Russian APTs Still Exploiting Patched WinRAR Flaw CVE-2025-8088


Russian APTs Still Exploiting Patched WinRAR Flaw CVE-2025-8088

Pierluigi Paganini
June 10, 2026

Despite a 2025 patch, Russian-linked groups still exploit a WinRAR flaw (CVE-2025-8088) to deploy malware via phishing archives.

CVE-2025-8088 is a path traversal flaw in WinRAR that lets an attacker write files outside the extraction directory using NTFS Alternate Data Streams. WinRAR fixed it in version 7.13 in July 2025. Nearly a year later, Trend Micro researchers published an analysis showing two separate Russia-linked APT groups, Earth Dahu (aka Gamaredon) and SHADOW-EARTH-066 (UAC-0226), are still actively building new exploit samples and delivering fresh lure documents through it. The patch exists. The installations don’t have it.

The mechanics of the flaw are worth understanding precisely. Victims receive a RAR archive, typically via spear-phishing email. They open it and see a decoy PDF, something that looks like a Ukrainian court summons, a Ministry of Defense registry, or a military equipment manifest designed to create urgency.

In the background, with no warning and no additional user interaction, WinRAR silently writes hidden files to locations outside the extraction directory, including the Windows Startup folder. On the next login, those files execute automatically.

“WinRAR is deeply embedded in daily operations across Ukrainian organizations, making it an attractive target for exploitation. CVE-2025-8088 is a path traversal flaw (CVSS 8.4), patched in WinRAR 7.13 in July 2025, that allows an attacker to silently write files outside the extraction directory via NTFS Alternate Data Streams.” reads the report published by Trend Micro “Once the victim opens the archive, no further interaction is needed; they see only a decoy document. All the samples we analyzed exploit this vulnerability.”

SHADOW-EARTH-066’s current campaign represents a significant technical upgrade from its 2025 operations. The group originally used Excel macro droppers with hardcoded Telegram bot tokens in plaintext, a method that was trivially detectable.

The latest build, timestamped April 9, 2026, drops three hidden files via path traversal: an LNK shortcut into the Startup folder, a heavily obfuscated PowerShell loader into C:\ProgramData\, and a SUB-encoded DLL payload into the same directory. The PowerShell loader uses direct NT system calls to load the final DLL entirely in memory, never writing the decoded payload to disk, making file-based detection ineffective.

The final payload, internally named result.dll, is a direct evolution of GIFTEDCROOK and targets Chrome, Edge, Opera, and Firefox. It decrypts browser master keys, extracts passwords and session cookies, bypasses Chrome’s App-Bound Encryption, and scans Documents, Downloads, and TEMP directories for 35 file extensions covering documents, spreadsheets, presentations, KeePass databases, and OpenVPN config files. After exfiltrating everything to dedicated C2 servers via dual-layer RC4-encrypted HTTPS, it deletes all three staging artifacts from disk. One-shot execution, no persistence left behind.

The stealer operates as a one-shot execution. After cleanup, no startup mechanism and no staging files remain on the endpoint. continues the report.

WinRAR Flaw CVE-2025-8088

The shift from Telegram to dedicated C2 servers isn’t just a technical upgrade. In February 2026, Russia moved toward blocking Telegram domestically, which made hardcoded Telegram tokens increasingly unreliable as an exfiltration channel for operators working from Russian-adjacent infrastructure. The new C2 servers, seven IPs hosted on a Malaysian VPS provider with points of presence in France, the Netherlands, and Switzerland, communicate on non-standard high ports and all use the same URI path /rcv/, indicating shared server-side tooling across the campaign’s builds.

Earth Dahu’s approach is structurally different but uses the same entry point. Rather than a multi-file compiled stealer chain, Gamaredon drops a single HTA or VBScript file into the Startup folder via the same CVE-2025-8088 path traversal. On the next login, mshta.exe executes the HTA, which loads VBScript from external resources hosted through Cloudflare Workers and Dynamic DNS, then delivers espionage modules depending on the target.

“Since at least September 2025, Earth Dahu has also incorporated CVE-2025-8088 into its operations.” continues the report. “We first reported on this adoption in a private intelligence report distributed through TrendAI Vision One™︎ in December 2025, when Earth Dahu used the vulnerability with an HTA-to-VBScript infection chain that delivered espionage modules. Based on RAR internal file timestamps and file naming conventions, the chain remained active through at least April 10, 2026.”

ClearSky has also reported a wiper component delivered through the same chain.

Earth Dahu’s spear-phishing emails show operational sophistication at the delivery layer. Many were sent from compromised accounts on Ukrainian government Exchange servers, with one cluster showing four separate accounts originating from the same internal IP, pointing to a single compromised workstation distributing email through multiple mailboxes. The C2 URLs embedded in HTA files use HTTP basic-auth @-notation to spoof legitimate domains: a URL structured as hxxps://ssu[.]gov[.]ua@malicious[.]workers[.]dev displays the Security Service of Ukraine’s domain to the left of the @ while routing traffic to the attacker’s Cloudflare Workers subdomain. Spoofed domains span Ukrainian government sites, major news outlets, the BBC, and Deutsche Welle.

The two campaigns share an entry point but nothing else. SHADOW-EARTH-066 uses compiled C++ with static libcurl, direct NT syscalls, and direct IP-based C2. Earth Dahu uses script-based tooling, HTA and VBScript, proxied through Cloudflare Workers. No shared infrastructure connects them. Both decided independently that CVE-2025-8088 was worth building around.

The reason both keep using it is structural. WinRAR doesn’t auto-update. It’s not covered by Group Policy or centralized enterprise patch management like WSUS, SCCM, or Intune. Verifying patch status across an organization requires third-party tooling or manual auditing. This is exactly the profile threat actors look for: widely installed, infrequently updated, outside standard patch channels. CVE-2018-20250, a WinRAR vulnerability disclosed in 2018, was still showing up in targeted attacks years later. The pattern repeats.

“Despite CVE-2025-8088 was patched in WinRAR 7.13 in July 2025, yet at the time of writing, multiple threat actor groups continued to build new exploit samples with fresh lure documents and use this vulnerability as a reliable initial access vector against Ukrainian organizations.” concludes the report. “The convergence of both established state-backed groups and independently tracked clusters on a single vulnerability reflects the scale of the cyber threats that Ukraine faces.”

Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon

Pierluigi Paganini

(SecurityAffairs – hacking, newsletter)







Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Robot mowers on a yard

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


The perfect robot mower for you is not nearly as fancy and feature-heavy as you may think. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: it’s not the lawn mower, it’s all about the yard. A robot mower may be a market leader with top-of-the-line specs and still not be a good fit for your yard.

Here’s the great news: There’s a perfect robot mower for almost any yard. As someone who’s tested numerous types of robot lawn mowers, I’ve learned that many of the specs that brands market as groundbreaking are simply not vital for most shoppers. A mostly flat, fenced-in 0.10-acre yard doesn’t need the power that a hilly, sectioned, unfenced one-acre yard does.

Also: I tested the Ferrari of robot mowers for a month – here’s my verdict

If you’re looking to choose the best mower for your home, be sure to check out ZDNET’s robot mower buying guide

Here’s what you don’t need to stress over when buying a robot mower

Eufy E15 Robot Mower

Maria Diaz/ZDNET
For yards with… Best robot mower type Examples
No fences A wired boundary is best, but a great GPS/RTK robot mower can stick to the map you make with it. Yardcare E400, Mammotion Luba 3
Fences A LiDAR robot mower that can be dropped to mow with little setup and learn its map as it navigates. Eufy E15, Ecovacs Goat A3000
A lot of trees A LiDAR or wired boundary mower, since trees can interfere with satellite signals. Husqvarna iQ series (optional wire, EPOS)
Unbordered garden beds A GPS/RTK robot mower that you can set up to avoid flower beds when mapping. Mammotion Luba 3, Husqvarna iQ Series
Bordered garden beds A LiDAR, GPS, or wired boundary robot mower works for these yards. If you choose a wired boundary, you may have to bury wire around the flower beds, unless the borders are tall enough for the mower to avoid. Mammotion Yuka, Navimow Series H
pets A LiDAR robot mower that can adjust its navigation in real-time in reaction to its surroundings. Mova LiDAX Ultra 2000, Segway Navimow i2
Hills and uneven terrain An AWD robot mower capable of handling steep slopes, regardless of the navigation type. Mammotion Luba 3, , Husqvarna iQ

1. Don’t focus on: ‘AI-powered’ or other marketing buzzwords

Segway Navimow X3 Series robot mower

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Artificial intelligence (AI) has surpassed the popularity of acid-wash jeans in the 80s and Baby G watches in the early 2000s. And tech companies — including robot lawn mower manufacturers — are capitalizing on its appeal.

Most of these “AI-powered” or “intelligent mowing” terms are vague, geared to grab shoppers’ attention with buzzwords. That doesn’t mean that the robots don’t use AI to navigate, however. 

The key is to find out how the robot uses AI to its benefit, and whether that will meet your AI expectations. 

Also: This robot mower took care of my lawn for months – and it’s currently $300 off

AI algorithms typically process data captured by the robot’s hardware to help it make quick decisions and adjustments. For example, a robot lawn mower may have a set of sensors and cameras to capture its surroundings. The robot’s processor then uses AI to convert that information into actionable data, so it knows whether to swerve to avoid an obstacle or slow down around a retaining wall.

Instead, look for: The navigation tech under (and on) the hood

Instead of AI and other buzzwords, you should focus on matching the robot lawn mower’s hardware and navigation system to your yard. This includes whether the robot uses RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) for positioning, and whether it features LiDAR, cameras, and sensors. 

Then look at real user reviews to assess how accurately the robot mower maps and how well it performs around various types of obstacles.

There’s no blanket rule for robot mowers, but most do well with the following guidelines.

2. Don’t focus on: Premium extras

Yardcare E400 robot lawn mower

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Skip the premium extras that don’t match your yard. You really don’t need the most advanced robot mower; you need the one that will best handle your lawn. 

Most US homeowners have mostly flat lawns, simple rectangular layouts, minimal obstacles, and small yards. Yet some of the most popular mowers advertise features that don’t match this, and you don’t want to spend an extra few hundred dollars on advanced features that won’t deliver a noticeable difference in your yard.

Instead, look for: Only as much as you need

Do you have a mostly flat lawn with no fences and need a robot that can navigate to several sections separated by paths? Then you can skip AWD models and commit to superior mapping and navigation features, like multi-zone intelligence.

Also: I let a modular yard care robot mow my lawn – here’s my verdict after a month

Similarly, if you have a yard with dense trees covering most of it, it’s safe to skip the RTK models and go for LiDAR or boundary wire options instead. 

3. Don’t focus on: Flashy app features

Mammotion Luba 2 robot mower path

The path lines created by the Mammotion Luba 2, as captured by our Bink Outdoor camera, is one flashy app feature I can’t quit.

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Any dependable robot lawn mower requires an equally reliable mobile app to let you use it effectively. However, manufacturers market many flashy app features that end up being unnecessary for many users. 

Don’t make app features the deciding factor unless it’s something you genuinely care about. Many users don’t rely on voice control to run their mowers and don’t mind using a separate app for their robot rather than integrating it into an existing home automation system.

Also: I let a smart planter maintain itself for 2 months – here’s the result

A robot lawn mower with mediocre navigation and cutting performance can still have a flashy app — all while leaving behind missed patches or taking longer to finish mowing.

Instead, look for: The features you’ll actually use

Most robot mower users keep them running on a schedule to get the lawn-cutting chore off their minds. The majority of the most popular models offer basic features beyond scheduling, such as remote start and stop, basic mapping, automatic rain delay, and theft protection. 

It’s easy to find robot lawn mowers with these features, but if you’re looking for anything beyond that, just be sure that the feature is worth it, especially if you’re paying extra for that model.

Also: I’ve tested robot mowers for years – here’s my expert advice for every yard type

An example of a flashy app feature that is completely unnecessary, but I love having? The Mammotion’s pattern cutting. I can select the cutting pattern I want on the Mammotion app, whether I want lines or checkered, but I can also have the robot cut in custom patterns, like letters and numbers. I don’t care for mowed letters in my yard, but I like that it always has that freshly mowed checkered patterned with no effort from me. 

4. Don’t focus on: Cutting system extras

Segway Navimow X3 Series robot mower

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

The cutting width and system specs are important, as they can determine whether a robot can cover a given area in a day. However, most robot mowers use similar multiple-blade mulching systems. 

Unlike traditional lawn mowers with large blades for aggressive cutting in a single pass, robot mowers typically feature a set of small blades that constantly spin. Because of this, robot mowers trim smaller amounts of grass with each pass than a traditional mower, but they also cut more frequently and leave behind smaller grass clippings that decompose naturally.

Also: I powered my 3,000-sq-ft home with an EcoFlow battery in a blackout – here’s how it kept my AC on

Because the robot mowers have a smaller, compounding cutting system, the real-world differences between the cutting systems from one brand to another are often smaller than you’d expect. Other issues, like poor navigation, will be glaringly obvious before small differences in blade design.

Instead, look for: Cutting width and yard size

The average US yard would benefit more from navigation quality, consistency, and connectivity than blade design. Instead, you should focus on matching the mower to your yard size.

The robot’s capacity is measured in how many acres it can cover in a day. Among other features, this is calculated based on your robot’s battery size and cutting width. Essentially, most users want a robot that can mow an entire yard in a day, so you can set it and forget it and always come home to a mowed yard. You get this by getting the appropriate robot for your yard size.





Source link