New Zero-Day Unlocks BitLocker in Four Hours of Research


Chaotic Eclipse Strikes Again: New Zero-Day Unlocks BitLocker in Four Hours of Research

Pierluigi Paganini
June 11, 2026

GreatXML bypasses BitLocker via Defender offline scan artifacts, giving SYSTEM shell in Recovery Mode. No patch exists. Any machine that ran an offline scan is vulnerable.

On June 10, security researcher Chaotic Eclipse (aka Nightmare Eclipse) published a new working exploit dubbed GreatXML that bypasses BitLocker and opens a command shell with full SYSTEM privileges while Windows is in Recovery Mode. It came one day after RoguePlanet, an exploit targeting Microsoft Defender that leads to local privilege escalation.

“This was an accidental discovery, it took a total of 4 hours to find this.” wrote. “If you ever attempted to use Windows Defender Offline Scan, you’re automatically vulnerable to a bitlocker bypass. I’m unsure if you can still trigger the bug without ever using the offline scan feature, because you can definitely”

At this pace, Microsoft’s patch team is essentially playing whack-a-mole with someone who has a very long list and no intention of slowing down.

The technical mechanism is straightforward. Microsoft Defender’s offline scan feature, which reboots the system into Windows Recovery Environment (WinRE) to scan for malware outside the running OS, leaves behind configuration artifacts that persist on the recovery partition.

GreatXML exploits the way WinRE processes XML files during the boot sequence.

“If defender offline scan was initiated in the victim machine at any point then there is no need to login, the machine is automatically vulnerable.” reads the PoC description. “You will have to copy “unattend.xml” and “Recovery” directory to the root of the recovery partition then reboot to WinRE using shift + click on restart button, if everything was done correctly, a shell with unrestricted access to the bitlocker volume will spawn.”

The result is a shell with unrestricted access to the BitLocker-protected volume, rendered in two screenshots posted to the GitHub repo.

The attack requires brief physical access to the target machine, or the ability to write to the recovery partition through any other means. An attacker who can touch the machine for the time it takes to copy two files has everything they need, provided the target ever ran a Defender offline scan. That’s not a rare condition. Defender prompts users to run offline scans regularly, particularly after detecting threats it couldn’t remove while Windows was running.

The researcher noted one limitation: the exploit path is easier if Microsoft Defender Offline Scan has already been used. If it hasn’t, an attacker may need to start the scan manually or find another way to boot the system into the required recovery mode. Nightmare Eclipse said they haven’t fully investigated all possible methods and are not currently interested in doing so, leaving some questions unanswered.

“If defender offline scan was never initiated then you have to either login and initiate it yourself or figure out a way to boot into WinRE in offline scan state (I believe it should be very possible to do so without logging in) and follow steps above” continues the description.

The researcher admits he doesn’t fully understand all the conditions needed to trigger the issue and say they aren’t currently interested in digging deeper, which is not very reassuring. At the time of this writing, GreatXML has no patch yet.

GreatXML is the latest vulnerability disclosed by researcher Chaotic Eclipse, following BlueHammer (CVE-2026-33825), UnDefend (CVE-2026-45498), and RedSun (CVE-2026-41091). The disclosures are believed to stem from a dispute with Microsoft over the vulnerability reporting process.

This week, Chaotic Eclipse released a PoC for the RoguePlanet Microsoft Defender zero-day, which can grant SYSTEM privileges on fully patched Windows systems.

In May, the researcher disclosed two other Windows zero-day vulnerabilities named YellowKey and GreenPlasma. The flaws affect BitLocker and the Windows Collaborative Translation Framework (CTFMON). YellowKey could allow attackers to bypass BitLocker protections, while GreenPlasma enables privilege escalation. The researcher previously disclosed three Microsoft Defender vulnerabilities.

The researcher criticized Microsoft for revoking access to their MSRC account, rejecting reports, and failing to provide compensation.

At the end of May, Microsoft’s Security Response Center called the zero-day dumps irresponsible.

“In recent weeks several zero-day vulnerabilities have been publicly disclosed.” reads the report published by Microsoft. “The details of these vulnerabilities were not shared with Microsoft prior to release, and the disclosures put our customers at unnecessary risk.”

The company said its security teams have been working around the clock since the disclosures to understand the impact, build patches, and protect customers from attackers who picked up the published exploit code and ran with it.

Microsoft’s post is essentially a public defense of Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure, the standard practice where a researcher notifies a vendor privately, gives them time to fix the issue, and then goes public. Microsoft says it works with hundreds of researchers this way every year, compensating them through bug bounty programs and crediting them publicly.

“This partnership allows us to make updates to impacted services before proof-of-concept code can make it into the hands of bad actors.” continues the report. “The vulnerabilities known as RedSunUnDefendBlueHammerYellowKey, GreenPlasma, and MiniPlasma were not responsibly disclosed.” 

The implication is clear: when someone skips that step, real people get attacked with real tools built from the published research.

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, Nightmare Eclipse)







Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Robot mowers on a yard

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


The perfect robot mower for you is not nearly as fancy and feature-heavy as you may think. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: it’s not the lawn mower, it’s all about the yard. A robot mower may be a market leader with top-of-the-line specs and still not be a good fit for your yard.

Here’s the great news: There’s a perfect robot mower for almost any yard. As someone who’s tested numerous types of robot lawn mowers, I’ve learned that many of the specs that brands market as groundbreaking are simply not vital for most shoppers. A mostly flat, fenced-in 0.10-acre yard doesn’t need the power that a hilly, sectioned, unfenced one-acre yard does.

Also: I tested the Ferrari of robot mowers for a month – here’s my verdict

If you’re looking to choose the best mower for your home, be sure to check out ZDNET’s robot mower buying guide

Here’s what you don’t need to stress over when buying a robot mower

Eufy E15 Robot Mower

Maria Diaz/ZDNET
For yards with… Best robot mower type Examples
No fences A wired boundary is best, but a great GPS/RTK robot mower can stick to the map you make with it. Yardcare E400, Mammotion Luba 3
Fences A LiDAR robot mower that can be dropped to mow with little setup and learn its map as it navigates. Eufy E15, Ecovacs Goat A3000
A lot of trees A LiDAR or wired boundary mower, since trees can interfere with satellite signals. Husqvarna iQ series (optional wire, EPOS)
Unbordered garden beds A GPS/RTK robot mower that you can set up to avoid flower beds when mapping. Mammotion Luba 3, Husqvarna iQ Series
Bordered garden beds A LiDAR, GPS, or wired boundary robot mower works for these yards. If you choose a wired boundary, you may have to bury wire around the flower beds, unless the borders are tall enough for the mower to avoid. Mammotion Yuka, Navimow Series H
pets A LiDAR robot mower that can adjust its navigation in real-time in reaction to its surroundings. Mova LiDAX Ultra 2000, Segway Navimow i2
Hills and uneven terrain An AWD robot mower capable of handling steep slopes, regardless of the navigation type. Mammotion Luba 3, , Husqvarna iQ

1. Don’t focus on: ‘AI-powered’ or other marketing buzzwords

Segway Navimow X3 Series robot mower

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Artificial intelligence (AI) has surpassed the popularity of acid-wash jeans in the 80s and Baby G watches in the early 2000s. And tech companies — including robot lawn mower manufacturers — are capitalizing on its appeal.

Most of these “AI-powered” or “intelligent mowing” terms are vague, geared to grab shoppers’ attention with buzzwords. That doesn’t mean that the robots don’t use AI to navigate, however. 

The key is to find out how the robot uses AI to its benefit, and whether that will meet your AI expectations. 

Also: This robot mower took care of my lawn for months – and it’s currently $300 off

AI algorithms typically process data captured by the robot’s hardware to help it make quick decisions and adjustments. For example, a robot lawn mower may have a set of sensors and cameras to capture its surroundings. The robot’s processor then uses AI to convert that information into actionable data, so it knows whether to swerve to avoid an obstacle or slow down around a retaining wall.

Instead, look for: The navigation tech under (and on) the hood

Instead of AI and other buzzwords, you should focus on matching the robot lawn mower’s hardware and navigation system to your yard. This includes whether the robot uses RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) for positioning, and whether it features LiDAR, cameras, and sensors. 

Then look at real user reviews to assess how accurately the robot mower maps and how well it performs around various types of obstacles.

There’s no blanket rule for robot mowers, but most do well with the following guidelines.

2. Don’t focus on: Premium extras

Yardcare E400 robot lawn mower

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Skip the premium extras that don’t match your yard. You really don’t need the most advanced robot mower; you need the one that will best handle your lawn. 

Most US homeowners have mostly flat lawns, simple rectangular layouts, minimal obstacles, and small yards. Yet some of the most popular mowers advertise features that don’t match this, and you don’t want to spend an extra few hundred dollars on advanced features that won’t deliver a noticeable difference in your yard.

Instead, look for: Only as much as you need

Do you have a mostly flat lawn with no fences and need a robot that can navigate to several sections separated by paths? Then you can skip AWD models and commit to superior mapping and navigation features, like multi-zone intelligence.

Also: I let a modular yard care robot mow my lawn – here’s my verdict after a month

Similarly, if you have a yard with dense trees covering most of it, it’s safe to skip the RTK models and go for LiDAR or boundary wire options instead. 

3. Don’t focus on: Flashy app features

Mammotion Luba 2 robot mower path

The path lines created by the Mammotion Luba 2, as captured by our Bink Outdoor camera, is one flashy app feature I can’t quit.

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Any dependable robot lawn mower requires an equally reliable mobile app to let you use it effectively. However, manufacturers market many flashy app features that end up being unnecessary for many users. 

Don’t make app features the deciding factor unless it’s something you genuinely care about. Many users don’t rely on voice control to run their mowers and don’t mind using a separate app for their robot rather than integrating it into an existing home automation system.

Also: I let a smart planter maintain itself for 2 months – here’s the result

A robot lawn mower with mediocre navigation and cutting performance can still have a flashy app — all while leaving behind missed patches or taking longer to finish mowing.

Instead, look for: The features you’ll actually use

Most robot mower users keep them running on a schedule to get the lawn-cutting chore off their minds. The majority of the most popular models offer basic features beyond scheduling, such as remote start and stop, basic mapping, automatic rain delay, and theft protection. 

It’s easy to find robot lawn mowers with these features, but if you’re looking for anything beyond that, just be sure that the feature is worth it, especially if you’re paying extra for that model.

Also: I’ve tested robot mowers for years – here’s my expert advice for every yard type

An example of a flashy app feature that is completely unnecessary, but I love having? The Mammotion’s pattern cutting. I can select the cutting pattern I want on the Mammotion app, whether I want lines or checkered, but I can also have the robot cut in custom patterns, like letters and numbers. I don’t care for mowed letters in my yard, but I like that it always has that freshly mowed checkered patterned with no effort from me. 

4. Don’t focus on: Cutting system extras

Segway Navimow X3 Series robot mower

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

The cutting width and system specs are important, as they can determine whether a robot can cover a given area in a day. However, most robot mowers use similar multiple-blade mulching systems. 

Unlike traditional lawn mowers with large blades for aggressive cutting in a single pass, robot mowers typically feature a set of small blades that constantly spin. Because of this, robot mowers trim smaller amounts of grass with each pass than a traditional mower, but they also cut more frequently and leave behind smaller grass clippings that decompose naturally.

Also: I powered my 3,000-sq-ft home with an EcoFlow battery in a blackout – here’s how it kept my AC on

Because the robot mowers have a smaller, compounding cutting system, the real-world differences between the cutting systems from one brand to another are often smaller than you’d expect. Other issues, like poor navigation, will be glaringly obvious before small differences in blade design.

Instead, look for: Cutting width and yard size

The average US yard would benefit more from navigation quality, consistency, and connectivity than blade design. Instead, you should focus on matching the mower to your yard size.

The robot’s capacity is measured in how many acres it can cover in a day. Among other features, this is calculated based on your robot’s battery size and cutting width. Essentially, most users want a robot that can mow an entire yard in a day, so you can set it and forget it and always come home to a mowed yard. You get this by getting the appropriate robot for your yard size.





Source link