Legora opens Madrid, Milan, Paris offices, London engineering hub


TL;DR

Legora, the $5.6bn legal AI platform, is opening offices in Madrid, Milan, and Paris and building a London engineering hub, targeting 700 EMEA employees within a year. Current headcount and revenue are undisclosed.

Legora, the agentic AI platform for legal professionals, is opening offices in Madrid, Milan, and Paris during Q3 2026, alongside a dedicated engineering hub in London. Hiring across all four locations has begun, with the company targeting a combined EMEA headcount of 700 within the next six to 12 months.

The expansion follows a $600 million Series D in April that valued Legora at $5.6 billion, with Nvidia’s NVentures and Atlassian among the new investors. The company now serves more than 100,000 users at over 1,200 law firms and in-house legal teams across more than 50 markets.

Why these four cities

Spain, Italy, and France were among the earliest European markets to adopt Legora at scale. The company had significant customer traction in all three countries before it had any physical presence there.

Our customers in these countries have built Legora into the way they work,” said CEO and co-founder Max Junestrand. The new offices will house customer success, go-to-market, and legal engineering teams.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

London as the third engineering pillar

The London hub will join existing engineering centres in Stockholm and New York, giving Legora continuous development capacity across three time zones. Junestrand said London’s AI talent pool is shaped by proximity to demanding professional services firms.

People here have built things that have to perform under real legal and regulatory constraints,” he said. “That’s a different problem from building a consumer product.” UK AI Minister Kanishka Narayan called the hub “a major vote of confidence in the UK’s AI capabilities.

The competitive landscape

Legora competes primarily with Harvey AI, which was valued at $11 billion in its most recent round. The legal AI market has attracted record capital in 2026, with both companies racing to convert law firm adoption into enterprise-wide platform lock-in.

Legora’s customer list includes Linklaters, White & Case, Cleary Gottlieb, Dentons, Deloitte, and Goodwin. Its platform handles research, review, and drafting across complex matters using agentic workflows that automate entire legal processes rather than assisting with individual tasks.

The scale question

The four new locations bring Legora’s global footprint to 16 cities across four continents, joining Stockholm, London, Munich, New York, Denver, Chicago, Houston, San Francisco, Toronto, Bengaluru, Sydney, Singapore, and Tokyo. Going from its current EMEA headcount to 700 in six to 12 months is aggressive.

The company has not disclosed its current total employee count or EMEA headcount, so the baseline for the 700-employee target is unclear. Revenue figures have not been made public. Legora’s expansion is funded by its $600 million round, but whether the legal AI market sustains the hiring velocity both Legora and Harvey are pursuing will depend on whether law firm adoption translates to durable, recurring revenue at the rates their valuations imply.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


“It was severely downgraded,” Gilbert confirms. “I never would have found it if I was just looking through Google results.” (I tried the same prompt in Gemini earlier this month, and after an initial denial, the tool also gave me Eiger’s number.)

After this experience, Eiger, Gilbert, and another UW PhD student, Anna-Maria Gueorguieva, decided to test ChatGPT to see what it would surface about a professor. 

At first, OpenAI’s guardrails kicked in, and ChatGPT responded that the information was unavailable. But in the same response, the chatbot suggested, “if you want to go deeper, I can still try a more ‘investigative-style’ approach.” Their inquiry just had to help “narrow things down,” ChatGPT said, by providing “a neighborhood guess” for where the professor might live, or “a possible co-owner name” for the professor’s home. ChatGPT continued: “That’s usually the only way to surface newer or intentionally less-visible property records.” 

The students provided this information, leading ChatGPT to produce the professor’s home address, home purchase price, and spouse’s name from city property records. 

(Taya Christianson, an OpenAI representative, said she was not able to comment on what happened in this case without seeing screenshots or knowing which model the students had tested, even after we pointed out that many users may not know which model they were using in the ChatGPT interface. She also declined to comment generally about the exposure of PII by the chatbot, instead providing links to documents describing how OpenAI handles privacy, including filtering out PII, and other tools.) 

This reveals one of the fundamental problems with chatbots, says DeleteMe’s Shavell. AI companies “can build in guardrails, but [their chatbots] are also designed to be effective and to answer customer questions.”

The exposure issue is not limited to Gemini or ChatGPT. Last year, Futurism found that if you prompted xAI’s chatbot Grok with “[name] address,” in almost all cases, it provided not only residential addresses but also often the person’s phone numbers, work addresses, and addresses for people with similar-sounding names. (xAI did not respond to a request for comment.) 

No clear answers

There aren’t straightforward solutions to this problem—there’s no easy way to either verify whether someone’s personal information is in a given model’s training set or to compel the models to remove PII. 



Source link