Starting a smart home? Please don’t use Google Home


So you’ve decided to take your first steps towards building a smart home. The biggest hurdle ahead of you is deciding which platform you should use, and this likely depends on a few factors, like which ecosystems you’re already familiar with and comfortable using.

There are some good pointers out there about what you should use, but today we’re going to focus on a platform that might be best avoided: Google Home.

Google Home seems to be getting worse

Hey, Google, why don’t you work right anymore?

Google Home is the search giant’s own smart home platform, not to be confused with the smart speaker that Google since rebranded as Google Nest. It’s a proprietary, Google-flavored smart home ecosystem that competes directly with Amazon Alexa, Apple Home (also known as HomeKit), and Samsung SmartThings.

I’m going to lay my cards on the table right now: I use Home Assistant and Apple Home. I have a Google Nest mini smart speaker, which I’ve had for longer than I’ve been using Apple Home. My interest in Google’s smart home platform waned long before I set up my own system. I’m not a hater, I’m just not much of a fan.


Wear OS watch with Maps while driving


Gemini is failing at a basic Android task my phone nailed back in 2014

Don’t rely on Gemini to save your parking spot.

But it’s getting increasingly harder to ignore the complaints of Google Home users as time goes on. The most common complaint seems to be an overall decline in dependability, basic stuff like no longer being able to rely on the platform to action simple commands like turning on lights. Outlets like Android Authority picked up on this in 2025, prompting Chief Product Officer for Google Home and Nest, Anish Kattukaran, to acknowledge the growing discontent.

Many of the complaints come from Reddit, which is admittedly a place that many of us turn to in order to seek out help with problems or vent our frustrations. But even considering that the loudest voices in the room are those with grievances to air, the r/GoogleHome subreddit makes for particularly painful reading.

Many have attributed this loss in functionality to the killing off of Google Assistant. The sentiment that its replacement is inferior is shared by some Android writers at How-To Geek, and wavering enthusiasm might be to blame for Google backtracking on its original rollout plans.

Gemini, whether you like it or not

An assistant that’s a little too smart for basic smart home tasks

Gemini dumb mode on Pixel 10 Credit: Joe Fedewa / How-To Geek

Google introduced a new Home app in late 2025, redesigned around its Gemini chatbot. Even though Gemini seems to be eating ChatGPT’s lunch in the LLM wars, the reception among those who were previously happy with Google Assistant has been frosty.

Many of the complaints are prompted by the sort of quirky AI behaviors that we’ve come to expect from such models. For example, Gemini confidently told one user it can’t set alarms, despite this having been a core feature for years (and other commenters remarked that they could do this just fine).

There are other glitches like Gemini reporting that “6.20 am is in the past” when setting an alarm, and confidently claiming not to be able to play white noise on a smart speaker until the user encouraged the assistant to do so.

If you haven’t yet got Gemini and you’re curious, Google makes it somewhat difficult to switch back. You have to essentially create a new home in order to do this, whereas moving from Assistant to Gemini is a simple case of opting in.

Google is aware of these issues, even chiming in on some of these threads to ask for deeper feedback reports. But it hasn’t yet made significant changes to stem the flow of complaints from those who were quite happy with the way things used to work.

Matter support is the worst of the bunch

Google Home users miss out on the best part of modern smart homes

An assortment of boxes for several IKEA Matter products. Credit: Bertel King / How-To Geek

Matter is a smart home standard that is designed to foster interoperability between smart home platforms. The idea is that device manufacturers can design their products to be compatible with the Matter standard, and then companies like Google can implement that standard so that these devices can be used within these ecosystems.

While the dream of platform-agnostic smart home devices is an admirable one, the Matter vision has yet to fully materialize. Even if devices are compatible with your platform of choice, there’s no guarantee that all features will be implemented. For example, you might be able to turn a light bulb on or off, but to change its color, you’ll be limited to the manufacturer’s own app.

The current version of Matter is 1.5, which added support for cameras and closures like curtains (among other things). With each release of the standard, more devices become available, and older ones gain new abilities. This only works if the companies that have committed to Matter implement the latest version of the standard.

A quick glance at the Google Developer Center reveals that Google Home appears to still be on version 1.0 of the Matter standard, with limited support for some devices added in the 1.2 update. The fact that you can buy devices with the Matter logo on the box that won’t work with your supposedly Matter-compatible Google Home feels antithetical to the end goal.

Google Home is highly cloud-dependent

Bye bye, privacy

The Google Nest Mini on a table. Credit: Google

Even though Matter allows for Google’s hubs to work locally, the Google Home platform is still highly dependent on the cloud to function. The transition has been a slow one, and many devices out there that are designed for use with Google Home do not support Matter.

Google only made this switch in early 2025, whereas rival platform Apple Home (for all its flaws) was designed with local support from the outset. Better yet, Home Assistant is a truly open smart home platform that is built around the concept of local control and broad device support.

You only need to look at what happened to Amazon smart homes last year to see why using a platform that’s highly dependent on the cloud is a bad idea.


Avoid Google Home and build a smart home that truly serves you

So what should you use instead? Home Assistant is arguably the best alternative in terms of compatibility, local control, and platform agnosticism. Learn more about why you should give it a shot in 2026.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


When the original Range Rover debuted in 1970, it introduced something the automotive world had not quite seen before: a vehicle as capable on a muddy trail as it was parked outside a five-star hotel. That unique combination of rugged capability and refined luxury few, if any, SUVs can pull off today. Yet, Land Rover has been doing it for five decades.

The current fifth-generation model, which arrived for 2022, extended that tradition with a cabin that let the quality of its materials speak for itself.

Now, the 2027 Audi Q9 is preparing to challenge it.

The Q9 makes its world debut on July 28th and is Audi’s first true full-size flagship SUV. While the exterior remains under wraps, Audi recently opened the doors for a first look at the interior. What’s inside reveals two very different philosophies about where traditional luxury is headed. Audi is betting on screens, sensors, and immersive technology, while Range Rover, in a notable move for 2027, is bringing physical knobs and controls back to the center console.

One brand is leaning forward. The other is going for a hint of nostalgia. Here is how they stack up.

Two cabins, unique two philosophies

Small details for discerning buyers

The Range Rover has long built its interior reputation on what it leaves out as much as what it puts in.

The current model is characterized by a clean and streamlined dashboard with minimal distractions. Premium materials include Windsor leather on the SE, semi-aniline leather on the SV, and sustainably sourced wood veneers across the lineup.

For 2027, the physical volume knob and Terrain Response selector are returning to the center console, reversing a decision made for the 2024 model year that moved those controls to the touchscreen. It is a small detail that some discerning buyers will appreciate. Although every new vehicle today has a touchscreen of some kind, the allure of a large screen has its limits.

Audi takes the opposite position with the Q9. The cabin moves away from the fingerprint-prone piano-black trim of earlier models, introducing matte and textured finishes alongside new materials. Q9 buyers will find Dinamica microfiber, Nappa leather, fine-grain ash inlays, and a carbon fiber weave with basalt gray accents. New colors, including Tamarind Brown and Stone Beige, complete the palette.


Audi Q9


Audi’s Q9 challenges the Mercedes GLS with 4D audio and a digital cabin for 10K less

The primary difference between these two flagship SUVs lies in their digital architecture.

Digital Stage vs. Pivi Pro

Three displays or one interface

Audi’s Digital Stage includes three displays across the Q9’s dashboard. The primary OLED touchscreen is front and center, while a driver’s instrument cluster is tucked just beyond the steering wheel.

The third screen is separate for passengers and sure to be enjoyed on long road trips by whoever is sitting there. Front-seat passengers can stream content from their own queue, whether that’s a YouTube video, a show on Netflix, or a podcast playlist, without interfering with anything on the driver’s side.

Range Rover’s Pivi Pro system uses a 13.1-inch central touchscreen as its primary interface, paired with a 12-inch interactive driver display. The system is quick, organized, and accessible within two taps from the home screen. There is no dedicated front passenger display, though 11.4-inch rear seat entertainment screens are available on the Autobiography trim and above.

The dedicated passenger screen may give the Audi Q9 an edge over the Range Rover and other competitors like the Lexus LX, which also does not offer a separate infotainment screen. However, both the Lexus LX and Range Rover offer rear-seat entertainment.

The Mercedes-Benz GLS and Cadillac Escalade, other prime competitors to the Audi Q9, also offer a rear-seat entertainment system, in addition to the separate passenger screen.

At the time of this writing, Audi has not confirmed the availability of a rear seat entertainment system for the Q9. Given the nature of its competitors, however, it seems in Audi’s best interest to include it as an option.

And finally, the return of physical knobs to the Range Rover for 2027 is the sharpest contrast to the Q9’s all-screen approach. Audi is presenting a cabin where most functions require screen interaction. Range Rover, after trying the same approach, concluded its buyers prefer not to hunt through sub-menus for simple volume and terrain controls.


Audi Q9


Audi’s Q9 aims to replace the Cadillac Escalade as the new standard of tech luxury

Audi enthusiasts may bristle. Cadillac loyalists might feel the same. But nonetheless, here we are.

Sound systems and the sensory experience

Meridian versus Bang & Olufsen 4D

The Bang & Olufsen 4D sound system in the Q9 includes physical actuators built into the front seats so occupants can feel low-end frequencies, not just hear them. Audi’s Dynamic Interaction Light, an LED strip at the base of the windshield, syncs its color and rhythm to the music, with the color scheme matched to the track’s cover art. Headrest speakers route phone calls and navigation prompts privately to the driver.

Range Rover has a bespoke Meridian Signature Sound System, standard on the Autobiography and above, tuned specifically to the cabin’s acoustics. The SV and SV Ultra models offer a more advanced Meridian configuration, albeit without the seat actuator sensations.

Meanwhile, the Audi Q9 has a seven-seat layout as standard, with an optional six-seat configuration with power-adjustable captain’s chairs in the second row. The outer second-row seat slides and tilts forward to ease third-row access without removing child car seats. Audi also introduces an aluminum rail system in the trunk for securing cargo in three dimensions, and includes roof-rail crossbars as standard.

Range Rover’s Long Wheelbase seven-seat layout has been available since the current generation launched, with semi-aniline heated leather across all three rows as standard on the LWB SE. The Autobiography and SV trims add the aforementioned rear seat entertainment screens, a front-center console refrigerator, and four-zone climate control.

Uniden R8 Transparent Background

Display Type

OLED

Radar Band Detection

X, K, Ka

The Uniden R8 is a dual-antenna radar detector with directional arrows, known for its long-range detection and false alert filtering capabilities. Comes preloaded with red light and speed camera locations and supports firmware updates for ongoing performance enhancements.  


Electric doors and adaptive headlights

Where the Q9 pulls ahead

Three Q9 features have no direct equivalent in the current Range Rover.

All four doors on the Q9 open electronically at the push of a button, up to 90 degrees, with sensors that detect approaching cyclists. Drivers close them by pressing the brake pedal or fastening their seatbelt. Range Rover offers power doors on the SV trims, but Audi makes them standard across the entire Q9 lineup.

The Q9’s panoramic sunroof spans approximately 16 square feet and uses nine individually controllable glass segments that dim electronically. An optional LED package adds 84 lights inside the roof in up to 30 colors, matched to the cabin’s ambient lighting.

The Q9 also brings Digital Matrix LED headlights to U.S. customers for the first time. Using front-facing cameras, the system detects oncoming traffic and selectively masks the light around those vehicles, keeping maximum illumination everywhere else on the road.

According to a recent AAA survey, six in ten U.S. drivers struggle with headlight glare. Range Rover’s Pixel LED headlights, standard on the Autobiography and above, are excellent, but Audi’s matrix approach represents a meaningful step forward in lighting technology for U.S. buyers.


2027 Audi Q9 coming soon

The 2027 Range Rover SE starts at $113,300, with the Autobiography beginning at $159,200. The SV lineup starts at $219,500 and climbs to $275,000 for the Long Wheelbase SV Ultra.

The 2027 Audi Q9 is expected to start around $80,000, with higher trims landing between $90,000 and $95,000.

Audi will reveal the full Q9 details on July 28th, with North American deliveries expected as early as November.



Source link