This 15-in-1 docking station did more than add ports – it finally brought order to my desk


Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


Out of all the docking stations I’ve tested, the Baseus Spacemate RD1 Pro is one of the most unique, sporting features not commonly seen on other docks. 

Also: I tested the best laptop docking stations – here’s what I recommend for your office setup

It immediately distinguishes itself with an adjustable wireless charging pad on top and a small, high-resolution display on the front. What’s great is that these additions don’t feel like gimmicks; they deliver genuinely useful information for busy work setups, in addition to all the benefits of a high-end docking station.

Best desktops deals of the week

Deals are selected by the CNET Group commerce team, and may be unrelated to this article.

All the ports 

The Spacemate RD1 Pro is a fairly large docking station with an extensive array of ports and controls:

Front:

  • 2 × USB-C (up to 100W PD)
  • 2 × USB-A (5 Gbps)
  • 240 x 240 display with control button (resolution TBD)

Back:

  • 2 × USB-C (10 Gbps)
  • SD/TF card slot (V3.0)
  • 2 × USB-A (480 Mbps)
  • HDMI (up to 4K@60Hz)
  • HDMI (up to 4K@120Hz)
  • 1 Gigabit Ethernet
  • Full-featured USB-C host port
  • DC input (up to 100W PD)

Also: MacBook Neo vs. Acer Swift Air 14: I’ve used both budget laptops – this model clearly wins

It’s a fully-loaded docking station with fast USB ports for near-instant file transfers and a full-gigabit Ethernet connection for low-latency networking. For the average user, this is overkill, but for power users, I think it’s nearly perfect.

baseus-spacemate-rd1-pro-image-4

Cesar Cadenas/ZDNET

Something you may not notice at first glance is the heat vents, which are part of its cooling system. Spacemate RD1 uses a graphene-enhanced thermal structure along with vents to efficiently dissipate heat. In my experience, the cooling system does a fine job of keeping it cool. It got a little warm during testing, but never uncomfortably hot, and there were no signs of instability due to overheating.

Also: The best laptop cooling pads of 2026: Expert tested

What’s interesting about the dock is that it ships with two interchangeable power plugs: one for the US standard, the other for the European standard. Both attach by sliding over the adapter’s pegs on the front. I found the US plugs easy to remove: just press the button on top, and it slides off. 

The European plug, however, was surprisingly more difficult to detach. It uses the same release mechanism, but in my experience, it got stuck on the progs. I had to use a bit of elbow grease to remove.

baseus-spacemate-rd1-pro-image-5

Cesar Cadenas/ZDNET

For all its strengths, my biggest complaint about the Spacemate RD1 Pro is its power adapter. It’s huge; nearly half the size of the dock, and you can’t leave it behind. The device cannot operate off just power siphoned from a host laptop, it needs the adapter. Good luck finding a space for it. I actually had to unplug my desktop PC from a power strip during testing just to make room for both the adapter and my monitor’s power cable.

You don’t see this everyday 

By far the most eye-catching feature is the Qi 2.2 wireless magnetic charging pad on top. It delivers up to 25W of wireless charging power and can be positioned in one of three positions: completely flat, at roughly 45 degrees, or nearly upright. To get the most out of this pad, be sure your mobile device supports the Qi standard; otherwise, you’ll be waiting for a long time. I placed a 2026 Motorola Razr Ultra on top, which doesn’t support Qi2.2, and it took roughly four hours to reach 50% charge from a fully depleted battery.

After that, I placed an old iPhone 13 Mini (which supports Qi) on top, and the recharge time to 50% was nearly cut in half: 2 hours and 14 minutes, to be exact. It is possible to achieve higher speeds, provided your mobile device supports Qi 2.2.

baseus-spacemate-rd1-pro-image-6

Cesar Cadenas/ZDNET

These numbers were obtained while the Spacemate was in Charging Mode. In Charging Mode, nearly all of the device’s features are disabled except for charging. You can’t transfer files or output a video signal. If you press and hold the button above the display for two seconds, it switches over to Hybrid Mode.

Operational modes

Hybrid Mode is the default setting and enables all of the dock’s functionality. You can connect external displays, transfer files between devices, and charge connected hardware. However, charging performance is limited compared to Charging Mode since power is being distributed across multiple devices.

Also: The 10 coolest laptops we saw at Computex 2026 – Video

I wanted to see how the Spacemate RD1 Pro handled real-life workloads, specifically multi-monitor setups and file transfers. Unsurprisingly, the dock did great. It had no trouble driving high-resolution video signals. Text looked crisp on my HP Omen gaming monitor, colors looked accurate, and I didn’t encounter any strange flickering or weird visual artifacts. It even adjusted the aspect ratio of the laptop’s video signal to match the monitor’s.

File transfer performance was equally impressive. Moving a 22GB movie from a WD_Black SN770M SSD to my laptop took roughly 43 seconds, while a separate 85GB transfer finished in approximately two minutes and 30 seconds. 

baseus-spacemate-rd1-pro-image-7

Cesar Cadenas/ZDNET

One neat feature is the small 240 x 240 pixel RGB display on the front. It generates a visual map of your setup, detailing what is plugged in and how power is being distributed. You’ll see things like the setup’s host device, connected peripherals, active displays, and real-time power delivery.

Also: I trusted Malwarebytes to secure my PC for a month – here’s how it performed

Multi-monitor support varies depending on whether you’re using a Windows or Mac device. Windows users get the most flexibility, since they can mirror a laptop’s screen, extend the video signal across multiple monitors, or have each screen run an independent video signal. 

On macOS, you can only mirror content or extend the signal across the monitors, but you can’t have all three be independent from each other.

ZDNET’s buying advice

The Baseus Spacemate RD1 Pro is available from Amazon and Baseus for $300. To help soften the sticker shock, Baseus is currently offering a promotional discount on Amazon with the code BASEUSPR at checkout for $100 off. 

Overall, the Spacemate RD1 Pro is one of the better docking stations I’ve used, and certainly the most unique. It is a great combination of a generous port selection, thoughtful thermal management, and useful extras like its Qi2 wireless charging pad. If you’re looking for a more affordable alternative, consider the Baseus Nomos Air 12-in-1, with similar features, like the charging pad. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


TL;DR

Meta stripped NameTag facial recognition code from its AI app one day after WIRED exposed it on 50 million phones. Meta says no decision has been made.

Meta removed nearly all traces of an unreleased facial recognition system from its smart glasses companion app on Friday, one day after WIRED reported that the software had been quietly embedded in an app installed on more than 50 million phones. The feature, which Meta internally called NameTag, was designed to convert faces captured by the company’s Ray-Ban smart glasses into unique biometric signatures and compare them against a database stored on the user’s device. WIRED also found that faces the system failed to recognise were cropped, indexed, and stored locally for future processing.

Andy Stone, Meta’s vice president of communications, told WIRED on Monday that the feature is “purely exploratory,” adding that no final decision has been made on what to do with it. That characterisation sits uneasily with the evidence WIRED documented. The version of Meta AI published the day of WIRED’s Thursday report contained several code libraries explicitly named for face recognition, a process for running the NameTag recognition pipeline, and a “Person recognised” alert the app would have shown if someone were identified.

Friday’s release stripped all of it out, along with a folder where the app would have stored the cropped images and biometric signatures of unrecognised faces. Meta did not answer WIRED’s questions about why the code was removed or whether the changes were planned before the story was published. A few fragments remain in the latest version, including an internal debug menu label and a dormant link meant to open a recognised person’s profile, pointing to parts of the system that are no longer there.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The gap between Meta’s public statements and the code WIRED found is the central tension. Before the Thursday report, Stone dismissed the findings by writing that the company could not answer questions about how the system would work because “the feature does not exist.” Andrew Bosworth, Meta’s chief technology officer, called the reporting “incredibly misleading” and “absolutely dishonest.” Yet the code was functional enough to include three AI models, one to detect faces, another to crop them, and a third to encode them as biometric data, all embedded in the companion app for a product already at the centre of a mounting privacy crisis.

Meta declined to answer ten questions WIRED posed before publishing, including whether it had already created the database of face profiles NameTag uses, how long the app retains photographs and biometric data of unrecognised people, and whether that data would ever be sent back to Meta’s servers. The company also did not respond to questions about whether it was building NameTag for blind or low-vision users, or to criticism from privacy advocates who warned the system could let stalkers and abusers identify strangers in public.

NameTag first surfaced in February, when The New York Times, citing internal Meta documents, reported that the company was developing face recognition for its smart glasses and considering a launch as early as this year. One internal memo reportedly described releasing the feature during a “dynamic political environment” when privacy and civil liberties advocates would be distracted by other concerns. WIRED subsequently found that much of NameTag’s machinery had been built into the Meta AI app as early as January, months before any public acknowledgement, adding another layer to the company’s pattern of shipping first and disclosing later when it comes to its smart glasses.

Kade Crockford, director of the technology for liberty programme at the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, said the removal does not undo the original decision to ship the code and pointed to it as evidence that consumer privacy needs stronger legal protection than Congress has been willing to provide. The Massachusetts House of Representatives last week unanimously passed a consumer privacy bill that, if enacted as written, would impose strong enforcement provisions including a private right of action allowing aggrieved users to sue. “State lawmakers need to do their job and step up to protect consumer privacy,” Crockford said.

Meta’s sneaky tactics in slipping the face-recognition code into its smart glasses show exactly why data privacy bills need the teeth of strong enforcement,” Crockford added. “Companies like Meta prioritise their bottom line, so lawmakers need to speak in the only language its C-suite understands.” Whether a code removal prompted by investigative reporting constitutes a victory or merely a tactical retreat depends on what Meta does next, and on whether the regulatory pressure building on both sides of the Atlantic produces enforceable consequences before the feature quietly returns under a different name.



Source link