I fixed my Wi-Fi dead zones without drilling a single hole—and it only cost $25


Most people are told never to use a Wi-Fi extender, and in most situations, that’s sound advice. Many Wi-Fi extenders cut your bandwidth in half, increase latency, can interfere with your main router’s Wi-Fi signal, can be unreliable, often have limited range, and are usually the worst way to extend Wi-Fi to dead spots in your home.

But when I needed to provide Wi-Fi coverage for my mom’s house about a year ago, I opted for a Wi-Fi extender, and it ultimately proved to be the right choice. Here’s why.

I had a unique problem on my hands

My mom needed Wi-Fi

A router on a wooden table with a Wi-Fi icon, a pineapple next to it, and several skull icons around it. Credit: Lucas Gouveia/How-To Geek | Pixel-Shot/Shutterstock

My mom and my uncle (her brother) live in a small village in two different houses that share the same yard. While my uncle’s house has a landline, my mom’s doesn’t, and neither house has access to cable TV or internet.

For years, they used a 20Mbps DSL connection, which was enough for them because they’re anything but demanding. The router was located in my uncle’s living room, the room closest to my mom’s house, so she had a solid Wi-Fi signal that topped out at about 10Mbps and covered the rooms where she needed internet access—the kitchen, dining room, and bedroom—quite well.

But about a year and change ago, my cousin, who lives in the same village, managed to negotiate a deal for them with a local ISP that offered fixed wireless internet. They would get a 50Mbps plan that was cheaper than their 20Mbps DSL service, which sounded great. So the technicians came, installed the antenna on the roof of my uncle’s house (it’s a two-story house, while my mom lives in a one-story house), drilled through the floors to route the cable down to the ground floor, and installed the router there.

The catch was that, for some reason, they placed the router right smack in the middle of the dining room, which is the room farthest from my mom’s house. That was too far for the router’s Wi-Fi signal to reach her house reliably. She had to step outside to get a usable signal, which was less than ideal, to say the least.

Since the router couldn’t be moved without us drilling a few more holes through concrete walls, I had a couple of options on the table for extending Wi-Fi to my mom’s house that didn’t involve such drastic measures.

I decided to try a Wi-Fi extender and see how it goes

It couldn’t hurt, right?

For starters, I couldn’t run an Ethernet cable to my mom’s house or close enough to it to install an access point that could provide Wi-Fi coverage, because that would have required drilling multiple holes through thick concrete walls. As I’ve already said, moving the router was also out of the question, and we agreed to use that option only as a last resort if nothing else worked.

Buying a mesh system was one possibility, but before going that route, I decided to try a universally hated Wi-Fi extender. It couldn’t hurt to give it a shot, and I could get one for about $25. So I went out and bought a budget single-band (2.4GHz) Tenda Wi-Fi extender. I came back and set it up, which was a breeze thanks to the mobile app. But when I went to my mom’s house to plug it in, I ran into a problem: the router’s Wi-Fi signal was too weak inside her house for the extender to pick up, so I had to improvise.

Her house is attached to a garage-slash-summer kitchen that they use for their only car, cooking during the warmer months, and storing a large freezer. The garage receives a serviceable signal from the router and has multiple power outlets, so I grabbed an extension cord, hung it around a structural beam, and plugged in the extender. And what do you know, it worked. The signal was strong enough to deliver about 15Mbps to her house, even though the signal light glowed yellow rather than green, indicating that the router’s signal wasn’t particularly strong.

Testing the signal around her house showed that the extender was handling everything without a hitch. Even in my old room, which is the farthest from the garage, the signal was stable and delivered the same 15Mbps throughput.

So I went back home and left her with the extender to test it for a few weeks. If things went south, I’d get a mesh Wi-Fi system and call it a day. But she was happy with the speed and didn’t experience any dropouts or bandwidth issues. Turns out Wi-Fi extenders can be the right choice—but only in specific situations.

A Wi-Fi extender was the right choice for that specific use case

A solid option when you don’t need a fast, low latency connection

Devolo Magic 2 in outlet Credit: devolo

A Wi-Fi extender turned out to be the right choice for this use case due to a perfect storm of circumstances. For starters, they live in a small village that isn’t drowning in Wi-Fi signals. There’s an empty lot next to my mom’s house, and they only have one neighbor with Wi-Fi next to my uncle’s house. However, that neighbor’s Wi-Fi doesn’t reach my mom’s house or the garage where the extender is located, so interference isn’t an issue.

Next, the router’s Wi-Fi signal only reaches the garage, so my mom’s tablet doesn’t pick up the router’s network—only the signal coming from the extender. Her tablet is the only client device the extender has to handle, which helps explain why the connection is so stable and doesn’t slow down. She also only uses WhatsApp and YouTube, so about 15Mbps is plenty for her needs, especially since there aren’t any other devices competing for bandwidth.

She also doesn’t need a low-latency connection, so the fact that the extender delivers less than half of the available bandwidth and adds some latency doesn’t mean squat in her case. Lastly, the extender covers her entire house, so I didn’t need to daisy-chain multiple extenders, which would likely have severely reduced both the speed and quality of the Wi-Fi connection.

So yeah, I realized that Wi-Fi extenders aren’t complete trash—but only in specific circumstances. When the area you want to cover isn’t drowning in Wi-Fi signals, when you don’t need fast internet, when client devices can’t see the primary router’s network, and when the extender only has to handle a single device or a handful of them, it can be a solid option for covering Wi-Fi dead spots.

You shouldn’t completely ignore Wi-Fi extenders

Just be aware of their limitations

A Wi-Fi Extender on the wall and three Mesh routers above the desk. Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek | Best Buy | CoinUp / Shutterstock

In the end, picking a Wi-Fi extender was the right choice after all, probably because of the right combination of factors:

  • Minimal interference from the main router or nearby Wi-Fi networks
  • Client devices connected to the extender not having access to a usable signal from the main router
  • The extender only having to handle one or a few client devices
  • No need for a fast or low-latency connection

If you’ve got a similar combination of factors, you might be able to make it work even with a Wi-Fi repeater. For instance, if you live in a rural area or suburb with little Wi-Fi interference, only plan to connect one or a handful of devices to the extender at a time, and don’t care about fast, low-latency internet, it’s worth giving an extender a try. But if you need high-speed, stable Wi-Fi and your house or apartment is drowning in Wi-Fi and other wireless signals, consider a different solution.

An old router repurposed as a wireless access point can be a great option, as can a proper access point with wired backhaul. A mesh Wi-Fi system is also a better solution, even when using wireless backhaul. If you’ve got coaxial cabling, you should look into MoCA adapters. Even powerline adapters can be a better solution than a Wi-Fi extender in many situations.

A year later, it’s still going strong

Since I installed it, I’ve received zero complaints from my mom. I’ve also visited a few times and slept over in my old room, the one farthest from the extender (we’re talking about roughly 16 feet and multiple concrete walls between the extender and my room), and the connection has been stable, if not particularly strong. I managed to browse Reddit and listen to Spotify simultaneously, watch YouTube in 720p and 1080p, and even download a few small indie games on my PC handhelds without the signal dropping or the speed slowing to a halt.

In most situations, Wi-Fi extenders are the last option you should reach for to bring Wi-Fi to dead spots in your household. But when the stars align, like they did in my case, a Wi-Fi repeater can be a cheap and cheerful solution to your Wi-Fi woes.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


If you are a book purist, you might scoff when I recommend an e-reader instead of buying physical books, and I won’t blame you. The allure of the smell of pages, the weight of the book in my hands, the whole ritual, is hard to resist. 

However, if you allow me some leeway to convince you, there’s a strong argument to be made against physical books and in favor of using e-readers. So let me make the case for e-readers, because once you understand what you’ve been missing, it’s hard to go back.

Your entire library fits in your bag

This is the most obvious advantage, but it doesn’t get enough credit. I always read more than one book at a time, and carrying two or three physical books around is not realistic. Thick books alone are a chore to carry.

With an e-reader, you carry hundreds of books in a slim package. Switching between titles takes a second. If you travel frequently, this alone is reason enough to make the switch.

A thousand-page hardcover is great for your bookshelf but terrible for your commute.

Fat books are a workout, not a reading experience

If, like me, you are into fantasy books, you know they can be a behemoth to handle. You have to constantly shift how you’re holding it, find a way to keep it open, and somehow also stay comfortable. Thin books are fine, but the moment a book crosses a certain thickness, it starts working against you.

An e-reader weighs the same regardless of whether you’re reading a short novel or a massive fantasy series. That’s it. Whether I am reading The Count of Monte Cristo or the next book in Brandon Sanderson’s The Stormlight Archive series, my Supernote Nomad remains the same. 

Reading at night without waking anyone up

I do a lot of my reading at night, and this is where physical books completely fall apart for me. Lamps and book lights never feel comfortable. The light is never quite right, and if you share a room with someone, the whole setup becomes a problem.

Most e-readers, including Kindles, have a built-in backlight that you can dim to whatever level feels right. You can even switch to warm light mode, making it easier on your eyes. 

I’ve read at 3 AM with the brightness all the way down, and it felt completely natural. No lamp and no squinting required. 

Look up any word without losing your place

English is not my first language, and even for native speakers, encountering an unfamiliar word in the middle of a chapter is common. With a physical book, your options are to grab your phone and look it up, which almost always leads to distraction, or skip it and lose a bit of meaning.

On a Kindle or most other e-readers, you tap the word and the definition appears instantly. You can translate it, add it to a vocabulary list, and get back to reading in seconds. I look up far more words now than I ever did with physical books, and my reading comprehension is genuinely better for it.

Taking notes you’ll actually use later

I used to annotate physical books with a pen, and those notes would just sit there on the page, never to be seen again. Transferring them somewhere useful took more effort than I was ever willing to put in.

With my Supernote Nomad, I can use its Digest feature to clip what I am reading and quickly add any additional handwritten notes. I can then export those notes to Obsidian and process them. 

If you use any e-reader, highlighting a passage and adding a note will take a couple of seconds. Most e-readers also aggregate all your highlights and notes in one place, allowing you to quickly riffle through your notes without flipping pages. 

With physical books, my notes died on the page. With an e-reader, they became something I actually use.

Since these are digital notes, you can process them into your note-taking app to further digest the material.

Books are cheaper and easier to buy

Buying physical books is always more expensive than getting the digital version. Also, since most publishers are phasing out mass-market paperbacks, we are left with trade paperback and hardcover options, which may look better but also cost significantly more.

E-books don’t have that problem. I have purchased several books at less than half the price I would have paid for a physical version. Also, most of the time, e-books are on sale, making them even more affordable. 

And when you find a book you want to read at midnight, you don’t have to wait for a delivery or drive to a store. You buy it and start reading immediately. The convenience is hard to overstate once you get used to it.

Should you switch?

If you love the experience of physical books, the covers, the smell, the shelf aesthetic, that’s a completely valid reason to stick with them. There’s nothing wrong with it. I myself am curating my own bookshelf, and there will always be a place for those special books. 

But for convenience and ease of discovery and reading, I recommend you at least invest in one e-reader. It’s also one of the best times to buy them, as you can get good options around $100

Since these are e-readers, you don’t even need to upgrade them as often as your phone. If you don’t accidentally break them, they can easily last 5-6 years, making them worth the investment.



Source link