strikes a good balance between privacy and real-world usability is Firefox.

However, if you want something that feels a bit more modern, you can take a look at Zen Browser. It’s based on Firefox, so you’re getting the same privacy-focused core, but with a more opinionated setup. However, the main reason I’m recommending it, though, is because it simply looks and feels much cleaner and more modern than Firefox.

You get a complete reimagining of the user interface with vertical tabs, split view, and the address bar moved to the side panel—similar to Arc browser. This frees up the full height of your screen for the websites you’re viewing, which, in my opinion, is better use of your screen space—especially since most modern monitors are wider than they’re tall.


A smartphone in the middle of the screen with Google Chrome Incognito window open.


Incognito mode doesn’t do what you think it does

Private browsing isn’t as private as most people think. Here’s what it actually hides and what it still exposes.

I’m recommending Zen Browser with the assumption that you’ve migrated to Linux. You can technically use Zen on Windows or macOS, but it currently lacks DRM support on those platforms, which means streaming services like Netflix won’t work. In that case, a more practical FOSS browser for Windows or macOS would be Brave.

Nextcloud

Self-host your own cloud server

Next on our list is Nextcloud—the ticket to building your own cloud server. You can think of it as a FOSS alternative to services like Google Drive, Google Workspace, or even Microsoft 365. It’s a self-hosted platform that you install on a system—this can be your main PC, but ideally you’d install it on a spare PC or NAS and turn it into a home server.

UGREEN NASync DSP2800 thumbnail

Brand

UGREEN

CPU

Intel 12th Gen N-Series

This cutting-edge network-attached storage device transforms how you store and access data via smartphones, laptops, tablets, and TVs anywhere with network access.


Once installed, it lets you host your own cloud storage and access it from all your devices. Whether you’re on your local network or connecting remotely over the internet, your files stay under your control instead of being stored on Google Drive or Microsoft OneDrive.

But Nextcloud goes far beyond storage. It also gives you access to self-hosted apps for calendars, photos, notes, contacts, and even video conferencing. If you own a custom domain, you can also integrate it with a mail server to manage your own email ecosystem.

However, its best feature, in my opinion, is support for OnlyOffice and Collabora Office. This means you can work with documents, spreadsheets, and presentations directly inside Nextcloud, making it a practical replacement for Microsoft Office in many workflows. It also supports real-time collaboration, which makes it especially useful for multi-user setups.


A collage showing the ONLYOFFICE interface with open documents, collaborative comments, and AI model settings, surrounded by floating Microsoft Word icons marked with red X.


I replaced Microsoft Word with a self-hosted, open-source alternative

It also includes a spreadsheet and presentation editor!

Portmaster

If you want to entirely eliminate big tech from your life

Last on the list is Portmaster, a network monitor and application-level firewall. Now, it’s here on the list for a different reason than the rest. It doesn’t replace a proprietary app that you’re already using—instead, it stops your system from talking to big-tech servers in the first place.

The app basically allows you to flip on a filter for big tech, and once you do, every domain tied to those companies gets blocked. It’s an instant way to decouple from their infrastructure. The problem is that a lot of the services you use day-to-day rely on those servers, and it’s only when you switch them off do you realize how dependent you are.

So, theoretically, that leaves you with two options: hunt down alternatives that don’t rely on big tech domains—at all, or work normally and monitor which servers your apps reach out to, and block only the ones that you feel really comfortable with.

Other than this, Portmaster also allows you to block just apps on an individual basis from connecting to the internet. I find it a very effective way to force apps into a pseudo-offline mode. I personally use this on Obsidian, which by nature is offline, but sometimes third-party plugins I install on it can connect to the internet. With Portmaster, I can stop that type of unwarranted communication right in its tracks.


FOSS is just as good as proprietary software—with the added benefit of ownership

There was a time when free and open-source software just wasn’t as good as the paid stuff, but we don’t live in that era anymore. FOSS is genuinely powerful now—some more so than their paid alternatives. That said, you don’t have to move to a FOSS stack overnight. Pick whichever item on this list feels easiest and start there. One step at a time is how you eventually and sustainably cut yourself loose from big tech and move to a world of data ownership.


Proton VPN, Handy, and Upscayl running in a Windows 11 PC with those apps saved in the Start Menu.


3 more free and open source (FOSS) apps that are better than their paid alternatives

I stopped paying for software and started feeling a little ridiculous about all the years I didn’t.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


TL;DR

India debates sovereign AI after the US forced Anthropic to kill Fable 5, with proposals for a $5B fund and calls to embrace open-source models.

When the US government ordered Anthropic to shut down Fable 5 and Mythos 5 on 12 June, the export control directive was aimed at restricting foreign nationals from accessing America’s most capable AI. In India, Anthropic’s second-largest market, it landed as a warning shot about what happens when your AI infrastructure runs on someone else’s politics.

The suspension cut off Indian developers and enterprises from Claude’s most advanced models overnight. India’s Claude run-rate revenue had doubled since October 2025, and Tata Consultancy Services had announced a partnership just one day earlier, on 11 June, to train 50,000 employees on Claude and build a dedicated Anthropic business unit. That deal is now in limbo.

The timing has turned what was already a simmering debate about AI sovereignty into a full strategic reckoning. Proposals that sounded ambitious a week ago now sound urgent.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Mohandas Pai, former Infosys CFO and one of India’s most prominent tech investors, has called for a ₹50,000 crore (roughly $5 billion) annual sovereign AI fund. He has also proposed a ₹2 lakh crore (approximately $21 billion) credit guarantee to finance cloud infrastructure, hardware procurement, and semiconductor development. The figures dwarf the government’s existing commitment.

India approved its IndiaAI Mission in March 2024 with a budget of ₹10,372 crore, approximately $1.25 billion. The programme has deployed around 38,000 GPUs so far. Pai’s proposal would quadruple annual spending and add a credit backstop an order of magnitude larger.

Sridhar Vembu, the founder of Zoho, has gone further. He argued that India should embrace smaller and open-source models, including Chinese ones, rather than depend on American frontier systems that can be switched off by executive order. “Technology is the ultimate weapon,” Vembu said. “Globalization is dead and Bharat must find her own way ahead.

The argument has teeth because the suspension demonstrated exactly the vulnerability Vembu is describing. Amazon’s CEO reportedly triggered the government crackdown by telling Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that researchers had used Fable 5 to obtain information that could be used in cyberattacks. Anthropic called the action disproportionate, but compliance was immediate and global.

Policy expert Prasanto Roy put it bluntly: “American AI models are bound to American geopolitics.” For Indian enterprises that had built workflows around Claude, the lesson was that access to frontier AI is a privilege that can be revoked without notice, without consultation, and without regard for the commercial relationships it disrupts.

The Indian startup ecosystem is already adapting. Sarvam, a Bengaluru-based AI company, released 30-billion and 105-billion parameter open-source models at the India AI Impact Summit in 2026. Krutrim, founded by Ola’s Bhavish Aggarwal, has pivoted from building foundational models to providing cloud and AI infrastructure services, reporting ₹3 billion in revenue for fiscal year 2026.

Neither company is close to matching the capabilities of Fable 5 or Mythos 5. But the argument for sovereign AI was never about matching frontier performance immediately. It is about ensuring that the floor does not fall out when Washington makes a unilateral decision about who gets to use which models.

Aakrit Vaish, founder of the AI startup Activate, said the suspension “completely changes things” for the sovereign AI debate. Vijay Rayapati, CEO of Atomicwork, raised concerns about what the precedent means for Indian companies with multi-country teams that depend on American AI providers. If the US can shut off model access to enforce export controls, any country that relies on American AI is one policy decision away from disruption.

Not everyone agrees that India needs to build its own frontier models. Hemant Mohapatra, a partner at Lightspeed Venture Partners, argued that talent and compute access matter more than capital for building competitive AI. India has the engineering workforce, but the compute gap is significant, and closing it requires either massive domestic investment or continued access to foreign cloud infrastructure.

Anthropic opened a Bengaluru office as part of its India expansion, and the TCS partnership was designed to be a cornerstone of its enterprise strategy in the country. Whether those plans survive the suspension intact depends on how quickly Anthropic can restore access and whether Indian enterprises still trust a provider whose most capable models can vanish overnight.

The broader pattern is unmistakable. The US has spent four years tightening controls on AI technology, from chip export restrictions to model-level interventions. Each escalation pushes more countries toward the conclusion that dependence on American AI infrastructure carries political risk. India, with its 1.4 billion people and rapidly growing technology sector, is now asking whether it can afford that risk, and what it would cost to eliminate it.

The Opendoor layoffs in June 2026, which shut the company’s India office and affected roughly 250 employees, added another dimension. CEO Kaz Nejatian cited AI-native teams as the reason, suggesting that some US companies are using AI to reduce their reliance on Indian engineering talent at the same time that India is debating its reliance on American AI. The relationship is becoming less complementary and more competitive.

For now, the sovereign AI proposals remain proposals. Pai’s fund has no legislative vehicle, Vembu’s call for open-source adoption has no coordinated policy framework, and the IndiaAI Mission’s GPU deployment is still in early stages.

But the Anthropic suspension has done something that years of policy papers and conference speeches could not: it has given the sovereign AI movement a concrete, recent, and viscerally felt example of why dependence on foreign AI is a strategic liability. The debate is no longer theoretical.



Source link